Extension Study to Compare Long-term Efficacy and Safety of Ranibizumab Intravitreal Injections Versus Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant in Patients With RVO

April 11, 2016 updated by: Novartis Pharmaceuticals

An Open-label, Multi-center, 6-month Extension Study Comparing the Long-term Efficacy and Safety of Lucentis (Ranibizumab) Intravitreal Injections Versus Ozurdex (Dexamethasone) Intravitreal Implant in Patients With Visual Impairment Due to Macular Edema Following Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion (BRVO) or Central Retinal Vein Occlusion (CRVO) Who Have Completed the Respective Core Study (CRFB002EDE17 or CRFB002EDE18)

The study is intended to characterize the clinical benefit regarding safety and efficacy of a long term treatment with Lucentis in comparison with Ozurdex over an additional 6 months and a 3-month follow-up period, following the initial 6-month treatment in the respective core studies CRFB002EDE17 (NCT01396057) and CRFB002EDE18 (NCT01396083).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

175

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Augsburg, Germany, 85155
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Bad Rothenfelde, Germany, 49214
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Berlin, Germany, 10713
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Berlin, Germany, 13353
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Bonn, Germany, 53127
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Bremen, Germany, 28209
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Chemnitz, Germany, 09113
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Darmstadt, Germany, 64297
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Dresden, Germany, 01307
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Duesseldorf, Germany, 40225
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Düsseldorf, Germany, 40212
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Frankfurt, Germany, 60318
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Freiburg i. Br, Germany, 79106
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Glauchau, Germany, 08371
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Göttingen, Germany, 37075
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Halle, Germany, 06114
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Hamburg, Germany, 20246
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Ingolstadt, Germany, 85049
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Karlsruhe, Germany, 76133
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Karlsruhe, Germany, 76199
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Koeln, Germany, 50935
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Leipzig, Germany, 04103
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Ludwigshafen, Germany, 67063
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Marburg, Germany, 35039
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Minden, Germany, 32427
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Muelheim, Germany, 45468
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Muenster, Germany, 48149
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Muenster, Germany, 48145
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • München, Germany, 81675
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • München, Germany, 80336
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Recklinghausen, Germany, 45657
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Regensburg, Germany, 93042
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Sulzbach, Germany, 66280
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Tübingen, Germany, 72076
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Ulm, Germany, 89075
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Wolfsburg, Germany, 38442
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Wuerzburg, Germany, 97080
        • Novartis Investigative Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients must have completed the core study assessments at month 6 of study CRFB002EDE17 or CRFB002EDE18, respectively

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who experienced an uncontrollable rise in IOP during the core study CRFB002EDE17 respectively CRFB002EDE18, i.e. IOP could not be decreased to a stable level of < 25mmHg.
  • Use of other investigational drugs
  • Current use or likely need of systemic medications known to be toxic to the lens, retina or optic nerve
  • History of hypersensitivity to Ranibizumab or Ozurdex or any component of the ranibizumab respectively Ozurdey formulation
  • Any type of advanced, severe or unstable disease or its treatment, that could interfere with evaluations or put the patient at special risk
  • Women
  • who were pregnant or breast feeding (pregnancy defined as the state of a female after conception and until the termination of gestation, confirmed by a positive hCG laboratory test (>5 mIU/mL)
  • who were menstruating and capable of becoming pregnant* and not practicing a medically approved method of contraception (Pearl Index <1**)*** during and up to at least 4 weeks after the end of treatment. A negative pregnancy test (serum) for all women and for girls entering menarche was required with sufficient lead time before randomization

    • definition of post-menopausal: 12 months of natural (spontaneous) amenorrhea or 6 months of spontaneous amenorrhea with serum FSH levels >40 mIU/mL or 6 weeks post surgical bilateral oophorectomy with or without hysterectomy

      • examples of particularly reliable methods with Pearl Index (PI) <1, according to guidelines of "Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe":

        • Combination pill with estrogen and gestagen (no mini-pill, PI=0.1-0.9)
        • Vaginal ring (NuvaRing®, PI=0.65 uncorr.; 0.4 corr.)
        • Contraceptive patch (EVRA®, PI= 0.72 uncorr.; 0.9 corr.)
        • Estrogen-free ovulation inhibitors (Cerazette®, PI=0.14)
        • Progestin-containing contraceptives (Implanon®, PI=0-0.08)
        • Injectable 3-month depot progestins (PI=0.3-1.4; 0.88 corr.)
        • Intra-uterine progestin device (Mirena®, PI=0.16)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Ranibizumab (Arm A)

The PRN injection scheme applied in the core study will also be followed during this extension study:

Patients should be monitored monthly (starting at V1E) for VA and treatment is to be resumed when monitoring indicates loss of VA due to disease activity. Monthly injections should then be administered until stable VA is reached again for 3 consecutive monthly assessments (implying a minimum of 2 injections during stable VA). The interval between 2 doses should not be shorter than 1 month

0.5 mg/0.05 mL solution to be injected intravitreally. Ranibizumab was formulated as a sterile solution aseptically filled in a sterile glass vial. Each vial contained ranibizumab in an aqueous solution (pH 5.5) with histidine, trehalose and polysorbate 20.
Sham Comparator: Dexamethasone (Arm B)
A PRN re-treatment scheme will be applied for the Ozurdex arm during this extension study, i.e. patients may receive an implant at V1E or later as needed: Patients should be monitored monthly and if there is a decline from stable VA stability due to macular edema patients will receive another intravitreal implant. (700 µg; long acting release (LAR)) given that in the opinion of the investigator the patient would benefit from the re-treatment. However, a minimum period of 5 months in between implantations is required.
Ozurdex (Dexamethasone): intravitreal implant as per commercial label (700 µg Dexamethasone; Dexamethasone was formulated as a rod shaped implant to be inserted into the eye by an applicator. The implant as well as the respective applicator were suitable for single use only. Dexamethasone had to be stored according to label instructions and it had to be kept in a secure locked facility

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability
Time Frame: 6 months
The number of participants who experienced Adverse events, serious AE and death
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Raw Mean Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Treatment Group
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letters was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (EDTRS)-like chart while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters. An ETDRS visual acuity score of 85 is approximately 20/20. The range of BCVA (EDTRS) is 0 to 100 letters. A positive change from baseline of BCVA indicates improvement
Baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Percentage of Patients Gaining / Losing ≥ 15 / 10 / 5 Letters at Month 12 Compared to Baseline
Time Frame: 12 month
BCVA score was based on the number of letters read correctly on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity chart assessed at a starting distance of 4 meters. An ETDRS visual acuity score of 85 is approximately 20/20. An increased score indicates improvement in acuity. This outcome assessed the percentage of participants who were gaining/losing ≥15, 10 or 5 more letters of visual acuity at month 12 as compared with baseline
12 month
Change in Central Subfield Thickness (CSRT) From Baseline to Month 12
Time Frame: Baseline , Month 12
High Resolution OCT was performed at every study visit by Spectral Domain OCT (if not available Time Domain OCT was acceptable) and the images were transferred to a digital video disc. These assessments were performed by trained and adequately qualified experts at the sites and prior to any study drug administration. CSFT is the average retinal thickness of the circular area with 1 mm diameter around the foveal center.
Baseline , Month 12
Change of Foveal Center Point Thickness (FCPT) From Baseline to Month 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 12
FCPT (foveal center point thickness) was assessed by central reading center to ensure error- corrected measurements of retinal thickness and volumes,
Baseline, Month 12
Change in Mean Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-25)
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 months
The VFQ-25 composite and subscale scores range from 0 to 100, a higher score indicating better functioning. The 12 subscales in the VFQ-25 are general health, general vision, ocular pain, near activities, distance activities, social function, mental health, role difficulties, dependency, driving, color vision, and peripheral vision. The scores on the subscales were added together for a total score, which ranged from 0 to 100. A higher score indicated improvement in quality of life due to vision function.
Baseline, 12 months
Change in SF-36 Summary Scores
Time Frame: Baseline, month 12
The SF-36 measures the impact of disease on overall quality of life and consists of eight subscales (physical function, pain, general and mental health, vitality, social function, physical and emotional health) which can be aggregated to derive a physical-component summary score and a mental-component summary score. Scores for each subscale range from 0 to 10, and the composite scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health. A positive change from Baseline score indicates improvement in quality of life.
Baseline, month 12
Change in Euro Quality of Life Questionnaire (EQ-5D) VAS Summary Scores
Time Frame: Baseline, month 12
The Euro Quality of Life Questionnaire (EQ-5D) standardized instrument was utilized to measure health outcomes related to mobility, self care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Participants self-rate their health on a visual, vertical analogue scale from 0 to 100 where the endpoints are labeled "Best imaginable health state" (100) and "worst imaginable health state" (0).
Baseline, month 12
Time to the First Retreatment of Both Treatment Arms
Time Frame: 6 months
Time to the first retreatment
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 16, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 17, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

April 18, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 17, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 11, 2016

Last Verified

April 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Retinal Vein Occlusion

Clinical Trials on RFB002

Subscribe