- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01575314
Cost-consequence Analysis of Parenchymal Stapling Device Versus Hand-sewing for Pulmonary Lobectomy in Lung Disease
February 1, 2016 updated by: Apichat Tantraworasin, Chiang Mai University
Cost-consequence Analysis of Parenchymal Stapling Device Versus Hand-sewing for Pulmonary Lobectomy in Lung Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and cost difference of using a parenchymal stapling device versus hand sewing for a pulmonary lobectomy in patients with lung disease (mass or others).
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
There are many lung diseases that need surgical treatment including malignancy lesion or benign lesions such as lung bleb or bullae, lung cyst, benign tumor, infection (necrotizing pneumonia, lung abscess, aspergilloma) etc.
One of the most common procedure is pulmonary lobectomy.
The surgical method for dividing parenchyma when performing lobectomy was divided in two methods.
In the past, the investigators used hand-sewn technique but this procedure was time-consuming, high risk of air leakage, infection and re-operation, long length of hospital stay and high total cost of treatment.
In the present time, the investigators use stapling device which has been used worldwide in various field of surgery since 1995.
Many studies proved that using stapling devices can reduce post-operative complication, length of hospital stay and total cost of treatment and also became the standard instrument for lung surgery.
In Thailand, these devices have been used for at least 5 years but they were not included in all of Health Insurance of Thai Government.
Many patients had to pay for these devices by themselves, approximately 323-484.5 USD.
Therefore, the investigators try to prove the hypothesis that using stapling devices for lung surgery would reduce the cost of treatment, post-operative air leakage, re-operative rate, length of hospital stay and time of surgery.
The result of this study may effect the decision for including these devices in the Health Insurance of Thai Government.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
53
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Chaing Mai
-
Amphoe Meung, Chaing Mai, Thailand, 50200
- Department of surgery, Faculty of medicine, Chiang Mai University Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
15 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT, CHILD)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients who diagnosed lung diseases that need to perform pulmonary lobectomy
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients have complete fissure. therefore, no procedure need to divide the lung parenchyma.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: DOUBLE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: stapling device
stapling device refer to patients who were randomized to use stapler for dividing lung parenchyma.
|
Stapling device include GIA 80, TA 45, endo GIA 60, endo GIA 45
Other Names:
|
|
NO_INTERVENTION: hand sewn
hand sewn refer to patients who were randomized to use hand suturing for dividing lung parenchyma.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Post-operative air leak, operative time, and duration of air leak
Time Frame: In the operative day, after surgery, until patient can be discharged.
|
To compare post-operative air leakage between two groups.
This data will be analyzed by fisher exact probability test.
We will start observation of the air leakage at postoperative day 1.
The stoping role is when statistically significant difference occur.
We will measure and report in the number of patients who have post-operative air leakage.
|
In the operative day, after surgery, until patient can be discharged.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
cost of treatment
Time Frame: within the time that patient admit in the hospital
|
The cost measurements for each treatment arm focused on the following: 1) direct medical cost (costs of goods and services that are directly provided by the health care system including surgical equipment, drugs and nursing care), 2) direct non-medical cost (costs of goods and services used for health care not directly provided by the heath care system such as transportation, additional meals for patient or their relatives and residence for their relatives),and 3) indirect cost (costs of health care consumption gained as a result of a health care intervention and value of production loss due to illness or treatment such as income lost from sick-leave).
|
within the time that patient admit in the hospital
|
|
Re-operation due to postoperative air leakage
Time Frame: 8 month after recording data
|
To compare the re-operation due to air leakage between two groups.
This data will be analyzed by fisher exact probability test.
We will record the re-operation due to air leakage.
The stopping role is when statistically significant difference occur.
In general, we accepted re-operation for air leakage especially patients who have chronic lung disease (COPD), the rate of re-operation that we can accept approximately 20-30 percent We will measure and report in the number of patients who have to perform re-operation due to post-operative air leakage.
|
8 month after recording data
|
|
Length of Hospital stay
Time Frame: 8 month after recording data
|
To compare the length of hospital stay between two groups. Counting of Length of hospital stay (days) will start at 1st post-operative day until discharge. This data will be analyzed by t-test. We will measure and report in the unit of time (days). |
8 month after recording data
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Apichat Tantraworasin, M.D., Department of Surgery, Faculty of medicine, Chiang mai University
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Moggi L, Giustozzi GM, Cagini L, Boselli C. [Surgical staplers in thoracic surgery]. G Chir. 1992 Apr;13(4):177-9. Italian.
- Tantraworasin A, Seateang S, Bunchungmongkol N. Staplers versus hand-sewing for pulmonary lobectomy: randomized controlled trial. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2014 Mar;22(3):309-14. doi: 10.1177/0218492313491754. Epub 2013 Aug 19.
Helpful Links
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
November 1, 2011
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
September 1, 2012
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
July 1, 2013
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
April 6, 2012
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 10, 2012
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
April 11, 2012
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)
February 2, 2016
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 1, 2016
Last Verified
February 1, 2016
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- SUR-11-09-26A-13-X
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Malignant Neoplasm of Bronchus or Lung, Unspecified
-
Hospital Sao RafaelCompletedHodgkin Disease | Malignant Neoplasm of Breast | Malignant Neoplasm of Colon | Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, Follicular (Nodular) | Malignant Neoplasm of Bronchus and Lung | Secondary Neoplasm Malignant and Unspecified Lymph Nodes | Malignant Melanoma of the Skin | Malignant Neoplasm of Small IntestineBrazil
-
Haukeland University HospitalUniversity of BergenCompletedSecondary Malignant Neoplasm of Lymph Node | Disorder of Upper Gastrointestinal Tract | Pancreatic Nodule | Secondary and Unspecified Malignant Neoplasm of Retroperitoneal Lymph NodesNorway
-
McMaster UniversityActive, not recruitingSurgical Procedure, Unspecified | Genital Neoplasm Malignant FemaleCanada
-
Seoul Veterans HospitalUnknownSquamous Cell Carcinoma of BronchusKorea, Republic of
-
Wake Forest University Health SciencesNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedUnspecified Adult Solid Tumor, Protocol Specific | Malignant NeoplasmUnited States
-
Tata Medical CenterCompletedMalignant Neoplasm of Oropharynx Stage III | Malignant Neoplasm of Larynx Stage III | Malignant Neoplasm of Hypopharynx Stage III | Malignant Neoplasm of Oropharynx Stage IVa | Malignant Neoplasm of Oropharynx Stage IVb | Malignant Neoplasm of Larynx Stage IV | Malignant Neoplasm of Hypopharynx... and other conditionsIndia
-
University of Illinois at ChicagoMillennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.CompletedMelanoma | Head and Neck Neoplasms | Malignant Neoplasm of Breast | Malignant Neoplasm of Thorax | CNS Malignancy | Malignant Neoplasm of Gastrointestinal Tract | Genitourinary Neoplasms Malignancy and Gender UnspecifiedUnited States
-
Yonsei UniversityNot yet recruitingMalignant Neoplasm of Stomach, UnspecifiedSouth Korea
-
Charite University, Berlin, GermanyGerman Cancer AidCompletedMalignant Neoplasm of Stomach | Secondary Malignant Neoplasm of Peritoneum | Secondary Malignant Neoplasm of Other and Unspecified SitesGermany
-
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical CenterCompletedPrimary Malignant Neoplasm of Lung | Primary Malignant Neoplasm of Gastrointestinal TractUnited States
Clinical Trials on stapling device
-
Medical University of ViennaRecruitingTransanal Stapled AnastomosisAustria
-
Ruijin HospitalTerminated
-
University of ThessalyRecruitingPhimosis | Foreskin; Tightness | Redundant PrepuceGreece
-
The University of Texas Medical Branch, GalvestonCooper CompaniesTerminatedWound Heal | Operative TimeUnited States
-
Vanderbilt UniversityTerminatedBladder Cancer | HemostasisUnited States
-
St. Joseph's Healthcare HamiltonCompletedLung Cancer | Thoracic Cancer | Lung NeoplasmCanada
-
Varazdin General HospitalCompleted
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisCompletedLung Neoplasms | Chest Tubes | Pulmonary Surgical Procedures | Tissue Adhesives | Surgical StaplersFrance
-
Medtronic - MITGCompletedHemorrhoidsUnited States
-
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical CenterTyco Healthcare GroupCompletedColonic Diseases | Rectal DiseasesUnited States