Treatment of Unstable Distal Clavicular Fractures (Neer 2b): Hook Plate vs Locking Plate

March 14, 2012 updated by: Leisheng Jiang, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
The investigators propose to test the hypotheses that compared with Hook Plate (HP), Locking Plate (LP) reduces the postoperative complications and leads to a better functional recovery after unstable distal clavicle fractures (Neer 2b).

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Detailed Description

Controversy exists regarding the optimal treatment for patients with unstable distal clavicular fractures (Neer 2b). The recognized treatment alternatives are Hook plate.Notably, criticisms on this fixation method also appeared and the potential risks of hook migration, loosening, subacromial impingement or rotator cuff injury, and acromial osteolysis were still unsolved. Recently, Herrmann et al.and Largo et al.stabilized the distal clavicle with Locking plate (LP) and these studies offered encouraging support for LP. Because of small sample size (27 patients) and nonrandomization, the convictive power of these researches is not strong enough.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Shanghai, China, 200092
        • Orthopaedic department,Xinhua hospital affiliated to Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 76 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age 18-80 years
  2. Unstable fractures of distal clavicle (Neer 2b fractures), acute or chronic and unilateral fractures.
  3. Normal shoulder functions before injury.
  4. Internal fixation with either HP or LP.
  5. The subjects were in good health and were able to comply with all prescribed follow-up procedures.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients who present multiple traumas.
  2. Patients with other serious injuries to either upper limb that would interfere with rehabilitation.
  3. Patients with a pathological, recurrent or open clavicle fracture.
  4. Patient unwilling to give written informed consent.
  5. Patients with cognitive impairment unable to comply with treatment programme.
  6. Patients with a serious disorder of bone metabolism other than osteoporosis (e.g., endocrine bone diseases, osteomalacia and Paget's disease)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Hook Plate
20 participants will be enrolled in this group.
All participants will have an open reduction internal fixation. The affected upper limb will be temporarily fixed by a sling after admission. Under necessary test, general anaesthetic and antibiotic prophylaxis, the patients will be placed in a beach-chair position in an orthopaedic theatre. The operated side will be prepped and draped and a transverse incision will be made over the fracture site. The fracture ends will be identified, reduced and fixed with HP. X-ray was applied to check the grade of reduction before the operation is completed. Post-operative care will include early active mobilization managed by a standard physiotherapy rehabilitation regime.
Experimental: Locking Plates
20 paticipants will be enrolled in this group
All participants will have an open reduction internal fixation. The affected upper limb will be temporarily fixed by a sling after admission. Under necessary test, general anaesthetic and antibiotic prophylaxis, the patients will be placed in a beach-chair position in an orthopaedic theatre. The operated side will be prepped and draped and a transverse incision will be made over the fracture site. The fracture ends will be identified, reduced and fixed with locking plate. X-ray was applied to check the grade of reduction before the operation is completed. Post-operative care will include early active mobilization managed by a standard physiotherapy rehabilitation regime.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
the postoperative complications
Time Frame: 12 months
complication that related with surgery or fracture will be defined as any event that necessitated another operative procedure or additional medical treatment
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
the affected limb function
Time Frame: 3, 6, 9,12 months
the affected limb function measured using the Constant-Murley Score and using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Score measured at 3, 6,9and 12months post-operatively.
3, 6, 9,12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Sheng L Jiang, doctor, Orthopaedic department, Shanghai Jiaotong University Xinhua Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2013

Study Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 11, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 14, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

March 15, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 15, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 14, 2012

Last Verified

March 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • U2032001

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Clavicle Injuries

Clinical Trials on Hook Plate

Subscribe