Prediction of Response to Intra-articular Injections of Hyaluronic Acid for Knee Osteoarthritis

The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether the investigators can develop a computer algorithm to predict which individual patients will respond to injections of hyaluronic acid (HA) products for knee osteoarthritis.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Background Osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee is a debilitating condition that affects an estimated 21 million Americans. This number is expected to rise steadily as the population ages. The medical expenditures associated with arthritis and other rheumatic conditions in the United States have increased from $50 billion in 1997 to $86 billion in 2003. In 2003, almost 420,000 total knee replacements were performed, primarily for arthritis. Injections of hyaluronic acid (HA) have been shown to provide symptom relief for many OA patients who have failed to respond to conservative interventions. Many other patients, however, experience only slight or no improvement. The results from this study will allow physicians to identify whether a patient is likely or not likely to respond well to HA therapy leading to improved treatment success rates.

Goals This study has two related goals: 1) to identify patient and treatment factors that predict response to intra-articular injections of hyaluronic acid for knee osteoarthritis using multivariable analysis and 2) develop mathematical and statistical models that will predict individual patient response to HA for knee OA.

It is anticipated that the investigators will develop computer software in this study that can support clinical decision making related to viscosupplementation in the treatment of knee OA. If this project yields successful patient predictive models, physicians who are considering a trial of HA for a patient will have some empirical basis for treatment selection. Eventually a physician would be able to assess a relatively small number of variables for a patient and then be provided with predictions regarding treatment response.

**Please note that the study site at the Naval Medical Center in Portsmouth, Virginia can only enroll patients who are eligible to be treated at a military facility.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

198

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Virginia
      • Portsmouth, Virginia, United States, 23708-2197
        • Naval Medical Center Portsmouth (this site can only enroll patients who are eligible to be treated at a military facility)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Symptomatic knee osteoarthritis presenting to physician's office
  • Radiographic evidence of knee osteoarthritis
  • Age 18 years or older
  • Failed minimum of 3 months of non-operative treatment, including, but not limited to, Tylenol, anti-inflammatory medication, cortisone injection, physical therapy, bracing, and/or heel wedge
  • Symptoms for at least 3 months

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Associated ligamentous instability
  • History of deep knee infection
  • Candidate for total knee arthroplasty or arthroscopy
  • Peripheral neuropathy.
  • X-rays that are completely negative and only MRI evidence or arthroscopic evidence (from previous arthroscopy) of OA.
  • Prior HA injections at any point in the past
  • Chondrocalcinosis
  • Patients with precautions or contraindications for viscosupplementation use
  • Cortisone injection within past 3 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Synvisc (hylan G-F 20)
Three 2 cc injections at weekly intervals
Other Names:
  • Synvisc
Active Comparator: Euflexxa (1% sodium hyaluronate)
Three 2 cc injections at weekly intervals
Other Names:
  • Euflexxa

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain Scale
Time Frame: Baseline and at 6 month follow-up
The KOOS is 42-item patient-report questionnaire that assesses symptoms and problems associated with knee injury and osteoarthritis. It yields scores for five scales including Pain, Other Symptoms, Function in Daily Living, Function in Sport/Recreation, and Knee-Related Quality of Life. We used only the Pain scale which has a range of 0 to 100 where 100 represents the "best" score, i.e., no pain. We reported differences in baseline Pain scale score from Pain scale score at 6 months so these scores could theoretically range from -100 (moving from no pain to maximum pain) to 100 (moving from maximum pain to no pain). Positive change scores represent improvement from baseline.
Baseline and at 6 month follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 6 Months
Time Frame: Assessments were at baseline to 6 month follow-up
The VAS is a patient-reported assessment of knee pain. Patients mark on a line (0-100mm) their current level of knee pain while moving where 0 represent no pain and 100 represents maximum pain. We report changes in VAS pain rating between baseline and 6 month follow-up. Therefore scores can theoretically range from -100 (moving from maximum pain to no pain) to 100 (moving from no pain to maximum pain). Negative change scores represent decreases in perceived pain or improvement.
Assessments were at baseline to 6 month follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Robert Marx, MD, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York
  • Principal Investigator: Marlene DeMaio, MD, United States Naval Medical Center, Portsmouth

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 12, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 16, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

March 20, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 2, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 19, 2014

Last Verified

February 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteoarthritis, Knee

Clinical Trials on hylan G-F 20

Subscribe