Analysis of Cisatracurium Consumption in Balanced Anesthesia With 1% Sevoflurane, and With Only Sevoflurane, Using a Closed-loop Computer Controlled System Infusion.

November 28, 2012 updated by: Joomye Shehzaad, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital
The aim in this study was to quantify the difference in cisatracurium and sufentanil consumption, and its recovery period, when patients are under balanced general anesthesia with 1% sevoflurane and patients under only sevoflurane general anesthesia, using a closed loop computer control infusion. Investigators further investigated this effect on its recovery period and sufentanyl consumption.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

156 patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I and II were assigned to three groups. The patients were all on schedule for elective general surgery under general anesthesia with duration of at two to four hours. All patients were induced with Etomidate (0.2mg/kg), Midazolam (0.05-0.1mg/kg), Sufentanil (0.3-0.5µg/kg) and a bolus dose of Cisatracurium (0.15mg/kg). Patients were aged between 20 and 65. The maintenance of anesthesia in each group varies as follows: Patients in Group 1 were all maintained with Total Intravenous Anesthesia, Group 2 with Sevoflurane at 1% and propofol infusion, Group 3 with only sevoflurane. Muscle paralysis is maintained using a closed-loop computer gated infusion of Cisatracurium which kept T1 <1% by giving increasing the infusion rate intra-operatively when required. Analgesia was maintained by intermittent bolus dose of 10-20 µg of Sufentanil.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

156

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Tianjin, China, 300070
        • Tianjin Medical University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged 20 and 65.
  • Patients with ASA 1 and 2.
  • Patients for elective abdominal general surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with the following diseases are excluded, since they are known to cause generalized neuromuscular weakness:

Neuromuscular junction disorders (e.g.. myasthenia gravis) Myopathies (e.g.. Muscular Dystrophies, Rhabdomyolysis) Peripheral Neuropathies (e.g. Guillain-Barre Syndrome, Polyneuropathies) Encephalopathies (Septic and Toxic-metabolic Encephalopathy) Patients with renal and liver diseases.

  • Patients who are sent intubated to ICU after surgery.
  • Patients refusal

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Sham Comparator: Total Intravenous Anesthesia
Only propofol infusion is used for maintenance of anesthesia keeping Bispectral Index (BIS) between 45-55.
In this group the maintenance of anesthesia is maintained by only propofol infusion.
Other Names:
  • Total Intravenous Anesthesia
Active Comparator: 1% Sevoflurane
1% Sevoflurane with propofol infusion is used for maintenance. BIS is kept between 45-55 by adjusting propofol infusion.
In this group of patients, the maintenance of anesthesia is done by 1% sevoflurane + propofol infusion. Propofol infusion is adjusted according to the Bispectral Index.
Active Comparator: Sevoflurane
Only Sevoflurane is used for maintenance keeping BIS between 45-55
In this group only sevoflurane was used for maintenance of anesthesia. the dose of sevoflurane is adjusted to maintain Bispectral Index within 45 and 55.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cisatracurium consumption rate.
Time Frame: At the time of surgery.
Measurements were done intraoperatively. Investigators obtained data from the closed loop computer system, from which the intra-operative consumption of cisatracurium were obtained from each patient. Data were collected only during surgery. Each patient had different cisatracurium consumption rate, and the mean consumption rate of the patients within the same group were calculated, and compared with the means from the other groups.
At the time of surgery.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Analysis of Means of Recovery Index.
Time Frame: 30 minutes post operative.
Recovery Index was the time for the Train-Of-Four ratio (TOF) to increase from 25% to 75%. The TOF ratio was recorded every minute till it reached 90%. Time taken for each patient was from 5 to 25 minutes. Investigators compared the average recovery index of patients from each group.
30 minutes post operative.

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sufentanil Consumption.
Time Frame: At time of surgery
Measurements were done intraoperatively, from which the intra-operative consumption of sufentanil were obtained from each patient. Data were collected only during surgery. Investigators compared the average sufentanil consumption between between groups.
At time of surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Shehzaad Joomye, M.D., Tianjin Medical University General Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 25, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 28, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

November 29, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 29, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 28, 2012

Last Verified

November 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Drug Interaction Potentiation

Clinical Trials on Propofol

Subscribe