Symptom Management Program for Hemodialysis Patients

June 14, 2012 updated by: Francess Danquah, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Self-management intervention may decrease symptom burden and improve functioning over time.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Self-management intervention (strategies) may decrease symptom burden (sleep disturbance, tiredness; itching and numbness) and improve functioning (social, physical and emotional) over time(baseline, 3 weeks and 8 weeks).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77003
        • DaVita Summit Dialysis
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77011
        • DaVita Houston Dialysis

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. age ≥ 18 years old,
  2. on HD three times a week,
  3. received HD for ≥ six months,
  4. read and write English,
  5. have telephone service.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • history of dementia,
  • acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) and active cancer, and
  • inability to give informed consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Self Management Strategies

Participants in the intervention group will receive printed self management strategies each of the 5 symptoms, a symptom diary with the self-management strategies and a 15 minutes discussion. The intervention script will instruct participants on how to use the printed strategies by PI and RA #1.

Week 3.

Participants in the intervention group will receive printed self management strategies each of the 5 symptoms, a symptom diary with the self-management strategies and a 15 minutes discussion. The intervention script will instruct participants on how to use the printed strategies by PI and RA #1.

Week 3

Other Names:
  • Behavioral
Active Comparator: Dietary Information
Control arm
The control or usual care group will receive a symptom diary designed for the control group without any strategies and a 5 minutes discussion on how to complete the diary from RA# 1. The PI will make weekly follow up calls on the same schedule as the intervention group starting week 4 until week 7 for a total of 4 calls focusing on enhancing healthy eating skills & adherence to renal diet and fluid restriction without discussing any intervention with the group.
Other Names:
  • Behavioral

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Decrease symptom burden
Time Frame: 8 weeks

The study aims are:

1. To compare the differences between the self management intervention and control group on the following outcomes:

  1. Decreased symptoms: itching, tiredness, numbness, sleep disturbance (difficulty falling asleep & difficulty staying asleep);
  2. Adherence to treatment diary Improved social functioning, physical functioning and emotional status.
8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility of implementing self management intervention
Time Frame: 5 weeks
To evaluate the feasibility of implementing the self management intervention for a larger randomized controlled studyTreatment delivered (number of interventions sessions delivered and strategies used); Treatment receipts (understanding of strategies); and Treatment enactment (reported perception of usefulness of the strategies).
5 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Francess V Danquah, PhD, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 24, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 14, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

June 15, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 15, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 14, 2012

Last Verified

June 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HSC-SN-11-0465

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Haemodialysis-induced Symptom

Clinical Trials on Self-management

Subscribe