The PulsePoint Randomized Controlled Trial

November 24, 2015 updated by: Dr. Steven Brooks, Queen's University

The PulsePoint Smartphone Application: Recruiting Bystanders to Provide Basic Life Support for Victims of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

"Sudden cardiac arrest" occurs when someone's heart stops beating unexpectedly. Each year, more than 45,000 Canadians have a cardiac arrest. A bystander can do three things to improve survival: Call 911,start chest compressions and apply a defibrillator. Together, these actions can increase survival by up to 800%. The problem is that bystanders to cardiac arrest only provide CPR in about 3 of every 10 cardiac arrest cases and AED use in about 3 of every 100 cardiac arrest cases. There are many people in the community who are trained and willing to provide help for cardiac arrest victims such as off-duty paramedics, fire fighters, nurses, etc. When a cardiac arrest occurs in the city, it is likely that one of these people is nearby, but unaware of the emergency. The PulsePoint smartphone application enables these people to be notified by the local emergency 911 service when there is a cardiac arrest near to them. It can be freely downloaded to several common types of smartphones. When there is a cardiac arrest emergency, all nearby PulsePoint users are sent an alert from the 911 service. When the phones receive the alert, they ring, vibrate and display a text message saying "CPR NEEDED". The user's current location and the exact location of the cardiac arrest are then displayed on a map. Nearby public access AEDs are also indicated on the map. The smartphone users can then go to provide chest compressions and use an AED while paramedics are on their way. A video at www.pulsepoint.org shows how this works. The objective of the investigators is to measure whether the PulsePoint smartphone application increases bystander CPR or AED use for victims of cardiac arrest outside the hospital. This project will happen in the City of Toronto. The investigators have a plan to get as many people as possible to download the application, focusing on health care professionals who know CPR. The investigators will set up a webpage that helps people download the software to their phone. The investigators will randomize 911 calls to have a PulsePoint alert sent or not. The investigators will use statistical analysis to measure whether sending an alert to a smartphone increases the chances of bystander resuscitation.

Study Overview

Status

Withdrawn

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M3H 5R9
        • Toronto Emergency Medical Services

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with 911 calls assigned MPDS code 09-E-01 (Suspected atraumatic cardiac arrest not breathing), and 09-E-02 (Suspected cardiac arrest, not breathing normally),
  2. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest as defined within the ROC Epistry Database

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Trauma (including burns) associated with cardiac arrest
  2. Cardiac arrests occurring in prisons, etc
  3. Patients not treated by paramedics because of a DNR order or signs of obvious death as per Ontario provincial paramedic medical directives (e.g. decapitation, decomposition, rigour mortis)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: PulsePoint notification
Conventional Emergency Dispatch PLUS The PulsePoint notification. In the event of a potential cardiac arrest identified by 911call-takers, data will be automatically pushed to PulsePoint smartphone application users within very close proximity to the emergency. This will be done in parallel with normal emergency dispatch of paramedics and fire fighters to the scene of the emergency. The activation radius around the emergency is somewhat variable, depending on phone signal strength, climate conditions and whether the phone is inside or outside, but is approximately 200-500 meters.
When the smartphone receives the alert data, the phone alarms with auditory, tactile (vibration) and visual stimuli (Figure 1). After acknowledgement of the alert by the user, the application presents a map and text information to direct the user to the exact location of the emergency. Using local AED registry data, the application can also reveal exact AED locations in the vicinity of the emergency
No Intervention: Usual Care
Patients randomized to the control arm will receive conventional emergency medical dispatching procedures but no PulsePoint notification will be sent to nearby PulsePoint users.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Bystander Resuscitation
Time Frame: Patients will be followed for this outcome during the interval from 911 call to emergency medical services arrival, an expected average of 5 minutes
Bystander Resuscitation is defined as the occurrence of a bystander performing cardiopulmonary resuscitation or applying an automated external defibrillator to the chest of the subject prior to the arrival of professional rescuers
Patients will be followed for this outcome during the interval from 911 call to emergency medical services arrival, an expected average of 5 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Bystander CPR
Time Frame: Patients will be followed for this outcome during the interval from 911 call to emergency medical services arrival, an expected average of 5 minutes
The performance of cardiopulmonary resuscitation by a bystander to cardiac arrest prior to arrival of professional rescuers
Patients will be followed for this outcome during the interval from 911 call to emergency medical services arrival, an expected average of 5 minutes
Bystander AED use
Time Frame: Patients will be followed for this outcome during the interval from 911 call to emergency medical services arrival, an expected average of 5 minutes
The use of an automated external defibrillator by a bystander prior to the arrival of professional rescuers. Automated external defibrillator use is defined as the application of the electrical pads of the machine to the chest of the victim.
Patients will be followed for this outcome during the interval from 911 call to emergency medical services arrival, an expected average of 5 minutes
Bystander AED shock
Time Frame: Patients will be followed for this outcome during the interval from 911 call to emergency medical services arrival, an expected average of 5 minutes
The occurrence of a bystander applying an automated external defibrillator and then applying a defibrillatory shock to the chest of the victim
Patients will be followed for this outcome during the interval from 911 call to emergency medical services arrival, an expected average of 5 minutes
Return of Spontaneous Circulation
Time Frame: Patients are followed until death or discharge from the hospital, an expected average 30 days
Return of spontaneous circulation, defined as any palpable pulse or measureable blood pressure.
Patients are followed until death or discharge from the hospital, an expected average 30 days
Survival to hospital discharge
Time Frame: Patients are followed until death or discharge from hospital, an expected average of 30 days
Survival of a patient to the point of discharge from the acute care hospital. Discharge may be to a residence or long term care facility.
Patients are followed until death or discharge from hospital, an expected average of 30 days
Survival to hospital discharge with good functional outcome
Time Frame: Patients are followed unitl death or discharge from hospital, an expected average of 30 days
The occurrence of a patient surviving to hospital discharge with a Modified Rankin Score of 0, 1 or 2.
Patients are followed unitl death or discharge from hospital, an expected average of 30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Steven C Brooks, MD MHSc, Queen's University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 12, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 7, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

December 10, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 26, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 24, 2015

Last Verified

November 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest

Clinical Trials on PulsePoint notification

Subscribe