Elders Preferences in Care Decisions (EPIC-D)

December 16, 2021 updated by: University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Improving Appropriate Colorectal Cancer Screening in Elderly Patients

The purpose of this research study is to explore ways to improve appropriate colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in the elderly by attempting to target screening in those most likely to benefit and avoiding screening in those least likely to benefit.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The investigators propose a randomized controlled trial at the patient level to determine the efficacy of a colorectal cancer screening decision support intervention for patients ages 70 to 84 within a clinical setting. The investigators hypothesize that the use of the intervention will prepare patients for individualized decision making with their providers and result in an improvement in appropriate CRC screening decisions and screening outcomes. To assess appropriate CRC screening decisions and screening, the investigators will use a classification scheme derived from the literature based on age and the Charlson Comorbidity Index. Using this scheme, appropriate screening will include screening for those in the best health because they are likely to benefit, no screening for those in the worst health because they are unlikely to benefit, and evidence of a discussion about CRC screening for those in the intermediate health group because the benefit is unclear.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

424

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
        • Duke Practiced Based Research Network

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

70 years to 84 years (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Men and women ages 70 to 84
  • Not up to date with colon cancer screening or surveillance

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Men and women younger than 70 years of age or older than 84
  • History of Colorectal Cancer
  • Inflammatory bowel disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Making A Decision About CRC Screening
A decision support intervention that is a literacy sensitive paper based tool with educational information targeted to the patient's age and gender.

Targeted by age and gender with 3 components.

  1. Educational component
  2. Values clarification exercise
  3. Individualized decision making worksheet

The intervention or control condition is administered before the index visit with the patient's provider.

Other Names:
  • Making A Decision About Colon Cancer Screening Woman 70
  • Making A Decision About Colon Cancer Screening Woman 75
  • Making A Decision About Colon Cancer Screening Woman 80
  • Making A Decision About Colon Cancer Screening Men 70
  • Making A Decision About Colon Cancer Screening Men 75
  • Making A Decision About Colon Cancer Screening Men 80
Placebo Comparator: Drivers 65 Plus
The placebo comparator is an attention control with information about driving tips for drivers age 65 and older.
This text booklet is provided as an attention control for those in the control arm and like the intervention is administered prior to the index visit with the patient's provider.
Other Names:
  • Control condition
  • Attention control

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Appropriate colorectal cancer screening
Time Frame: Six months after intervention or control was adminstered
The proportion of participants classified as having appropriate colorectal cancer screening in the intervention group compared to the control group. Appropriate screening is a combined outcome measure using patient report of completion or non-completion of CRC screening tests and patient report of discussions about CRC screening with their provider at the index visit. The outcome will be measured six months after the index visit. The index visit is the patient/provider visit that occurred after the decision support intervention or control condition was administered.
Six months after intervention or control was adminstered

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Appropriate colorectal cancer screening decisions
Time Frame: At baseline (after intervention or control was administered)
The proportion of participants classified as having appropriate colorectal cancer screening decisions in the intervention group will be compared to the control group. Appropriate screening decision making is a combined outcome measure using patient report of intent to complete or not complete CRC screening tests and discussions about CRC screening with their provider. This outcome will be measured immediately after the patient and provider index visit. The index visit is the patient/provider visit that occurred after the decision support intervention or control condition was administered.
At baseline (after intervention or control was administered)
Appropriate screening and mediators
Time Frame: Six months after intervention or control was adminstered
For the mediation analysis covariates will be evaluated as potential mediators. The potential mediators to be examined include adequate preparation for individualized decision making (adequate knowledge+ clear values); knowledge scores, screening preference before the index visit, decisional balance, reported discussion during the index visit, gender, previous screening, functional status, and literacy level.
Six months after intervention or control was adminstered
Appropriate screening for health strata
Time Frame: Six months after intervention or control was adminstered
Once we have tested our hypothesis for the main effects, we will also perform hypothesis-generating exploratory analyses to examine effect of the intervention in sub-groups of patients. We will examine the effect in the three strata (best, intermediate, worst health groups) defined by age and Charlson comorbidity score.
Six months after intervention or control was adminstered
Appropriate screening for stool cards
Time Frame: Six months after intervention or control was adminstered
For this analysis, appropriate screening test completion will include stool cards for all age groups and health groups. Analyses described for the primary outcome will be performed using this classification of appropriate screening test completion.
Six months after intervention or control was adminstered

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Carmen L Lewis, MD, MPH, University of North Carolina
  • Study Director: Rowena J Dolor, MD, MHS, Duke University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 29, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 10, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

April 12, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 10, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 16, 2021

Last Verified

May 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Colon Cancer

Clinical Trials on Making A Decision About CRC Screening

Subscribe