Exercise Training With Physically Active Lifestyle to Reduce Headache and Quality of Life (HEADEX)

May 2, 2017 updated by: Marjo Rinne, PhD, UKK Institute

EXERCISE TRAINING WITH PHYSICALLY ACTIVE LIFESTYLE TO REDUCE HEADACHE AND INCREASE QUALITY OF LIFE. A Randomised Controlled Trial of the Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of Exercise Training and Physical Activity on Chronic Headache

The aim of this intervention study is to examine whether tailored exercise therapy training is effective and cost-effective to decrease headache frequency and intensity, reduce medication used for chronic headache and patients´ absence from work, improve their neck muscle force, cervical spine mobility, functional ability and quality of life, and increase general physical activity in chronic headache women at regular work during a 6-month intervention.

The intervention itself with pilot-tested upper-neck specific exercise regimen aims that patients would independently commit to train and exercise to reduce their headache, and thus increase their quality of life. In addition, reduced pain and frequency of headache may increase the objectively measured daily physical activity of chronic headache patients.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Tension-type,migraine and cervicogenic headache are the most common reasons for visits to a primary care physician among working women. Headache has major economic impact due to patients' absence from work, and pharmacy claims. Neck symptoms induce three percent of all visits to a primary care physician and 1 % of all costs in health care, and moreover, institutionalizing increase costs of treatment. Active treatment may offer cost-effective option for outpatients. In addition, there is no data showing how much headache/neck pain restricts participation in physical activity (PA) or other activities in society.

The purpose of this study is to investigate whether specific therapeutic exercises reduce cervicogenic headache cost-effectively, and simultaneously improve neck function and quality of life. The other aim is to evaluate the effect of exercises on daily PA in women with chronic headache.

The following hypotheses will be tested:

  1. Specific therapeutic exercises based on individual training reduce cost-effectively cervicogenic headache and improve neck function, and quality of life on women at regular work during a 6-month intervention
  2. The intervention increases general physical activity of women with cervicogenic headache
  3. The intervention assists them to manage the headache by way of exercising during the follow-up.
  4. Physical activity of women with chronic cervicogenic headache is lower than average in Finnish population.

The HEADEX intervention study is a randomized controlled trial. Volunteers, women at regular work and having ongoing status with chronic migraine and/or cervicogenic headache will be recruited using newspaper advertising, from the register of Finnish Migraine Society and occupational health care services in Helsinki, Tampere and Jyvaskyla. The study sample is restricted to women, as the headache is much more common in women. After recruitment, the eligibility of patients to participate is screened. In total, the aim is to obtain 120 women to participate. The two subsequent baseline assessments and follow-up of headaches with the diary between two months before the beginning of the intervention enable ensuring intensity and type of the headache and that it is chronic. Randomisation is centralised but the intervention will be accomplished and clustered in three study centres. Sample size has been estimated for the primary outcomes. The number of participant will be 60 women in treatment and 60 control group.

The 6 months exercise intervention consists of 6 supervised progressive exercise training sessions and home training program, and the participants are instructed to increase their PA. The main emphasis of the exercise program is to improve and relearn postural and movement control of neck, and later on strengthen the postural muscles. The exercise intervention consists of six supervised progressive exercise training sessions to teach rehabilitative training technique with similar home training program. Before the intervention, information on work ergonomics will be enquired and if needed, changes will be recommended. The control group will receive Transcutaneous Nervous Stimulation treatment (6 times) as a placebo treatment (intensity 0), and recommendation to maintain their PA at previous level. The follow-up is identical for both groups, and information on exercise frequency is collected up to 24 months follow-up.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

116

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Jyväskylä, Finland, 40014
        • University of Jyväskylä
      • Jyväskylä, Finland, 40620
        • Jyväskylä Central Hospital, Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
      • Tampere, Finland, 33500
        • UKK Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • women aged 18 to 60 and currently at work and aim to continue at same work at least two years
  • intensity of headache on Visual Analog Scale (VAS) has been equal or greater than 45 mm (scale 0-100) during last two months
  • Headache Impact Test TM [HIT-6 Scoring Interpretation Finland (Finnish) Version 1.1] 58/78 points

Exclusion Criteria:

  • severe degenerative changes at cervical vertebra or discus (including discus prolapse)
  • whiplash injury or injury, which is contraindication for exercise and active lifestyle
  • treated with manual therapy or physiotherapy within a previous month
  • changed medication known to affect headaches during a previous month
  • changed bifocals during previous month
  • athletic trainees (3 or more times per week)
  • alcoholic and/or drug addicts/ AUDIT The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test, Finnish version
  • mental depression

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Training group

The rationale and means for the exercise program are to

  1. Motivate and teach participants for postural and motor control and strengthening exercises
  2. Monitor and motivate to continue exercise training, and to increase their physical activity

Training is organised six times as a 60-min session during six months: two individually supervised sessions, and four following training sessions will be accomplished in groups of 10 participants guided by an experienced physical therapist. Three weekly similar home training sessions are recommended for participants. Information on amount of exercise sessions per week and repetitions of each exercise will be collected via exercise diary. To perform home training, a DVD and/or booklet will be provided to participants in the training group.

The 60-minute training sessions include a few mobilization techniques for upper neck. In detail, three different exercises concentrated on postural and motor control will be taught during the first two training sessions. Progressively, two additional exercise movements aiming at postural and motor control will be taught in the next session. After eight weeks, two muscle strength exercises utilising therapeutic rubber band will be included into the program. The aim of the rubber band exercises is eventually to achieve the load of 80% of maximal voluntary contraction. The participants in the training group are also instructed to increase their amount of physical activity progressively according to the current physical activity recommendations.
Other Names:
  • Physical activity
  • Movement control of neck
  • Muscle training of the postural muscles of upper neck
Sham Comparator: Control
The control group will receive six sessions of Transcutaneous Nervous Stimulation treatment (TNS) as a placebo treatment (0), and the participants in this group are recommended and encouraged to maintain their previous normal level of physical activity and exercise habits throughout the study without any supervision or home training programs.
The control group will receive six sessions of Transcutaneous Nervous Stimulation treatment (TNS) as a placebo treatment (0) and the participants in control group are recommended and encouraged to maintain their previous normal level of physical activity and exercise habits throughout the study without any supervision or home training programs.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline in headache intensity at 6 months
Time Frame: At baseline and follow-up after 6-months intervention
The intensity of pain caused by headache is measured with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)which is a measurement instrument for subjective experience. The participants specify their level of pain by indicating a position along a continuous line between two end-points (0 to 100).
At baseline and follow-up after 6-months intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Amount and intensity of weekly physical activity
Time Frame: At baseline, after 6-mo, 12-mo,and 24-mo
Objective assessment of daily physical activity during 7 days by accelerometer
At baseline, after 6-mo, 12-mo,and 24-mo
Health economics
Time Frame: At baseline, after 6-mo, 12-mo, and 24-mo
To evaluate the cost-effectiveness the calculations will be based on the self-reported absence from work (off work because of headache, possible disability pension because of headache), cost of medical and pharmaceutical claims for headache, ergonomic changes at work ergonomic changes at work, and adverse events of training. Furthermore, the costs of the intervention including the salaries of the study personnel, individual grants for the members of the research team, and costs related to examination of the subjects are entered to the total costs.
At baseline, after 6-mo, 12-mo, and 24-mo
Quality of Life (QoL)
Time Frame: At baseline, after 6-mo, 12-mo, and 24-mo
The data will be collected with RAND-36 quality of life questionnaires , the FACT Fatigue scale and mood, and the Beck depression inventory (BDI).
At baseline, after 6-mo, 12-mo, and 24-mo
Fear avoidance beliefs
Time Frame: At baseline, after 6-mo, 12-mo, and 24-mo
Changes in fear-avoidance behaviour will be assessed with questionnaire on fear-avoidance beliefs (FABQ) addressing the behaviour both in work and leisure (Waddell et. al 1993)
At baseline, after 6-mo, 12-mo, and 24-mo
Frequency of headache
Time Frame: At baseline, after 6-mo, 12-mo, and 24-mo
Participants keep diaries on daily basis in terms of number of headache periods and mail the diaries to the investigator every month,
At baseline, after 6-mo, 12-mo, and 24-mo
Disability
Time Frame: At baseline, after 6-mo, 12-mo, and 24-mo
The participants will complete the Neck Disability Index (NDI)questionnaire with questions of ADL functioning
At baseline, after 6-mo, 12-mo, and 24-mo

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Marjo B Rinne, PhD, UKK Institute
  • Principal Investigator: Riku P Nikander, PhD, University of Jyväskylä
  • Principal Investigator: Arja H Häkkinen, PhD, University of Jyväskylä
  • Principal Investigator: Jari J Ylinen, MD, DO, PhD, Jyväskylä Central Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Katriina Kukkonen-Harjula, MD, Rehabilitation, South Karelia Social and Health Care District (Eksote)
  • Principal Investigator: Kari Tokola, MSci, UKK Institute
  • Principal Investigator: Sanna Garam, MSci, Helsinki Metropolia University of Applied Sciences

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 17, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 3, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

July 3, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 7, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 9, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

August 14, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 5, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 2, 2017

Last Verified

May 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • R12006
  • UKK Institute/173 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Kela-The Social Insurance Institution of Finland/36/26/2011)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Quality of Life

Clinical Trials on Training group

3
Subscribe