Safety Profile of Iodopovidone as an Agent for Pleurodesis in Malignant Pleural Effusion

Iodopovidone is safe when using as a pleurodesis sclerosing agent for malignant pleural effusion, with minimal adverse events, especially reducing dose.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Background: Chemical pleurodesis is the treatment of choice in most cases of malignant pleural effusion. The literature mentions a variety of chemicals which may be used for this purpose, each with its own advantages and disadvantages. The iodopovidone has been recently studied due to the existence of some side effects of other agents. Nevertheless, there are still some questions in the literature regarding its safety and possible adverse effects. Because of these questions, we propose the development of a study to ensure the safety and efficacy of iodopovidone as a pleurodesis sclerosing agent.

Objective: The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety of pleurodesis for malignant pleural effusion using iodopovidone as a sclerosing agent in different doses. The secondary objectives are to determine clinical efficacy and quality of life of the patients after realization of the proposed procedure.

Methods: There will be a randomized clinical trial, covering patients diagnosed with malignant pleural effusion at Hospital Aristides Maltez - Bahia League Against Cancer. The research was revised and approved by the Ethics in Research of the Heart Institute, Hospital das Clínicas - FMUSP and of the Hospital Aristides Maltez - Bahia League Against Cancer. The free and informed consent was evaluated by the same authority pursuant and the study group included only those who agree to participate and signed an approved. There included patients with malignant pleural effusion diagnosis. Main exclusion criteria were iodine allergia, renal failure, thyroid disease, refusal to sign the informed consent and patients unable to respond the quality of life questionnaire. After inclusion, patients were randomized and assigned to two groups according to the iodopovidone concentration solution: 1% or 2%. All procedures were performed by infusion of the solution through a chest tube previously placed.The data analysis involved clinical measures and complementary exams trying to evaluate all organ systems and sorting through possible adverse effects, classifying those as CTCAEV. Clinical measures involved MRC dyspnea schedule, analogic visual pain schedule, visual acuity test, measurement of pulse oximetry, heart rate, blood pressure and temperature. Complementary exams were chest x-ray, electrocardiogram and laboratory tests. Such measures were performed in the preoperative, immediate postoperative, second, fourth, eleventh and thirty days postoperative. Quality of life questionnaires was applied before and on thirty days postoperative as well. After that, randomized groups were compared.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • BA
      • Salvador, BA, Brazil, 40285-001
        • Hospital Aristides Maltez

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • malignant pleural effusion
  • Recurrent pleural effusion
  • Complete lung expansion (> 80%) after puncture emptying confirmed by chest radiography.
  • Karnofsky index > 40.
  • Agreed to participate in the study and sign an Informed Consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Thrombocytopenia or coagulation disorders
  • Patients with impaired renal function
  • Pleural or active systemic infection
  • Massive neoplastic infiltration of the skin
  • Inability to understand the quality of life questionnaire
  • Previous pleural procedures
  • Allergy to iodine
  • Thyroid disorders

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Iodopovidone 1%
The patients enrolled in this arm were submitted to pleurodesis with iodopovidone 1% administration into pleural cavity.
Comparison of two dosages of iodopovidone as an agent for pleurodesis in malignant pleural effusion
EXPERIMENTAL: Iodopovidone 2%
The patients enrolled in this arm were submitted to pleurodesis with iodopovidone 2% administration into pleural cavity.
Comparison of two dosages of iodopovidone as an agent for pleurodesis in malignant pleural effusion

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety of iodopovidone as an agent for pleurodesis
Time Frame: Until 30th day after surgical procedure
The safety was assessed by mean clinical measures as MRC dyspnea schedule, analogic visual pain schedule, visual acuity test, measurement of pulse oximetry, heart rate, blood pressure and temperature. Complementary exams were chest x-ray, electrocardiogram and laboratory tests.
Until 30th day after surgical procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of life
Time Frame: Until 1 week before the procedure date and 1 month after it
Quality of life questionnaires were applied until 1 week before the procedure date and on thirty days postoperative as well.
Until 1 week before the procedure date and 1 month after it

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Efficacy of iodopovidone as an agent for pleurodesis
Time Frame: Procedure date and 2nd, 4th, 11st and 30th day after the surgical procedure
The efficacy assessment was based on need of additional pleural surgical procedures.
Procedure date and 2nd, 4th, 11st and 30th day after the surgical procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Ricardo M Terra, MD, PhD, InCor Heart Institute

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2010

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

July 1, 2013

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

July 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 7, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 17, 2012

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

August 22, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

May 13, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 12, 2014

Last Verified

May 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pleural Effusion, Malignant

Clinical Trials on pleurodesis

3
Subscribe