Effects of Denosumab on Periprosthetic Bone After Total Hip Arthroplasty

April 4, 2017 updated by: Hans Mallmin

Uncemented Total Hip Implant and Subcutaneous Injections of Denosumab for Patients With Osteoarthritis of the Hip. A Randomized Double Blind Placebo Controlled Study on the Effects on Bone Evaluated With DXA, PET/CT and Biochemical Markers

The primary objective is to study the effect of Denosumab on Bone Mineral Density, Standardised Uptake Value and bone metabolism in patients with total hip arthroplasty. The primary hypothesis is to demonstrate that Denosumab is superior to placebo.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

A clinical study with 64 patients, age 35-65 years, with unilateral osteoarthritis of the hip, randomised to two groups of patients, either receiving Denosumab or placebo

The patients will operated with an uncemented total hip arthroplasty with a Continuum acetabular cup with trabecular surface (Tantalum) and longevity Highly Cross-linked Polyethylene liner, Zimmer, Warsaw, IN, USA, and a CFP femoral stem with Titanium surface and a chrome cobalt 28 mm head, Waldemar Link, Hamburg, Germany.

Clinical outcome evaluated by Harris Hip Score and EQ-5D, Bone Mineral Density by DXA, Standardised Uptake Value of Fluoride tracer, by PET/CT and biochemical markers for bone formation and bone resorption will be analyzed together with conventional radiology for implant position and fixation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

64

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Uppsala, Sweden
        • Department of orthopedics

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

35 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. male or female patient 35-65 years of age with an unilateral OAH requiring a THA and a healthy contralateral hip
  2. body weight ≤110 kg or body mass index (BMI) ≤35 kg/m2
  3. living in the Uppsala County
  4. the eligible patients should have been given oral information, a written Patient Information and signed an Informed Consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. on or previously have had bone-specific treatment, e.g. bisphosphonates, raloxifene, parathyroid hormone, strontium ranelate, during the last five years
  2. patients on systemical corticosteroid for more than 3 months should not be considered
  3. patients with diagnosed malignant disease during the last five years or known to have metastasis from malignant disease should be excluded
  4. patients with compromised general conditions and an American Society of Anesthesiologists, ASA-score >31 should not be regarded eligible
  5. patients with known drug or alcohol abuse or regarded as socially dysfunctional, as judged by the investigator, should not be considered for the study
  6. pregnant women or women planning for pregnancy or fertile women (premenopausal) without contraceptives should not be accepted for the study
  7. patients that have been exposed frequently and/or have had large irradiation doses, as judged by the investigator, must not be included in the study.
  8. enrolled in either another investigational drug study, in another investigational device study, or in another investigational study of an approved drug within 30 days prior to Visit 1 of the current study
  9. any condition or laboratory findings which in the opinion of the Investigator makes the patient unsuitable for inclusion (for example claustrophobia)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Denosumab
1 ml (60 mg) subcutaneous injection Denosumab give in the posterior part of the upper arm after surgery followed by another injection 6 months later
Two doses of 60 mg in a solution of 1 ml, given as an subcutaneous injection with a 6 month interval
Other Names:
  • Prolia
Placebo Comparator: saline
1 ml subcutaneous injection 0.9% saline give in the posterior part of the upper arm after surgery followed by another injection 6 months later
Two doses of 60 mg in a solution of 1 ml, given as an subcutaneous injection with a 6 month interval
Other Names:
  • Prolia

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Bone Mineral Density
Time Frame: 12 months
Bone mineral density by DXA in Gruen Zone 7 and a sum of Gruen zone 1-7
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Bone mineral Density
Time Frame: 24 months
BMD, g/cm2, adjacent to the femur implant for Gruen Zone 1-7, 3, 6, and 24 months after surgery
24 months
Standardised Uptake value
Time Frame: 6 months
fluoride isotope uptake, measured as (SUV), adjacent to the femoral stem, 3 and 6 months after surgery.
6 months
Standardised Uptake value
Time Frame: 6 months
fluoride isotope uptake, measured as SUV adjacent to the acetabular cup 3 and 6 months after surgery
6 months
Bone Mineral density
Time Frame: 24 months
BMD adjacent to the acetabular cup during the follow up period, i.e. after 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
24 months
Bone Mineral Density
Time Frame: 24 months
BMD at the lumbar spine and at the contra lateral nonoperated hip 6, 12 and 24 months after surgery
24 months
Standardised Uptake Value
Time Frame: 6 months
Fluoride isotope uptake measured as SUV at the lumbar spine and at the contra lateral nonoperated hip after 3 and 6 months
6 months
Biochemical markers for bone metabolism
Time Frame: 24 months
biochemical markers for bone turnover and the relation to SUV and BMD findings at the proximal femur and acetabulum during the follow up period, i.e. 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after surgery
24 months
Biochemical markers for bone metabolism in relation to Bone Mineral Density and Standardised Uptake Value
Time Frame: 24
biochemical markers for bone turnover and the relation to SUV and BMD findings at anatomical sites not exposed to surgery, i.e. the lumbar spine and the contra lateral hip 3 and 6 months after surgery
24
Biochemical markers for bone metabolism in relation to Bone Mineral Density and Standardised Uptake Value
Time Frame: 24
to evaluate the natural course of an uncemented THA on BMD, i.e. the placebo group 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after surgery, SUV i.e. the placebo group 3 and 6 months after surgery and on biochemical markers, i.e. the placebo group 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after surgery
24
Clinical outcome evaluation
Time Frame: 24 months
to evaluate the patients Quality of Life, measured by Harris Hip score and EQ-5D questionnaires
24 months
Adverse events
Time Frame: 24 months
incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs) during the study period
24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Hans Mallmin, MD, PhD, Uppsala University
  • Study Chair: Nils Hailer, MD, PhD, Uppsala University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 7, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 16, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

March 30, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 26, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 27, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

June 28, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 5, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 4, 2017

Last Verified

April 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteoarthritis, Hip

Clinical Trials on denosumab

3
Subscribe