- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01628874
Jet Injection of 1% Buffered Lidocaine Versus Topical EMLA for Local Anesthesia Before Lumbar Puncture in Children (JTIP)
A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial of Jet Injection of 1% Buffered Lidocaine Versus Topical EMLA for Local Anesthesia Before Lumbar Puncture in Children
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Lumbar punctures are a common procedure performed in children in the emergency department. In febrile infants they are frequently performed as part of a sepsis evaluation, and in older children they are used in the evaluation of possible meningitis, new seizures, altered mental status and other neurologic emergencies.
Several studies in the pediatric emergency medicine literature have found a positive association between lumbar puncture success and the use of local anesthesia in infant lumbar punctures. Despite this data, studies have shown that 70-76% of lumbar punctures in the emergency department are performed without any form of pain management, with up to 95% of infants receiving no form of pain management. Common reasoning for providers to forgo pain management include the time for topical anesthetics to be effective (30-45 minutes), the pain already associated with injectable lidocaine, and obscuring of anatomic landmarks with injectable lidocaine.
A recent development in pain management for pediatric procedures is the use of needle-free jet injection of lidocaine. One such device is the J-Tip, which uses a compressed carbon dioxide (CO2) cartridge to deliver medication to the subcutaneous tissues to a depth of 5-8 mm in 0.2 seconds. It has been shown to be largely pain-free for children. Multiple studies have shown it to be effective in reducing pain associated with peripheral IV placement in children. The J-Tip has recently been approved for peripheral IV starts in the Children's Hospital Colorado emergency department.
Some hospitals anecdotally report using the device for lumbar punctures, but to date no randomized studies have evaluated its effectiveness in pain management compared to other methods. Our study aims to evaluate the efficacy of the J-Tip in lumbar punctures. It offers the advantage of providing much faster anesthesia compared to topical creams, yet does not require the initial skin puncture of injectable lidocaine. If a rapid form of local anesthesia is available, it may increase the overall use of local anesthesia and improve pain management in the pediatric population.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Colorado
-
Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
- Children's Hospital Colorado
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- age ≤4 months or 4-18 years
- ability to report VAS for patients 4-18 years
- require lumbar puncture as part of their clinical care
Exclusion Criteria:
- ages 5-47 months
- developmental delay or inability to complete VAS in older patients
- allergy to lidocaine
- requirement of sedation for procedure
- pre-procedural analgesia treatment except for nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and acetaminophen.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Lidocaine Injection
0.5 mL (5mg) of 1% lidocaine injection given with the J-Tip
|
Used once for both arms prior to lumbar puncture.
The Experimental arm will receive 0.5 mL (5mg) of 1% Lidocaine.
The Active Comparator arm will receive normal saline.
This will occur after the cream has been placed for 30 minutes and wiped away and prior to the lumbar puncture.
Other Names:
In the Active Comparator arm, lidocaine 2.5% and prilocaine 2.5% cream placed over area where lumbar puncture will occur for at least 30 minutes.
This same procedure will occur for the Experimental arm with a placebo cream instead.
This will occur once prior to the J-Tip injection and lumbar puncture.
Other Names:
5 mg given via J-Tip once, repeat dosing as needed in the Experimental group.
A placebo will be given in the Active Comparator group.
|
|
Active Comparator: lidocaine 2.5% and prilocaine 2.5% (EMLA) Cream
Patients in this arm will receive 1g EMLA cream if they are in the younger age group and 10g EMLA cream if they are in the older age group.
This will be placed for a minimum of 30 minutes.
|
Used once for both arms prior to lumbar puncture.
The Experimental arm will receive 0.5 mL (5mg) of 1% Lidocaine.
The Active Comparator arm will receive normal saline.
This will occur after the cream has been placed for 30 minutes and wiped away and prior to the lumbar puncture.
Other Names:
In the Active Comparator arm, lidocaine 2.5% and prilocaine 2.5% cream placed over area where lumbar puncture will occur for at least 30 minutes.
This same procedure will occur for the Experimental arm with a placebo cream instead.
This will occur once prior to the J-Tip injection and lumbar puncture.
Other Names:
5 mg given via J-Tip once, repeat dosing as needed in the Experimental group.
A placebo will be given in the Active Comparator group.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Pain Score
Time Frame: Immediately Post-Procedure
|
The pain score was assessed using the 5-point Neonatal Coding System (NFCS) on a scale of 0-5, with 0 indicating no pain and 5 the highest level of pain.
|
Immediately Post-Procedure
|
|
Pain Score
Time Frame: At Needle Insertion
|
The pain score was assessed using the 5-point Neonatal Coding System (NFCS) on a scale of 0-5, with 0 indicating no pain and 5 the highest level of pain.
|
At Needle Insertion
|
|
Pain Score
Time Frame: At time J-TIP is used
|
The pain score was assessed using the 5-point Neonatal Coding System (NFCS) on a scale of 0-5, with 0 indicating no pain and 5 the highest level of pain.
|
At time J-TIP is used
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Lumbar Puncture Success
Time Frame: Immediately following lumbar puncture
|
The success of lumbar puncture was defined as obtaining Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) on the first attempt and <1000 Red Blood Cells/millimeter cubed
|
Immediately following lumbar puncture
|
|
Change in Heart Rate
Time Frame: At 5 specific points during the procedure
|
Heart rate was measured at 5 points in time (pre-procedure, application of J-Tip, at LP needle insertion, while the needle is in place, and post-procedure) and was compared for significant differences
|
At 5 specific points during the procedure
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Ryan Caltagirone, MD, Children's Hospital Colorado and University of Colorado Denver
- Principal Investigator: Kathleen Adelgais, MD, MPH, Children's Hospital Colorado and University of Colorado Denver
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Jimenez N, Bradford H, Seidel KD, Sousa M, Lynn AM. A comparison of a needle-free injection system for local anesthesia versus EMLA for intravenous catheter insertion in the pediatric patient. Anesth Analg. 2006 Feb;102(2):411-4. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000194293.10549.62.
- Spanos S, Booth R, Koenig H, Sikes K, Gracely E, Kim IK. Jet Injection of 1% buffered lidocaine versus topical ELA-Max for anesthesia before peripheral intravenous catheterization in children: a randomized controlled trial. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2008 Aug;24(8):511-5. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31816a8d5b.
- Tomlinson D, von Baeyer CL, Stinson JN, Sung L. A systematic review of faces scales for the self-report of pain intensity in children. Pediatrics. 2010 Nov;126(5):e1168-98. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-1609. Epub 2010 Oct 4.
- Powell CV, Kelly AM, Williams A. Determining the minimum clinically significant difference in visual analog pain score for children. Ann Emerg Med. 2001 Jan;37(1):28-31. doi: 10.1067/mem.2001.111517.
- Fein D, Avner JR, Khine H. Pattern of pain management during lumbar puncture in children. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2010 May;26(5):357-60. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3181db2026.
- Baxter AL, Welch JC, Burke BL, Isaacman DJ. Pain, position, and stylet styles: infant lumbar puncture practices of pediatric emergency attending physicians. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2004 Dec;20(12):816-20. doi: 10.1097/01.pec.0000148030.99339.fe.
- Quinn M, Carraccio C, Sacchetti A. Pain, punctures, and pediatricians. Pediatr Emerg Care. 1993 Feb;9(1):12-4. doi: 10.1097/00006565-199302000-00005. No abstract available.
- Baxter AL, Fisher RG, Burke BL, Goldblatt SS, Isaacman DJ, Lawson ML. Local anesthetic and stylet styles: factors associated with resident lumbar puncture success. Pediatrics. 2006 Mar;117(3):876-81. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-0519. Erratum In: Pediatrics. 2006 May;117(5):1870.
- Nigrovic LE, Kuppermann N, Neuman MI. Risk factors for traumatic or unsuccessful lumbar punctures in children. Ann Emerg Med. 2007 Jun;49(6):762-71. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.10.018. Epub 2007 Feb 23.
- Kaur G, Gupta P, Kumar A. A randomized trial of eutectic mixture of local anesthetics during lumbar puncture in newborns. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003 Nov;157(11):1065-70. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.157.11.1065.
- Rushforth JA, Levene MI. Behavioural response to pain in healthy neonates. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1994 May;70(3):F174-6. doi: 10.1136/fn.70.3.f174.
- Grunau RVE, Craig KD. Pain expression in neonates: facial action and cry. Pain. 1987 Mar;28(3):395-410. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(87)90073-X.
- Caltagirone R, Raghavan VR, Adelgais K, Roosevelt GE. A Randomized Double Blind Trial of Needle-free Injected Lidocaine Versus Topical Anesthesia for Infant Lumbar Puncture. Acad Emerg Med. 2018 Mar;25(3):310-316. doi: 10.1111/acem.13351. Epub 2017 Dec 26.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Wounds and Injuries
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Anti-Arrhythmia Agents
- Central Nervous System Depressants
- Peripheral Nervous System Agents
- Sensory System Agents
- Anesthetics
- Membrane Transport Modulators
- Anesthetics, Local
- Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel Blockers
- Sodium Channel Blockers
- Anesthetics, Combined
- Lidocaine
- Lidocaine, Prilocaine Drug Combination
Other Study ID Numbers
- 12-0542
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Lumbar Puncture
-
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical CenterTerminated
-
Thomas Jefferson UniversityMayo ClinicCompleted
-
University Hospital, Strasbourg, FranceCompleted
-
Injeq LtdCompleted
-
Seattle Children's HospitalLife Sciences Development FundUnknown
-
Boston Children's HospitalCompletedTraumatic Lumbar PunctureUnited States
-
University of Alabama at BirminghamCompletedPediatric Lumbar PunctureUnited States
-
Columbia UniversityCompletedInfant Lumbar PunctureUnited States
-
Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaActive, not recruiting
-
Injeq LtdCompletedPediatric Lumbar PunctureFinland
Clinical Trials on J-Tip
-
Seoul National University HospitalCompletedCatheterization, Central VenousKorea, Republic of
-
Northwestern UniversityRecruitingEvaluate Patient Comfort Level During Paracentesis by Numbing Skin With a Needle-less Device, Instead of Using a Needle to Numb the SkinUnited States
-
Children's Hospital Medical Center, CincinnatiWithdrawn
-
Orlando Health, Inc.Completed
-
Phoenix Children's HospitalCompleted
-
Radboud University Medical CenterCanisius-Wilhelmina Hospital; Johnson & Johnson Medical BV, The NetherlandsCompletedArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeNetherlands
-
Universidade Norte do ParanáCompletedMuscle Performance | Photobiomodulation TherapyBrazil
-
International AIDS Vaccine InitiativeBrigham and Women's Hospital; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center; Rockefeller UniversityCompletedHIV-1-infectionUnited States, Uganda, Kenya, Rwanda, South Africa
-
University of FloridaFlorida Probe CorporationCompletedPeriodontitis | Diagnoses DiseaseUnited States
-
Instituto Mexicano del Seguro SocialCompletedUrinary Complications | Kidney Transplant | Double J StentMexico