An Automatic Notification System for Test Results Finalized After Discharge

June 4, 2013 updated by: Anuj K. Dalal, MD, Brigham and Women's Hospital

Specific Aims: (Study #1, funded by AHRQ, completed May 2011)

  1. To create an automatic notification system to prompt physicians of test results finalized after discharge.
  2. To evaluate the impact of this system on physician awareness of test results finalized after discharge.

Hypothesis: Automatic email notification will improve physician awareness of test results finalized after discharge compared to usual care.

Specific Aims: (Study #2, funded by CRICO, completed July 2012)

  1. To identify a cohort of discharged patients with potentially actionable results of tests pending at discharge (TPAD).
  2. To determine if automated email notification of the finalized results of potentially actionable TPADs affects the rate of post-discharge actions taken as documented in the electronic medical record (EMR).

Hypothesis: Automated email notification of the finalized results of potentially actionable TPADs increases the rate of actions taken post-discharge.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Failure to follow up on abnormal test results is a critical problem and is more likely to occur in the case of tests that are performed in the hospital but whose results are not available or not finalized until after discharge (i.e., pending test results). Responsible inpatient and ambulatory providers may not be aware of these test results. In a prior study, Roy et al. determined that 41% of patients were discharged before all laboratory, microbiology, and radiology test results were finalized (31% were collectively hematology, chemistry, and pathology tests, 27% were radiology studies, and 42% were microbiology results). Of these results, 9.4% were considered potentially actionable by independent physician review and could have altered the post-discharge patient care plan. Physicians were only aware of 38% of these test results. Failure to follow-up on these test results can lead to delays in diagnosis, missed treatment opportunities, redundant ordering of tests, and subsequent patient harm. In a hospital the size of Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH) with 44,000 annual admissions, physicians would be unaware of almost 2000 actionable test results per year. Automated systems can mitigate this problem by ensuring prompt notification of relevant test results finalized after discharge to responsible inpatient and ambulatory providers. Using internal BWH funding, we have developed an automated email notification system to facilitate management of tests pending at discharge (TPADs).

In study 1 (funded by AHRQ), we will prospectively evaluate the impact of this intervention on physician awareness of TPAD results. In study 2 (funded by CRICO), we will perform a chart review to determine the impact of the intervention on downstream actions taken by physicians and acknowledgment of TPAD results as documented in the electronic medical record.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

441

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
        • Brigham and Women's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Any patient discharged from selected services at BWH whose inpatient attending and primary care provider are in the same arm of the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any patient discharged from selected services at BWH whose inpatient attending and primary care provider are in discordant arms of the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Usual Care
Responsible inpatient and ambulatory physicians assigned to usual care will not receive any email(s) of patients' test results generated from the notification system.
Other: Email Notification
Responsible inpatient and ambulatory physicians will receive automated email(s) of patients' tests results finalized post-discharge generated from the notification system. Finalized results will be batched such that no provider will receive more than one email per day.
BWH inpatient clinical information systems will automatically file all non-finalized chemistry, hematology, pathology, and radiology tests, as well as inpatient and ambulatory provider email addresses for all study patients discharged. This process will be initiated using a time stamp most proximate to actual discharge time. At midnight on every day, all tests filed at time of discharge will be updated if final results have become available. An email with all finalized and pending test results for each patient discharged will be sent to the inpatient and primary care provider at this time. For patients discharged with more than one pending test, subsequent email notification(s) will be sent out until all pending tests are finalized (no more than one email per day).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent of Inpatient Providers Aware of Finalized Results of Tests Pending at Discharge (Study 1)
Time Frame: 72 hours after notification, October 2010 thru May 2011
The primary outcome will be the percentage of inpatient physicians who are aware of the finalized results of tests pending at discharge.
72 hours after notification, October 2010 thru May 2011

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent of Ambulatory Providers Aware of Finalized Results of Tests Pending at Discharge (Study 1)
Time Frame: 72 hours after notification, October 2010 thru May 2011
Secondary outcomes will include the percentage of ambulatory physicians who are aware of the finalized results of tests pending at discharge (both Partners network and non-network providers).
72 hours after notification, October 2010 thru May 2011
Percent of Providers Aware of Actionable Test Results (Study 1)
Time Frame: 72 hours after notification, October 2010 thru May 2011
Percent awareness of actionable test results by responsible providers
72 hours after notification, October 2010 thru May 2011
Provider Satisfaction (Study 1)
Time Frame: 72 hours after notification, October 2010 thru May 2011
Percentage of providers satisfied with the notification system.
72 hours after notification, October 2010 thru May 2011

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of potentially actionable TPAD results with documented action(s) taken in the intervention versus control arms. (Primary Outcome, Study 2)
Time Frame: Retrospective chart data abstraction for patients discharged from July 2011 through July 2012
The primary outcome will be measured as the difference in the proportion of potentially actionable TPAD results with documented actions taken (as determined by electronic chart review) per discharged patient in the intervention and control arm.
Retrospective chart data abstraction for patients discharged from July 2011 through July 2012
Proportion of potentially actionable TPAD results with documented acknowledgement in the intervention versus control arms. (Secondary Outcome, Study 2)
Time Frame: Retrospective chart data abstraction for patients discharged from July 2011 through July 2012
The secondary outcome will be measured as the difference in the proportion of potentially actionable TPAD results with documented acknowledgment (as determined by electronic chart review) in the intervention and control arm.
Retrospective chart data abstraction for patients discharged from July 2011 through July 2012

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 3, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 29, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

June 30, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 5, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 4, 2013

Last Verified

June 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 1R21HS018229-01 (U.S. AHRQ Grant/Contract)
  • CRICO (Other Grant/Funding Number: CRICO)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Test Result Management

Clinical Trials on Email Notification

3
Subscribe