- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01740973
Risk of Umbilical Trocar-site Hernia After SILC Cholecystectomy Versus Conventional Cholecystectomy (UMBI-SILS)
Risk of Umbilical Trocar-site Hernia After SILC Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Background Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a very common procedure. Postoperative pain, especially around the umbilical port is dominating the first postoperative week. Single Incision Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) has been proposed to diminish postoperative incisional pain and improve cosmetic results, but results are not convincing and the risk of formation of an umbilical trocar-site hernia is not properly investigated.
This study aimed to investigate the risk of umbilical trocar-site hernia formation after SILC vs. conventional 4-port laparoscopic cholesystectomy.
Methods This is a cohort registry study with prospective questionnaire and clinical follow-up on 239 patients having a SILC from 1/1 2009 to 1/6 2011 vs. 478 mathed patients having a conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (consecutively from one month before and after SILC. They are matched for age, gender, date of operation, and surgeons skills (database from intraoperatively registered data). Primary endpoint is umbilical trocar-site hernia formation (operation for a umbilical hernia or clinical hernia).
The H0 hypothesis is that there is not difference between SILC and conventional.
Exclusion criteria are: death, operation for acute cholecystitis. The included patients will be sent a questionnaire asking for operation for a hernia in the area, suspicion of a hernia, and perioperative data that we do not have in the database. Futhermore those patients who suspect a hernia will be invited to aclinical exam by a medic to state the diagnosis. Furthermore we patients are asked to report if they have chronic pain and/or discomfort.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Hvidovre, Denmark, 2650
- Hvidovre University Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- SILC 1/1-2009-1/6-2011 and matched controls consecutively from the cholecystectomy-database having a lap. chol. one month before and one month after the SILC group.
Exclusion Criteria:
- death in the follow-up time
- an abdominal operation before la.chol/SILC with midline incision
- an abdominal operation after la.chol/SILC with midline incision
- primary operation for acute cholecystitis
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
---|
SILC cholecystectomy
No intervention.
239 SILC having a prospective questionnaire and clinical follow-up, if the patient suspects an umbilical hernia.
|
and conventional lap. cholecystectomy
no intervention.Patients are also mailed a prospective questionnaire and clinical follow-up, if the patient suspects an umbilical hernia.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Umbilical trocar-site hernia formation
Time Frame: participants will be followed for expected average of 3 years
|
Operation for an umbilical trocar-site hernia or clinical trocar-site hernia formation
|
participants will be followed for expected average of 3 years
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
chronic pain and discomfort
Time Frame: participants will be followed for expected average of 3 years
|
The degree of long-term chronic pain and discomfort after cholecystectomy
|
participants will be followed for expected average of 3 years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Mette w Christoffersen, Hvidovre University Hospital
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- UMBI-SILS-123
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Incisional Hernia
-
W.L.Gore & AssociatesRecruitingHernia, Ventral | Hernia Incisional | Hernia Incisional VentralUnited States, Spain, Italy, United Kingdom
-
Zagazig UniversityCompletedIncisional Hernia of Midline of Abdomen | Incisional Hernia of Midline of Upper Abdomen | Incisional Hernia of Midline of Lower AbdomenEgypt
-
Mansoura UniversityUnknownHernia, Abdominal | Hernia, Ventral | Hernia IncisionalEgypt
-
C. R. BardCompletedHernia | Hernia, Abdominal | Hernia, IncisionalBelgium, Netherlands, Denmark, France, Italy, United Kingdom, Austria, Germany
-
Hospital Central "Dr. Ignacio Morones Prieto"UnknownHernia, Ventral | Ventral Incisional Hernia
-
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU LeuvenBelgian Section for Abdominal Wall Surgery, section of the Royal Belgian...Not yet recruitingVentral Incisional Hernia
-
University of PennsylvaniaCompleted
-
Azienda Sanitaria Locale Napoli 2 NordCompletedHernia, Abdominal | Hernia IncisionalItaly
-
Medtronic - MITGCompletedVentral Incisional HerniaFrance
-
Hospital Regional de Alta Especialidad del BajioCompleted