A Randomized Study of Approaches in Total Hip Arthroplasty

December 4, 2018 updated by: Michael J. Taunton, M.D., Mayo Clinic

A Randomized Clinical Trial of Direct Anterior Approach and Mini-Posterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty

The primary aim of the study is to compare the results of an established, successful procedure, which is total hip arthroplasty through a mini-posterior approach to a less studied - increasingly popular procedure, which is total hip replacement through the direct anterior approach utilizing the orthopedic table.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

116

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
        • Mayo Clinic in Rochester

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 100 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria

  1. Male or Female patients between 20 and 100 with unilateral osteoarthritis (DJD) who are surgical candidates for total hip arthroplasty
  2. Study participants must be able to give informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

  1. Significant proximal femoral deformity (post SCFE, Perthes, DDH), acetabular dysplasia (ANY CROWE), inflammatory arthritis, septic arthritis, osteomyelitis, prior infection of hip joint, significant leg length discrepancy (> 4cm), osteoporosis, arthrodesis of the affected hip.
  2. The presence of infections, highly communicable diseases, e.g. AIDS, active tuberculosis, venereal disease, hepatitis.
  3. Significant neurological or musculoskeletal disorders or disease that may adversely affect normal gait or weight bearing.
  4. Presence of previous prosthetic hip replacement device (any type).
  5. Active Metastatic disease
  6. Active major Psychiatric illness
  7. Active Drug or alcohol abuse
  8. BMI > 40.
  9. Patients that are known to be pregnant
  10. Actively failing contralateral hip replacement.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Direct Anterior Approach
An oblique incision is made over the anterior margin of the tensor muscle. The fascia of the tensor muscle is identified and incised. The muscle is swept digitally laterally and a retractor is placed over the superior aspect of the femoral neck. The hip capsule is then incised and retracted.
Active Comparator: Mini-Posterior Approach
The surgical approach involved a 7 to 9.5 cm incision along the posterior aspect of the femur starting at the tip of the greater trochanter and proceeding distally. The fascia of the gluteus maximus was split, and blunt dissection revealed the underlying abductor and external rotator musculature. The external rotators an the hip capsule were incised and preserved as one layer, with an attempt being made to preserve the insertion of the quadratus femoris on the femur. The hip was dislocated posteriorly and the femoral neck was cut in accordance with the preoperative plan.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Activity monitors will be worn
Time Frame: Baseline to 1 year
3 monitoring sensors will be worn by the subject.
Baseline to 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

February 27, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 5, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 6, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

June 7, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 5, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 4, 2018

Last Verified

December 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 12-001341

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Total Hip Replacement

Clinical Trials on Direct Anterior Approach

Subscribe