- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01696552
Patient-specific Positioning Guides (PSPG) Technique Versus Conventional Technique in Total Knee Arthroplasty
Patient-specific Positioning Guides (PSPG) Technique Versus Conventional Technique in Total Knee Arthroplasty - a Prospective Randomized Study.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Background: Use of PSPG in TKR is a relative new technique and already widely used. PSPG, based on MRI data, fit directly into the patient's anatomy and enable total knee replacement without use of traditional invasive instrumentation. Data showing extra benefit of this technique compared to conventional TKR technique are not widely available.
Aim: To determine the safety of this new surgical technique compared to conventional TKR and whether a clinical, functional and financial benefit can be achieved.
Methods: 200 patients with primary osteoarthritis will be randomized to 2 groups. 30 patients in each group will be included in the RSA section of the study. Participating hospitals UOS Ullevål, Vestre Viken, Sykehuset Telemark and Betanien Hospital Skien. Inclusion started Aug. 2011. Clinical scoring: KSS, KOOS, EQ-5D and VAS will be examined at inclusion, after 3 months, and at the 1 and 2 year control. RSA before discharge on day 2, 3 months, 1 year, 2 years. RSA images will be sent blinded to CIRRO (Center for Implant and Radiostereometric Research Oslo Orthopaedic Centre, Oslo University Hospital) for image analysis. Standing HKA: preoperatively and after 3 months. X-ray will be taken pre-operatively, postoperative day 3, after 3 months and after 5 and 10 years. CT Perth after 3 months for measuring alignment. A cost-benefit analysis will be performed.
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Buskerud
-
Drammen, Buskerud, Norway, 3004
- Vestre Viken HF
-
-
Olso
-
Oslo, Olso, Norway, 0407
- Center for Implant and Radiostereometric Research Oslo, Oslo University Hospital
-
-
Telemark
-
Skien, Telemark, Norway, 3710
- Sykehuset Telemark
-
Skien, Telemark, Norway, 3722
- Betanien Hospital Skien
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Man and women elder than 18 years old with knee osteoarthritis
- Informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Active infection.
- Under 50 years.
- Revision arthroplasty.
- Marked bone loss which could preclude adequate fixation of the device.
- Non-cooperative subjects.
- Parkinson's Disease or other neurologic and muscular disorders
- Severe vascular insufficiency of the affected limb.
- Severe instability or deformity of the ligaments and / or surrounding soft tissue which may preclude stability of the device.
- Paget's disease
- Rheumatoid Arthritis and other systemic diseases
- Patients with rigid hip joints
- Known metal allergy
- Patients can only join the study with 1 operated knee arthroplasty
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: TKR with Positioning Guides (PSPG)
Use of PSPG (Signature, Materialise) in TKR (Vanguard Total Knee System, Biomet)
|
TKR (Vanguard Total Knee System, Biomet) with PSPG (Signature, Materialise) technique
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: TKR with Conventional Technique
TKR (Vanguard Total Knee System, Biomet), Conventional Technique
|
TKR (Vanguard Total Knee System, Biomet) with Conventional Technique
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Assessing total knee implant positioning using PSPG compared with the conventional method in TKR
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Measurement of knee implant positioning by using the CT Perth protocol
|
3 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Clinical Functional Result
Time Frame: 2 yrs
|
KOOS (Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score), American knee society score, EQ-5D and pain score (NRS) will be registered pre-operatively, after 3 months and after 1 and 2 years.
Scores of the 2 groups will be compared.
|
2 yrs
|
|
Operating Time
Time Frame: 1 day
|
1 day
|
|
|
Component Stability
Time Frame: 2 yrs
|
RSA
|
2 yrs
|
|
Cost to Benefit from a Health Economic Perspective
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Cost-benefit analysis
|
1 year
|
|
X-ray analysis
Time Frame: 10 yrs
|
Standing HKA (Hip, Knee, Ankle-long axis images): preoperatively and after 3 months. If there is a extension deficit a X-HKA will be performed 12 months postoperatively. X-ray front, side and patella 'sky view' will be taken pre-operatively, postoperative day 3, after 5 and 10 years. Alignment and possible osteolytic development will be recorded in both groups. |
10 yrs
|
|
Perioperative Morbidity
Time Frame: 1 week
|
1 week
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Stephan M Röhrl, MD, PhD, Oslo Univerity Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Principal Investigator: Justin van Leeuwen, MD, Betanien Hospital Skien, Skien, Norway
- Principal Investigator: Bjarne Grøgaard, MD, PhD, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Principal Investigator: Finnur Snorrason, MD, PhD, Vestre Viken HF, Drammen Hospital, Drammen, Norway
- Principal Investigator: Hilde Apold, MD, PhD, Sykehuset Telemark
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Valstar ER, Gill R, Ryd L, Flivik G, Borlin N, Karrholm J. Guidelines for standardization of radiostereometry (RSA) of implants. Acta Orthop. 2005 Aug;76(4):563-72. doi: 10.1080/17453670510041574.
- Ritter MA, Faris PM, Keating EM, Meding JB. Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement. Its effect on survival. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994 Feb;(299):153-6.
- Chauhan SK, Clark GW, Lloyd S, Scott RG, Breidahl W, Sikorski JM. Computer-assisted total knee replacement. A controlled cadaver study using a multi-parameter quantitative CT assessment of alignment (the Perth CT Protocol). J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004 Aug;86(6):818-23. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.86b6.15456.
- Klatt BA, Goyal N, Austin MS, Hozack WJ. Custom-fit total knee arthroplasty (OtisKnee) results in malalignment. J Arthroplasty. 2008 Jan;23(1):26-9. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.10.001.
- Fehring TK, Odum S, Griffin WL, Mason JB, Nadaud M. Early failures in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001 Nov;(392):315-8. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200111000-00041.
- Ng VY, DeClaire JH, Berend KR, Gulick BC, Lombardi AV Jr. Improved accuracy of alignment with patient-specific positioning guides compared with manual instrumentation in TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Jan;470(1):99-107. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-1996-6.
- Karrholm J, Borssen B, Lowenhielm G, Snorrason F. Does early micromotion of femoral stem prostheses matter? 4-7-year stereoradiographic follow-up of 84 cemented prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1994 Nov;76(6):912-7.
- Ryd L, Albrektsson BE, Carlsson L, Dansgard F, Herberts P, Lindstrand A, Regner L, Toksvig-Larsen S. Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis as a predictor of mechanical loosening of knee prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995 May;77(3):377-83.
- Matziolis G, Krocker D, Weiss U, Tohtz S, Perka C. A prospective, randomized study of computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty. Three-dimensional evaluation of implant alignment and rotation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Feb;89(2):236-43. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00386.
- Siston RA, Patel JJ, Goodman SB, Delp SL, Giori NJ. The variability of femoral rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Oct;87(10):2276-80. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02945.
- Lutzner J, Krummenauer F, Wolf C, Gunther KP, Kirschner S. Computer-assisted and conventional total knee replacement: a comparative, prospective, randomised study with radiological and CT evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008 Aug;90(8):1039-44. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.90B8.20553.
- Weinrauch P, Myers N, Wilkinson M, Dodsworth J, Fitzpatrick P, Whitehouse S. Comparison of early postoperative rehabilitation outcome following total knee arthroplasty using different surgical approaches and instrumentation. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2006 Apr;14(1):47-52. doi: 10.1177/230949900601400111.
- Kalairajah Y, Simpson D, Cossey AJ, Verrall GM, Spriggins AJ. Blood loss after total knee replacement: effects of computer-assisted surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005 Nov;87(11):1480-2. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.87B11.16474.
- Victor J, Van Doninck D, Labey L, Innocenti B, Parizel PM, Bellemans J. How precise can bony landmarks be determined on a CT scan of the knee? Knee. 2009 Oct;16(5):358-65. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2009.01.001. Epub 2009 Feb 5.
- Henckel J, Richards R, Lozhkin K, Harris S, Rodriguez y Baena FM, Barrett AR, Cobb JP. Very low-dose computed tomography for planning and outcome measurement in knee replacement. The imperial knee protocol. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006 Nov;88(11):1513-8. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.88B11.17986.
- Kim S. Changes in surgical loads and economic burden of hip and knee replacements in the US: 1997-2004. Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Apr 15;59(4):481-8. doi: 10.1002/art.23525.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Neurotransmitter Agents
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Enzyme Inhibitors
- Gastrointestinal Agents
- Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme Inhibitors
- Anti-Ulcer Agents
- Histamine Antagonists
- Histamine Agents
- Cytochrome P-450 CYP1A2 Inhibitors
- Histamine H2 Antagonists
- Cimetidine
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2011/7613
- 2010/2056 (Other Identifier: Regional Committee for Medical Health Research Ethics West)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Gonarthritis
-
Aesculap AGRaylytic GmbHRecruitingGonarthritis | Degenerative DiseaseGermany
-
Haydarpasa Numune Training and Research HospitalCompletedGonarthrosis; Primary | Gonarthritis | Genicular Nerve BlockTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Kocaeli Sağlık ve Teknoloji ÜniversitesiInonu UniversityNot yet recruitingOsteoarthritis of Knee | Gonarthritis | Proprioception | Isokinetic Test
-
University of NottinghamCompletedPain | Arthritis | Osteoarthritis | Physical Activity | Knee Osteoarthritis | Motor Activity | Sedentary | GonarthritisUnited Kingdom
Clinical Trials on TKR with Positioning Guides (PSPG)
-
Bezmialem Vakif UniversityRecruitingCAD-CAM | Patients Specific Manufacturing | Osteotomy, Sagittal Split RamusTurkey
-
Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation TrustStryker NordicActive, not recruiting
-
ElsanNot yet recruiting
-
Stryker South PacificCompletedArthroplasties, Replacement, Knee
-
University of TennesseeRecruitingLabor Onset and Length Abnormalities | Labor Long | Prolonged Labor | Labor; PoorUnited States
-
University of AlbertaSmith & Nephew, Inc.CompletedTotal Knee ReplacementCanada
-
University of UtahTerminatedCOVID-19 | Respiratory FailureUnited States
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisCompleted
-
Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital BernRecruitingFracture Tibia | Fracture Femur | Fracture, ComminutedSwitzerland
-
Medacta USAWithdrawnKnee Osteoarthritis | Knee Pain Chronic