Local Anaesthetics Toxicity and Intralipid® (TOXALIP)

December 20, 2016 updated by: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Prevention of Systemic Toxicity Induced by Levobupivacaine and Ropivacaine by Intralipid®

The systemic toxicity of local anaesthetics may be treated using lipid emulsions ("lipid rescue"). However, there is no evidence-based proof of the efficacy of the treatment. The aim of the intended protocol is to study the effect of the emulsion Intralipid® on the toxicity prodromes in volunteers receiving either levobupivacaine or ropivacaine. After a sensitization session with lidocaine, subjects will receive in a double blind, crossover manner an i.v. infusion of levobupivacaine or ropivacaine followed by a rapid infusion of Intralipid®. The primary outcome will be the time of appearance of early neurologic signs of toxicity. In addition, the EEG and ECG will be monitored and blood sampling will be performed in order to evaluate the changes in pharmacokinetics induced by the emulsion.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Regional anaesthesia may induce toxic neurologic and cardiac reactions related to inadvertent intravenous injection or rapid absorption of local anaesthetics. Despite the appearance of the less toxic agents ropivacaine and levobupivacaine, the problem remains. Recently, a new therapeutics called "lipid rescue" emerged. This rapid injection of a lipid emulsion is supposed to act as a lipid sink, thus delaying the release of the toxic molecules to the target organs. Animal studies as well as clinical reports seem to favour this treatment. However, there is no evidence-based proof of the efficacy of this "lipid rescue".

The aim of the study is 1) to verify the efficacy of a lipid emulsion (Intralipid® 20%) on the toxicity induced by the local anaesthetics ropivacaine and levobupivacaine and 2) to compare the effect of the emulsion on the two agents.

Sixteen volunteers with strictly normal ECG and EEG will participate to the study.

After a sensitization session with lidocaine, the subjects will receive levobupivacaine or ropivacaine i.v. at a rate of 8 mg/min (max 120 mg) followed two minutes after the beginning of infusion by a bolus injection of Intralipid® 20% or of saline 120 mL in 1 minute. The infusion of local anaesthetics will be stopped immediately at the appearance of the early signs of toxicity. In addition to the recognition of the signs by the subject (trained by the sensitization session), an anaesthesiologist will ask if the subject has any symptom. A continuous monitoring of the EEG and of the ECG will be performed.

Sixteen subjects completing the study have been considered necessary to achieve a power of 90 % with an alpha risk of 5 %. A mean time to first signs of 3.8 ± 1.2 min has been considered in the placebo groups. A 45 % difference in the primary outcome has been considered. The study will be double blind crossover as a Latin square (four treatments, four sessions, four replications).

The investigators will consider the time between infusion initiation and appearance of the early signs of toxicity as primary outcome. The secondary outcomes will be the changes in ECG and EEG variables and the pharmacokinetic parameters observed. For that purpose, blood will be sampled until the 8th hour after the beginning of local anaesthetic infusion.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

16

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Paris, France, 75013
        • CIC plurithématique Paris-Est (CIC-9304)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 36 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Volunteers ASA1

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: levobupivacaine placebo
Levobupivacaine 8 mg/min ropivacaine 8 mg/min
Other Names:
  • ropivacaine
  • levobupivacaine
Experimental: levobupivacaine Intralipid®
Levobupivacaine 8 mg/min ropivacaine 8 mg/min Intralipid® 120 ml in one min
Experimental: ropivacaine Intralipid®
Levobupivacaine 8 mg/min ropivacaine 8 mg/min Intralipid® 120 ml in one min
Placebo Comparator: ropivacaine placebo
Levobupivacaine 8 mg/min ropivacaine 8 mg/min
Other Names:
  • ropivacaine
  • levobupivacaine

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Duration of drug infusion
Time Frame: less than 15 minutes
less than 15 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
EEG : electroencephalogram
Time Frame: < 15 minutes
Detection of sub-clinical seizure activity
< 15 minutes
ECG : electrocardiogram
Time Frame: < 15 minutes
Duration of PR, QRs intervals
< 15 minutes
pharmacokinetics of local anesthetics (Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC))
Time Frame: 8 h
blood concentration of local anesthetics during 8 hours post administration : Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC)"
8 h

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Dan Benhamou, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 23, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 16, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

May 18, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 21, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 20, 2016

Last Verified

November 1, 2012

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Toxicity

Clinical Trials on placebo

Subscribe