Nebulized Fluticasone Propionate VS Oral Prednisone in Chinese Pediatric and Adolescent Subjects With an Acute Exacerbation of Asthma

June 18, 2018 updated by: GlaxoSmithKline

A Multicentre, Randomized, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Active-controlled, Parallel-group Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of Nebulized Fluticasone Propionate 1mg Twice Daily Compared With Oral Prednisone Administered for 7 Days to Chinese Pediatric and Adolescent Subjects (Aged 4 to 16 Years) With an Acute Exacerbation of Asthma

This is a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, parallel-group study to determine the efficacy and safety of nebulized fluticasone propionate 1mg twice daily compared with oral prednisone administered for 7 days to Chinese pediatric and adolescent subjects (aged 4 to 16 years) with an acute exacerbation of asthma

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, parallel-group study to determine the efficacy and safety of nebulized fluticasone propionate (FP) 1mg twice daily compared with oral prednisone administered for 7 days to Chinese pediatric and adolescent subjects (aged 4 to 16 years) with an acute exacerbation of asthma. This study is for supporting registration of FP Nebules treating Chinese pediatric and adolescent subjects (aged 4 to 16 years) with an acute exacerbation of asthma in China.

At least 250 subjects, aged 4-16 years old, diagnosed an acute exacerbation of asthma at presentation, are eligible to take part in the study if they meet the inclusion criteria. They are randomly assigned at the ratio 1:1 to one of the following treatment groups for 7 days: FP Nebules 2×0.5mg/2ml twice daily/Placebo tablets once daily; Or, Oral prednisone tablets once daily (2mg/kg.day, up to 40mg/day for 4 days, then 1mg/kg.day or half of the original dose, up to 20mg/day for 3 days) / Placebo Nebules 2×2ml 0.9% saline twice daily. While all subjects are given Salbutamol Nebules / MDI for relief of symptoms. After randomization (visit 1), the following visits are on Day5 (visit 2) and Day8 (visit 3), and a follow-up phone call (visit4) will happen two weeks post treatment on Day 21 for collection of adverse events.

The primary endpoint is mean morning PEF on diary card over the treatment assessment period. The secondary endpoints include subject derived data (symptom scores ), evening PEF on diary card, use of rescue medications, clinic assessments of pulmonary function ( FEV1, and FVC) , clinical scoring index , patient/parent and investigator global evaluation, and use of rescue medications during the trial. Safety endpoints include AEs, vital signs, and oropharyngeal examinations, and laboratory tests (haematology, urinalysis, chemistry). The subjects are assessed for compliance on completion of diary card.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

261

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Beijing, China
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Beijing, China, 100191
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Changchun, China
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Chongqing, China, 400014
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Shanghai, China, 200040
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Shanghai, China, 200092
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Wuxi, China, 214023
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Hunan
      • Changsha, Hunan, China, 410005
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Jilin
      • Yanji, Jilin, China, 133000
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Liaoning
      • Shenyang, Liaoning, China, 110004
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Zhejiang
      • Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China, 323027
        • GSK Investigational Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

6 months to 12 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Chinese male and female pediatric or adolescent subjects aged 4 to 16 years, inclusive
  • Subjects have an established diagnosis of asthma
  • The definition of asthma. According to Chinese Guideline for the diagnosis and optimal management of asthma in children [Respiratory branch of pediatric society,Chinese Medical. Association. 2008, revised version], the subjects can be diagnosed when meeting the criteria. The diagnosis criteria is listed in the protocol.
  • The severity of an acute exacerbation of asthma is defined as PEF of 50% to 75% predicted via a peak flow meter, with a clinical scoring index of ≥2. The clinical scoring index represents the sum of the score for each of four signs: respiratory rate (0=low to 3=high, dependent on age), wheezing (0=none to 3=severe), inspiration/expiration ratio (0=2:1 to 3=1:3), and accessory muscle (0=none to 3=marked use).
  • Subjects can properly use a mini-wright peak flow meter, nebulizer and MDI with/without a spacer, and accurately complete a diary card with parental assistance, if required.
  • Subjects' parents/guardians are willing to give written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria:

  • Severe respiratory dysfunction.
  • History of mechanical ventilation due to respiratory failure.
  • Admission to hospital due to respiratory disease within the previous 2 weeks, including asthmatic exacerbations.
  • Clinical or lab evidence of a serious, uncontrolled systemic disease or presence of any disease likely to interfere with the objectives of this study, such as pulmonary cystic fibrosis and bronchopulmonary dysplasia.
  • Known or suspected hypersensitivity to glucocorticosteroids or β2 agonists.
  • Clinical visual evidence of oral candidiasis at Visit1.
  • Use of the medications below in Table 1 according to the following defined time intervals prior to presentation. The list is provided in the protocol.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: fluticasone Nebules/placebo tablet
2×0.5mg/2ml twice daily neblulized/placebo tablet, oral, once daily
2×0.5mg/2ml twice daily nebulized to treat an acute exacerbation of asthma for 7 days
placebo soluble tablet, oral ,once daily
Salbutamol MDI 2 puffs twice daily or Nebules twice daily, and can be increased up to every 4 hours on an as-needed basis, through the treatment period.
Active Comparator: oral prednisone/placebo inhalation solution
once daily (2mg/kg.day, up to 40mg/day for 4 days, then 1mg/kg.day or half of the original dose, up to 20mg/day for 3 days) / placebo inhalation solution nebulized twice daily
Salbutamol MDI 2 puffs twice daily or Nebules twice daily, and can be increased up to every 4 hours on an as-needed basis, through the treatment period.
once daily (2mg/kg.day, up to 40mg/day for 4 days, then 1mg/kg.day or half of the original dose, up to 20mg/day for 3 days) to treat an acute exacerbation of asthma for 7 days
4ml 0.9% saline nebulized twice daily

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Morning Peak Expiratory Flow (AM PEF) on Diary Card Over the Treatment Assessment Period in Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population
Time Frame: Days 2 to 8
PEF is the maximum flow generated during a forceful exhalation, starting from full lung inflation. Participants (if needed with the help of parents or guardian) recorded on diary card the best of three PEF measurements, using a mini-Wright peak flow meter in the morning before taking any study drug. Only data that was drawn from Days 2 to 8 after randomization and on or before one day after the end date of study drug was used for analysis. The outcome measure was considered missing if less than 2 days were recorded in the given treatment assessment period. Two participants from fluticasone propionate group and 4 participants from prednisone group had the missing outcome measure. Analysis was performed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with effects due to gender, age, centre and treatment group.
Days 2 to 8
Mean Morning PEF on Diary Card Over the Treatment Assessment Period in Per Protocol (PP) Population
Time Frame: Days 2 to 8
PEF is the maximum flow generated during a forceful exhalation, starting from full lung inflation. Participants (if needed with the help of parents or guardian) recorded on diary card the best of three PEF measurements, using a mini-Wright peak flow meter in the morning before talking any study drug. Only data that was drawn from Days 2 to 8 after randomization and on or before one day after the end date of study drug was used for analysis. The outcome measure was considered missing if less than 2 days were recorded in the given treatment assessment period. Two participants from fluticasone propionate group and 5 participants from prednisone group had the missing outcome measure. Analysis was performed using ANCOVA model with effects due to gender, age ,centre and treatment group.
Days 2 to 8

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Evening PEF on Diary Card Over the Treatment Assessment Period
Time Frame: Days 1/2 to 8
PEF is the maximum flow generated during a forceful exhalation, starting from full lung inflation. Participants recorded on diary card the best of three PEF measurements, using a mini-Wright peak flow meter in the evening (6:00-9:00 post meridiem [PM]) before taking any study drug. Only data that was drawn from Days 1/2 to 8 after randomization and before or on the end date of study drug was used for analysis. If participants started to take the study drug in the morning (early or on 12:00 PM), only then the evening PEF on the date of randomization was used. The outcome measure was considered missing if less than 2 days was recorded in the given treatment assessment period. Two participants from fluticasone propionate group and 5 participants from prednisone group had the missing outcome measure. Analysis was performed using an ANCOVA model with effects due to gender, age, centre and treatment group.
Days 1/2 to 8
Median Day-time and Night-time Symptom Scores Over the Treatment Assessment Period
Time Frame: Days 2 to 8
The symptoms of cough, sputum production, wheeze and dyspnoea were assessed in morning and evening, and recorded on participant diary cards. Day-time symptoms were scored while retiring to bed on a scale of 0 (no symptoms) to 5 (severe). Night-time symptoms were scored while waking in the morning on a scale of 0 (no symptoms) to 4 (severe). For day-time score, only data that was from Days 2 to 8 after randomization and before or on the end date of study drug was used. For night-time score, only data that are from Days 2 to 8 after randomization and on or before one day after the end date of study drug was used. The outcome measure was considered missing if less than 2 days were recorded in the given treatment assessment period. The analysis only includes participants with at least 2 days of non-missing symptom scores in the given treatment assessment period.
Days 2 to 8
Median Number of Use of Rescue Medications During Day and Night Over the Treatment Assessment Period
Time Frame: Days 2 to 8
The use of nebulized salbutamol (doses/puffs and frequency) were recorded on diary card in the morning and evening. The median numbers of times of use of rescue medication during day and night was calculated for each participant over the treatment assessment period. In each case, only data that was from Days 2 to 8 after randomization and before or on the end date of study drug was used. The outcome measure was considered missing if less than 2 days (that is., 24-hour periods) were recorded in the given treatment assessment period. The analysis only includes participants who have at least 2 days of non-missing numbers of times rescue medication (including zero) in the given treatment assessment period.
Days 2 to 8
Clinical Assessment of Lung Function of Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) and Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) During the Treatment Period
Time Frame: During the treatment period at Day 5, Day 8
Spirometric assessments of FEV1 and FVC were assessed at clinic visit 1 (Screening), 2 (Day 5) and 3 (Day 8). Lung function tests were performed at the approximately same time at each visit in the morning. Participants were instructed to withhold salbutamol therapy for at least 4 hour, and the highest of three FEV1 and FVC measurements were recorded. If participants discontinued before or on Day 5, then the FEV1 and FVC collected at the early withdrawal visit is included in the Visit 2. Otherwise, the FEV1, FVC collected at the early withdrawal visit was included in the Visit 3. Analysis was performed using ANCOVA with covariates of gender, centre, age and treatment.
During the treatment period at Day 5, Day 8
Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Scoring Index at Day 5 and Day 8
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 5 and Day 8
The clinical scoring index was assessed at Baseline (Visit 1), Day 5 and Day 8. The score assigned represented the sum of the score for each of four signs: respiratory rate, wheezing, inspiration/expiration ratio, and accessory muscle use. Each of these parameters were scored on a 4-point scale of 0 to 3 where 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate and 3=severe. The total score ranged from 0 to 12, where 0 indicated absence of symptoms and 12 indicated most severe symptoms. The Baseline value was the last non-missing value prior to randomization. Change from Baseline was calculated/defined as value at the indicated visit minus value at the Baseline. A negative value of change in score from Baseline indicated improvement in severity of symptoms. If participants discontinued before or on Day 5, then the clinical scoring index collected at the early withdrawal visit was included in the Visit 2. Otherwise, the clinical scoring index collected at the early withdrawal visit was included in the Visit 3
Baseline, Day 5 and Day 8
Mean Global Evaluation for Efficacy by Participant/Parent and Investigator
Time Frame: Day 8
At Visit 3 (Day 8), participant/parent and investigator were asked to evaluate efficacy globally as very beneficial=1, beneficial=2, no effect=3 or worse=4. The global evaluation collected at the early withdrawal visit was included in the Visit 3. If participants were discontinued at Visit 2, then the global evaluation collected at the Visit 2 is also included in the Visit 3 for summary and analysis.
Day 8

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 12, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

June 21, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 6, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 13, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

September 18, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 20, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 18, 2018

Last Verified

June 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Asthma

Clinical Trials on fluticasone propionate inhalation solution

Subscribe