Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) as Treatment Method for Pain in Fibromyalgia

February 15, 2017 updated by: University Hospital of North Norway
The purpose of this study is to investigate Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation as treatment method for pain in fibromyalgia.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Fibromyalgia (FIM) is a chronic pain condition with high prevalence. Studies involving neuroimaging techniques have identified functional differences in cerebral pain processing in patients with FIM, as compared to healthy controls. This may support that FIM do have a functional CNS component.

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive and safe method for inducing changes in cortical excitability. Previous studies showed that anodal stimulation of M1 may change pain perception, possibly by modulating functional anomalies in the FIM brain. The present study has two main goals:

  1. To investigate if tDCS may provide FIM patients with symptom relief due to reduction of pain.
  2. To investigate tDCS induced functional changes in the brain by using fMRI.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

70

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Tromsoe, Norway, 9038
        • University Hospital of North Norway

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Fibromyalgia (ACR-90 criteria, M79.7 ICD10)
  • Mean VAS > 4 daily 2 weeks prior to study).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe mental disease
  • CNS disease
  • Mental retardation
  • Age < 18

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: active tDCS
Anodal tDCS, M1, cathode supraorbital left, 2 mA, 20 min, 5 consecutive days.
Other Names:
  • model 0021
  • serial-no 0337
Sham Comparator: sham tDCS
tDCS fades out after 20 sec. administered double blind by coded program.
Anodal tDCS, M1, cathode supraorbital left, 2 mA, 20 min, 5 consecutive days.
Other Names:
  • model 0021
  • serial-no 0337
similar montage and time as active. Stimulation fades out after 20 sec.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Perceived pain
Time Frame: Change in VAS from baseline up to 49 days.
Pain (intensity and unpleasentness) measured with Visual Analog Scale. Repported at 3 points daily (0900hrs, 1500hrs, 2100hrs) using Short Message System (SMS) 14 days pre-treatment (baseline), during treatment 5 days, and 30 days post-treatment. Measure effect of active\sham tDCS on pain. 2 levels of group (active tDCS\ sham tDCS, 7 repeated measures: pre-treatment day 1, 2 ,3, 4, 5 - post) SMS messages contain 4 questions, mesauring pain intensity / pain unpleasentness (primary outcome), and stress / activation (secondary outcome).
Change in VAS from baseline up to 49 days.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cerebral pain processing
Time Frame: Change from baseline to post treatment. 7 days.
Phillps tesla 1.5 fMRi, pathway pain stimulator (Medoc, Israel) fMRI under pain stimulation for 60 participants. 20 recieve active tDCS, 20 recieve sham-tDCS, 20 age and gender matched (matched to active tDCS group) healthy controls. Baseline scan, post treatment scan.
Change from baseline to post treatment. 7 days.
Rating scales (HADS, SCL90, SF36, FIQ)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to post treatment. 30 days post treatment. Up to 65 days.
Time from inclusion to treatment start determines 30\14 days. Rating scales on Samsung Galaxy tab 10.1. HADS mesure anxiety and depression, SCL 90 measure symtoms of mental illness, SF36 mesure health related life quality, FIQ mesure symptom severity in fibromyalgia.
Change from baseline to post treatment. 30 days post treatment. Up to 65 days.
Perceived pain, natural history
Time Frame: Baseline compared to post-treatment. Up to 65 days
Pain (intensity and unpleasentness) measured with Visual Analog Scale. 3 times daily (0900hrs, 1500hrs, 2100hrs). A randomly selected sample of participants have VAS measured with SMS for 30 days pre treatment. Intention is to gather natural history sample to compare with a similarly lengthed post-treatment period.
Baseline compared to post-treatment. Up to 65 days
Perceived stress and activation
Time Frame: Change in VAS from baseline to during treatment and after treatment. Up to 49 days.
Stress and activation measured with Visual Analog Scale. Repported at 3 points daily (0900hrs, 1500hrs, 2100hrs) using Short Message System (SMS) 14 days pre-treatment (baseline), during treatment 5 days, and 30 days post-treatment. Measure effect of active\sham tDCS on stress and activation. 2 levels of group (active tDCS\ sham tDCS, 7 repeated measures: pre-treatment day 1, 2 ,3, 4, 5 - post) Measured using the same instrumet as the primary outcome.
Change in VAS from baseline to during treatment and after treatment. Up to 49 days.
Perceived stress and activation, natural history
Time Frame: Baseline compared to post-treatment. Up to 65 days
Stress and activation measured with Visual Analog Scale. 3 times daily (0900hrs, 1500hrs, 2100hrs). A randomly selected sample of participants have VAS measured with SMS for 30 days pre treatment. Intention is to gather natural history sample to compare with a similarly lengthed post-treatment period.
Baseline compared to post-treatment. Up to 65 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Per Aslaksen, ph.d, University of Tromso

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 15, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 11, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

May 15, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 16, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 15, 2017

Last Verified

June 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2010/2256/REK n
  • UNorthNorway (UNorthNorway)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Fibromyalgia

Clinical Trials on tDCS NeuroConn DC-stimulator plus

Subscribe