VeraFlo With Prontosan® and Wound and Fracture Healing.

May 27, 2019 updated by: Brett Crist

Does VeraFlo With Prontosan® Decrease Time to Wound and Fracture Healing in Patients With Infected Lower Extremity Fractures With Indwelling Hardware?

To answer the question: "Do Prontosan instillations decrease time to wound and fracture healing and decrease bacterial load compared to wound vac treatment without Prontosan?," we will enroll up to 30 subjects (for an anticipated 20 complete data sets) into this trial. The subjects will be split equally into two different groups by randomization. One groups will have wound vac therapy with Prontosan, and one group will have wound vac therapy without Prontosan. Data related to wound and fracture healing and bacterial load will be assessed between the two groups to determine if wound vac therapy with Prontosan speeds up healing time and decreases bacterial load.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Detailed Description

Surgical site infections (SSIs) are a devastating and relatively common surgical complication, occurring in 2% to 5% of patients undergoing surgery in the United States. SSIs can significantly increase patient morbidity, hospital stay duration, healthcare costs, and patient mortality (Anderson 2011).

Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) with Vacuum-Assisted Closure (VAC) is an established adjunctive treatment option for open wounds that offers the ability to promote healing. However, there is limited evidence for its utility with active infections. Wounds that are acutely infected or that contain an adherent biofilm present a challenging problem (Kim et al 2015).

Wound VAC therapy involves cleaning the wound, applying a custom-fit foam to cover the wound, placing a transparent drape over the wound and adjacent skin, and attaching tubing to connect the foam to a VAC suction canister. NPWT is achieved with a pulling force supplied by the VAC suction canister. Typically, suction will remain at a constant pressure until the dressing is removed. Continuous VAC therapy was recently reported to be more effective than standard moist wound care in surgical site infection after ankle surgery (Zhou et al. 2015).

VAC therapy with instillations is a novel treatment option that provides the combination of negative pressure with intermittent instillation of a solution. Polihexanide (Prontosan®) is a modern antiseptic that combines a broad antimicrobial spectrum with low toxicity, high tissue compatibility, no reported adsorption and good applicability as solution, gel, ointment, foam and in wound dressing. Unlike other antiseptics, the antimicrobial efficacy of Prontosan® is not impaired in human wound fluid, human tissue or by high loads of blood or albumin. Furthermore, Prontosan® blocks the microbial attachment to surfaces and has been shown to effectively remove biofilms in vitro and in vivo (Hubner et al 2010).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

7

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Missouri
      • Columbia, Missouri, United States, 65212
        • University of Missouri

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients 18 years and older
  • Patients who will be undergoing surgical management (including the use of NPWT therapy) of an infected lower extremity status-post open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant females
  • Incarcerated patients and those not able to give informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: VeraFlo with Prontosan
V.A.C. VeraFlo™ Therapy, the only NPWT system with an instillation feature which allows solution to dwell in the wound for thorough contact with the wound bed. The solution being instilled is Prontosan: Unlike other antiseptics, the antimicrobial efficacy of Prontosan® is not impaired in human wound fluid, human tissue or by high loads of blood or albumin. Furthermore, Prontosan® blocks the microbial attachment to surfaces and has been shown to effectively remove biofilms in vitro and in vivo (Hubner et al 2010).
VeraFlo device with Prontosan instillation (n=10).
Active Comparator: V.A.C Ulta System
The V.A.C.Ulta™ Therapy System is an integrated wound therapy system that provides NPWT (negative pressure wound therapy), without instillation.
V.A.C. Ulta Negative Pressure Wound Therapy System without instillation (n=10).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Bacterial Load
Time Frame: approximately 4 weeks
Semiquantitative wound culture(s) done at each debridement procedure, (up to 3). Organism quantities are listed as scant, moderate, or heavy. Report includes identification of organism, and susceptibility. Wound cultures will be analyzed and reported by the University of Missouri Hospital Laboratory.
approximately 4 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Number of Operative Debridements Until Wound Healed
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Brett D Crist, MD, University of Missouri, Missouri Orthopaedic Institute

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 1, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 1, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

December 3, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 20, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 27, 2019

Last Verified

May 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2003641

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Infection

Clinical Trials on VeraFlo with Prontosan

Subscribe