Jet Injection of 1% Buffered Lidocaine Versus Topical EMLA for Local Anesthesia Before Lumbar Puncture in Children (JTIP)

June 19, 2019 updated by: University of Colorado, Denver

A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial of Jet Injection of 1% Buffered Lidocaine Versus Topical EMLA for Local Anesthesia Before Lumbar Puncture in Children

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a needle-free jet-injection system with 1% buffered lidocaine for local anesthesia for lumbar punctures compared to a topical anesthetic agent. Our hypothesis is: A needle-free jet-injection system (J-Tip) with 1% lidocaine will provide local anesthesia that is comparable to that of a topical anesthetic agent (EMLA cream) when performing lumbar punctures in children.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Detailed Description

Lumbar punctures are a common procedure performed in children in the emergency department. In febrile infants they are frequently performed as part of a sepsis evaluation, and in older children they are used in the evaluation of possible meningitis, new seizures, altered mental status and other neurologic emergencies.

Several studies in the pediatric emergency medicine literature have found a positive association between lumbar puncture success and the use of local anesthesia in infant lumbar punctures. Despite this data, studies have shown that 70-76% of lumbar punctures in the emergency department are performed without any form of pain management, with up to 95% of infants receiving no form of pain management. Common reasoning for providers to forgo pain management include the time for topical anesthetics to be effective (30-45 minutes), the pain already associated with injectable lidocaine, and obscuring of anatomic landmarks with injectable lidocaine.

A recent development in pain management for pediatric procedures is the use of needle-free jet injection of lidocaine. One such device is the J-Tip, which uses a compressed carbon dioxide (CO2) cartridge to deliver medication to the subcutaneous tissues to a depth of 5-8 mm in 0.2 seconds. It has been shown to be largely pain-free for children. Multiple studies have shown it to be effective in reducing pain associated with peripheral IV placement in children. The J-Tip has recently been approved for peripheral IV starts in the Children's Hospital Colorado emergency department.

Some hospitals anecdotally report using the device for lumbar punctures, but to date no randomized studies have evaluated its effectiveness in pain management compared to other methods. Our study aims to evaluate the efficacy of the J-Tip in lumbar punctures. It offers the advantage of providing much faster anesthesia compared to topical creams, yet does not require the initial skin puncture of injectable lidocaine. If a rapid form of local anesthesia is available, it may increase the overall use of local anesthesia and improve pain management in the pediatric population.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

66

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Colorado
      • Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
        • Children's Hospital Colorado

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 14 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age ≤4 months or 4-18 years
  • ability to report VAS for patients 4-18 years
  • require lumbar puncture as part of their clinical care

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ages 5-47 months
  • developmental delay or inability to complete VAS in older patients
  • allergy to lidocaine
  • requirement of sedation for procedure
  • pre-procedural analgesia treatment except for nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and acetaminophen.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Lidocaine Injection
0.5 mL (5mg) of 1% lidocaine injection given with the J-Tip
Used once for both arms prior to lumbar puncture. The Experimental arm will receive 0.5 mL (5mg) of 1% Lidocaine. The Active Comparator arm will receive normal saline. This will occur after the cream has been placed for 30 minutes and wiped away and prior to the lumbar puncture.
Other Names:
  • Needle-free jet-injection system
In the Active Comparator arm, lidocaine 2.5% and prilocaine 2.5% cream placed over area where lumbar puncture will occur for at least 30 minutes. This same procedure will occur for the Experimental arm with a placebo cream instead. This will occur once prior to the J-Tip injection and lumbar puncture.
Other Names:
  • EMLA Cream
5 mg given via J-Tip once, repeat dosing as needed in the Experimental group. A placebo will be given in the Active Comparator group.
Active Comparator: lidocaine 2.5% and prilocaine 2.5% (EMLA) Cream
Patients in this arm will receive 1g EMLA cream if they are in the younger age group and 10g EMLA cream if they are in the older age group. This will be placed for a minimum of 30 minutes.
Used once for both arms prior to lumbar puncture. The Experimental arm will receive 0.5 mL (5mg) of 1% Lidocaine. The Active Comparator arm will receive normal saline. This will occur after the cream has been placed for 30 minutes and wiped away and prior to the lumbar puncture.
Other Names:
  • Needle-free jet-injection system
In the Active Comparator arm, lidocaine 2.5% and prilocaine 2.5% cream placed over area where lumbar puncture will occur for at least 30 minutes. This same procedure will occur for the Experimental arm with a placebo cream instead. This will occur once prior to the J-Tip injection and lumbar puncture.
Other Names:
  • EMLA Cream
5 mg given via J-Tip once, repeat dosing as needed in the Experimental group. A placebo will be given in the Active Comparator group.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Score
Time Frame: Immediately Post-Procedure
The pain score was assessed using the 5-point Neonatal Coding System (NFCS) on a scale of 0-5, with 0 indicating no pain and 5 the highest level of pain.
Immediately Post-Procedure
Pain Score
Time Frame: At Needle Insertion
The pain score was assessed using the 5-point Neonatal Coding System (NFCS) on a scale of 0-5, with 0 indicating no pain and 5 the highest level of pain.
At Needle Insertion
Pain Score
Time Frame: At time J-TIP is used
The pain score was assessed using the 5-point Neonatal Coding System (NFCS) on a scale of 0-5, with 0 indicating no pain and 5 the highest level of pain.
At time J-TIP is used

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Lumbar Puncture Success
Time Frame: Immediately following lumbar puncture
The success of lumbar puncture was defined as obtaining Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) on the first attempt and <1000 Red Blood Cells/millimeter cubed
Immediately following lumbar puncture
Change in Heart Rate
Time Frame: At 5 specific points during the procedure
Heart rate was measured at 5 points in time (pre-procedure, application of J-Tip, at LP needle insertion, while the needle is in place, and post-procedure) and was compared for significant differences
At 5 specific points during the procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ryan Caltagirone, MD, Children's Hospital Colorado and University of Colorado Denver
  • Principal Investigator: Kathleen Adelgais, MD, MPH, Children's Hospital Colorado and University of Colorado Denver

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 25, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 26, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

June 27, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 21, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 19, 2019

Last Verified

June 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lumbar Puncture

Clinical Trials on J-Tip

Subscribe