Continuous Tibial Nerve Block Versus Single Shot Tibial Nerve Block

May 25, 2016 updated by: Antoun Nader, Northwestern University

A Randomized Comparison of a Continuous Posterior Tibial Nerve Block and Single Injection Posterior Tibial Nerve Block in Patients Undergoing Forefoot Surgery

Foot surgery often causes severe and prolonged pain postoperatively. Prior methods of postoperative pain control included oral narcotics, single injection regional techniques and more recently continuous nerve catheters. Recent studies have demonstrated a benefit with continuous popliteal catheters when compared to single injection techniques in regards to postoperative pain control and patient satisfaction for foot surgeries.

Nerve blocks in the popliteal fossa involve both the common peroneal nerve and the tibial nerve. The innervation to the plantar surface of the forefoot involves the tibial nerve and does not involve the peroneal nerve. The purpose of this study is to compare the continuous posterior tibial nerve catheter with a single injection posterior tibial nerve block when used as part of a surgical ankle block for forefoot surgery.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
        • Northwestern Memorial Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients (18 to 65 years old) undergoing elective scheduled forefoot surgery (hallux valgus repair and metatarsal osteotomy).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient refusal to be included
  • Presence of language barrier that prohibits proper communication with patient
  • Under age of 18,
  • Pregnancy
  • History of allergy to local anesthetics or opioids
  • Presence of a progressive neurological deficit
  • Chronic opioid or drug abuse
  • Diabetes
  • Active infection in leg
  • Unstable cardiovascular, renal or hepatic disease,
  • Unwillingness to comply with follow up.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Posterior tibial nerve catheter
5 ml bolus of 0.5% ropivacaine. The catheter will then be connected to a portable pump delivering 3 ml/h of 0.2% ropivacaine with a 2ml bolus every two hours.
5ml bolus of 0.5% ropivacaine with 3 ml/h of 0.2% ropivacaine with a bolus every two hours
Other Names:
  • Naropin
Active Comparator: Single injection PTNB
Single injection posterior tibial nerve block (PTNB) of 0.5% ropivacaine
5 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine
Other Names:
  • Naropin

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of recovery
Time Frame: Up to five days
Quality of recovery
Up to five days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain control (pain score)
Time Frame: Up to 1 week
pain control (pain score) between groups
Up to 1 week
Opioid consumption
Time Frame: Up to 1 week
Opioid consumption
Up to 1 week
patient satisfaction
Time Frame: Up to 1 week
patient satisfaction with pain control
Up to 1 week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Antoun Nader, MD, Northwestern Memorial Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 20, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 13, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

March 15, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 27, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 25, 2016

Last Verified

May 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hallux Valgus

Clinical Trials on Posterior tibial nerve catheter

Subscribe