- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01794520
Study Evaluating ABT-199 in Participants With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
A Phase 1/2 Study Evaluating the Safety and Pharmacokinetics of ABT-199 in Subjects With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
The Phase 1 primary objectives of this study were to assess the safety profile, characterize pharmacokinetics (PK) and determine the dosing schedule, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and recommended Phase 2 dose (RPTD) of ABT-199 (venetoclax) when administered in participants with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. This study also assessed the safety profile and PK of venetoclax in combination with dexamethasone in participants with t(11;14)-positive multiple myeloma.
The Phase 2 primary objective was to further evaluate the objective response rate (ORR) and very good partial response or better rate (VGPR+) in participants with t(11;14)-positive multiple myeloma.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 2
- Phase 1
Expanded Access
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Antwerp, Belgium, 2060
- ZNA Stuivenberg /ID# 170067
-
Leuven, Belgium, 3000
- Duplicate_University Hospital Leuven /ID# 170715
-
-
Bruxelles-Capitale
-
Jette, Bruxelles-Capitale, Belgium, 1090
- UZ Brussel /ID# 170711
-
-
-
-
-
Grenoble, France, 38043
- Duplicate_CHU Grenoble - Hopital Michallon /ID# 126658
-
-
Hauts-de-France
-
Lille, Hauts-de-France, France, 59037
- CHRU Lille - Hopital Claude Huriez /ID# 74995
-
-
Indre-et-Loire
-
Tours CEDEX 9, Indre-et-Loire, France, 37044
- CHRU Tours - Hopital Bretonneau /ID# 126639
-
-
Pays-de-la-Loire
-
Nantes, Pays-de-la-Loire, France, 44000
- CHU de Nantes, Hotel Dieu -HME /ID# 75033
-
-
-
-
-
Oslo, Norway, 0450
- Ulleval, OUS /ID# 170707
-
-
-
-
Arizona
-
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States, 85259-5452
- Mayo Clinic - Scottsdale /ID# 75808
-
-
Arkansas
-
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States, 72205
- University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences /ID# 170002
-
-
Connecticut
-
New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06510
- Yale University /ID# 203704
-
-
Georgia
-
Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30322
- Emory University, Winship Cancer Institute /ID# 74993
-
-
Illinois
-
Harvey, Illinois, United States, 60426
- Ingalls Memorial Hosp /ID# 205346
-
-
Louisiana
-
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States, 70112
- Tulane Cancer Center Clinic /ID# 204123
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02111-1552
- Tufts Medical Center /ID# 203814
-
-
Michigan
-
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109
- University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center Michigan Medicine /ID# 170007
-
-
Minnesota
-
Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905-0001
- Mayo Clinic - Rochester /ID# 74994
-
-
Mississippi
-
Hattiesburg, Mississippi, United States, 39401
- Hattiesburg Clinic /ID# 201187
-
-
Missouri
-
Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
- Washington University-School of Medicine /ID# 76094
-
-
Nebraska
-
Omaha, Nebraska, United States, 68198-6840
- University of Nebraska Medical Center /ID# 169158
-
-
New Jersey
-
Hackensack, New Jersey, United States, 07601
- The John Theurer Cancer /ID# 200248
-
-
North Carolina
-
Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710-3000
- Duke Cancer Center /ID# 129356
-
-
Ohio
-
Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44106-1716
- University Hospitals - Seidman Cancer Center /ID# 204502
-
Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43210
- Ohio State Cancer Center /ID# 200249
-
-
South Dakota
-
Sioux Falls, South Dakota, United States, 57105
- Avera Cancer Institute /ID# 204178
-
-
Texas
-
Dallas, Texas, United States, 75246
- Baylor University Medical Ctr. /ID# 170056
-
-
Washington
-
Seattle, Washington, United States, 98104
- Swedish Cancer Institute - Edmonds /ID# 170006
-
-
Wisconsin
-
Madison, Wisconsin, United States, 53792-0001
- Univ of Wisconsin Hosp/Clinics /ID# 200246
-
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States, 53226-3522
- Medical College of Wisconsin /ID# 205229
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance score of 1 or 0. Participants in the Phase 2 portion: ECOG performance score of 2, 1, or 0.
Diagnosis of multiple myeloma (MM) previously treated with at least one prior line of therapy.
- Induction therapy followed by stem cell transplant and maintenance therapy will be considered a single line of therapy.
- For Safety Expansion, participants must have been previously treated with a proteasome inhibitor (e.g., bortezomib) and an immunomodulatory agent (e.g., thalidomide, lenalidomide).
- For Venetoclax-Dexamethasone Combination, participants must have been previously treated with a proteasome inhibitor (e.g., bortezomib) and an immunomodulatory agent (e.g., thalidomide, lenalidomide) AND have t(11;14)-positive multiple myeloma per the central lab testing.
For Phase 2, participants must have MM positive for the t(11;14) translocation, as determined by an analytically validated fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assay per the central laboratory testing (enrollment with local t(11;14)-positive FISH results only will be considered at the discretion of the Therapeutic Area MD). Participants must have evidence of disease progression on or within 60 days of last dose of most recent previous treatment based on International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria AND must have previously received at least 2 lines of therapy, including an immunomodulatory drug (lenalidomide or pomalidomide), a proteasome inhibitor (bortezomib, carfilzomib or ixazomib), daratumumab, and glucocorticoids.
- For US participants: Daratumumab combination regimen must be one of the prior lines of therapy (for this study, daratumumab plus corticosteroids will not be considered a combination regimen).
- For Non-US participants: Either daratumumab monotherapy or combination therapy is acceptable. Daratumumab monotherapy will be limited to approximately 20 percent of the total number of Phase 2 participants.
Measurable disease at Screening:
- Serum monoclonal protein of at least 1.0 g/dL (10g/L) by protein electrophoresis.
- At least 200 mg of monoclonal protein in the urine on 24-hr electrophoresis.
- Serum immunoglobulin free light chain of at least 10 mg/dL and abnormal serum immunoglobulin kappa to lambda free light chain ratio.
Participants with a history of autologous or allogenic stem cell transplantation must have adequate peripheral blood counts independent of any growth factor support, and have recovered from any transplant related toxicity(s) and be:
- At least 100 days post-autologous transplant prior to first dose of study drug or
- At least 6 months post-allogenic transplant prior to first dose of study drug and not have active graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), i.e., requiring treatment.
Meet the following laboratory parameters, per the reference range, at least once during the screening period:
- Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) of at least 1000/μL (Participants may use growth factor support to achieve ANC eligibility criteria).
- Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) not higher than 3 x Upper Limit of Normal Range (ULN).
- Calculated creatinine clearance of at least 30 mL/min using a modified Cockcroft-Gault calculation.
- Platelet count of at least 30,000 mm³ (independent of transfusion for 2 weeks).
- Hemoglobin of at least 8.0 g/dL (participants may receive blood transfusion to achieve hemoglobin eligibility criteria).
- Total bilirubin not higher than 1.5 x ULN (Participants with Gilbert's Syndrome may have bilirubin higher than 1.5 x ULN).
Exclusion Criteria:
Exhibits evidence of other clinically significant uncontrolled condition(s), including, but not limited to:
- Acute infection within 14 days prior to first dose of study drug requiring antibiotic, antifungal, or antiviral therapy.
- Diagnosis of fever and neutropenia within 1 week prior to first dose of study drug.
- Cardiovascular disability status of New York Heart Association Class ≥ 3.
- Significant history of renal, neurologic, psychiatric, endocrinologic, metabolic, immunologic, cardiovascular or hepatic disease, within the last 6 months that, in the opinion of the investigator, would adversely affect his/her participation in the study.
History of other active malignancies other than multiple myeloma within the past 3 years prior to study entry, with the following exceptions:
- Adequately treated in situ carcinoma of the cervix uteri;
- Basal cell carcinoma of the skin or localized squamous cell carcinoma of the skin;
- Localized prostate cancer Gleason grade 6 or lower AND with stable prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels off treatment
- Previous malignancy confined and surgically resected (or treated with other modalities) with curative intent.
- Known Human Immunodeficiency Viral (HIV) infection.
- Active hepatitis B or C infection.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Phase 1: Venetoclax 300 mg
Participants in the dose-escalation cohort received 300 mg of venetoclax daily on Days 1 -21 of each cycle after a 2-week lead-in period, during which venetoclax doses were increased weekly.
|
Each dose of venetoclax was to be taken with approximately 240 mL of water.
On days that pre-dose pharmacokinetic (PK) sampling was required, dosing was to occur in the morning at the clinic at approximately 0900 (± 1 hour) to facilitate PK sampling.
Dose Escalation cohort participants were to take venetoclax within 30 minutes after the completion of a standard low-fat breakfast with approximately 240 mL of water on Cycle 2 Day 1.
On all other dosing days, participants were instructed to take venetoclax orally QD within 30 minutes after the completion of a low-fat breakfast.
Tablets were to be swallowed whole and must not have been broken, chewed, or crushed.
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: Phase 1: Venetoclax 600 mg
Participants in the dose-escalation cohort received 600 mg of venetoclax daily on Days 1 -21 of each cycle after a 2-week lead-in period, during which venetoclax doses were increased weekly.
|
Each dose of venetoclax was to be taken with approximately 240 mL of water.
On days that pre-dose pharmacokinetic (PK) sampling was required, dosing was to occur in the morning at the clinic at approximately 0900 (± 1 hour) to facilitate PK sampling.
Dose Escalation cohort participants were to take venetoclax within 30 minutes after the completion of a standard low-fat breakfast with approximately 240 mL of water on Cycle 2 Day 1.
On all other dosing days, participants were instructed to take venetoclax orally QD within 30 minutes after the completion of a low-fat breakfast.
Tablets were to be swallowed whole and must not have been broken, chewed, or crushed.
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: Phase 1: Venetoclax 900 mg
Participants in the dose-escalation cohort received 900 mg of venetoclax daily on Days 1 -21 of each cycle after a 2-week lead-in period, during which venetoclax doses were increased weekly.
|
Each dose of venetoclax was to be taken with approximately 240 mL of water.
On days that pre-dose pharmacokinetic (PK) sampling was required, dosing was to occur in the morning at the clinic at approximately 0900 (± 1 hour) to facilitate PK sampling.
Dose Escalation cohort participants were to take venetoclax within 30 minutes after the completion of a standard low-fat breakfast with approximately 240 mL of water on Cycle 2 Day 1.
On all other dosing days, participants were instructed to take venetoclax orally QD within 30 minutes after the completion of a low-fat breakfast.
Tablets were to be swallowed whole and must not have been broken, chewed, or crushed.
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: Phase 1: Venetoclax 1200 mg
Participants in the dose-escalation cohort received 1200 mg of venetoclax daily on Days 1 -21 of each cycle after a 2-week lead-in period, during which venetoclax doses were increased weekly.
|
Each dose of venetoclax was to be taken with approximately 240 mL of water.
On days that pre-dose pharmacokinetic (PK) sampling was required, dosing was to occur in the morning at the clinic at approximately 0900 (± 1 hour) to facilitate PK sampling.
Dose Escalation cohort participants were to take venetoclax within 30 minutes after the completion of a standard low-fat breakfast with approximately 240 mL of water on Cycle 2 Day 1.
On all other dosing days, participants were instructed to take venetoclax orally QD within 30 minutes after the completion of a low-fat breakfast.
Tablets were to be swallowed whole and must not have been broken, chewed, or crushed.
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: Phase 1 Safety Expansion: Venetoclax 1200 mg
Participants in the safety expansion cohort received 1200 mg of venetoclax daily on Days 1 - 21 of each cycle after a 2-week lead-in period, during which venetoclax doses were increased weekly.
|
Each dose of venetoclax was to be taken with approximately 240 mL of water.
On days that pre-dose pharmacokinetic (PK) sampling was required, dosing was to occur in the morning at the clinic at approximately 0900 (± 1 hour) to facilitate PK sampling.
Dose Escalation cohort participants were to take venetoclax within 30 minutes after the completion of a standard low-fat breakfast with approximately 240 mL of water on Cycle 2 Day 1.
On all other dosing days, participants were instructed to take venetoclax orally QD within 30 minutes after the completion of a low-fat breakfast.
Tablets were to be swallowed whole and must not have been broken, chewed, or crushed.
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: Phase 1 Combination: Venetoclax 800 mg/Dexamethasone 20 or 40 mg
Participants with t(11;14) translocation multiple myeloma received daily venetoclax at a dose of 800 mg (no lead-in period) on Days 1- 21 of each cycle concomitant with weekly dexamethasone at a dose of 40 mg (20 mg for those aged ≥ 75 years).
|
Each dose of venetoclax was to be taken with approximately 240 mL of water.
On days that pre-dose pharmacokinetic (PK) sampling was required, dosing was to occur in the morning at the clinic at approximately 0900 (± 1 hour) to facilitate PK sampling.
Dose Escalation cohort participants were to take venetoclax within 30 minutes after the completion of a standard low-fat breakfast with approximately 240 mL of water on Cycle 2 Day 1.
On all other dosing days, participants were instructed to take venetoclax orally QD within 30 minutes after the completion of a low-fat breakfast.
Tablets were to be swallowed whole and must not have been broken, chewed, or crushed.
Other Names:
Tablets were administered by mouth per the dexamethasone prescribing information.
|
|
Experimental: Phase 2 Expansion: Venetoclax 800 mg/Dexamethasone 20 or 40 mg
The Phase 2 cohort further explored the efficacy of venetoclax in combination with dexamethasone in relapsed or refractory participants with t(11;14) translocation multiple myeloma.
Participants received daily venetoclax at a dose of 800 mg (no lead-in period) on Days 1- 21 of each cycle concomitant with weekly dexamethasone at a dose of 40 mg (20 mg for those aged ≥ 75 years).
|
Each dose of venetoclax was to be taken with approximately 240 mL of water.
On days that pre-dose pharmacokinetic (PK) sampling was required, dosing was to occur in the morning at the clinic at approximately 0900 (± 1 hour) to facilitate PK sampling.
Dose Escalation cohort participants were to take venetoclax within 30 minutes after the completion of a standard low-fat breakfast with approximately 240 mL of water on Cycle 2 Day 1.
On all other dosing days, participants were instructed to take venetoclax orally QD within 30 minutes after the completion of a low-fat breakfast.
Tablets were to be swallowed whole and must not have been broken, chewed, or crushed.
Other Names:
Tablets were administered by mouth per the dexamethasone prescribing information.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Time Frame: From first dose of study drug until 30 days following last dose of study drug (up to 2482 days)
|
An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment.
The investigator assesses the relationship of each event to the use of study drug.
A serious adverse event (SAE) is an event that results in death, is life-threatening, requires or prolongs hospitalization, results in a congenital anomaly, persistent or significant disability/incapacity or is an important medical event that, based on medical judgment, may jeopardize the participant and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent any of the outcomes listed above.
Treatment-emergent adverse events/treatment-emergent serious adverse events (TEAEs/TESAEs) are defined as any event that began or worsened in severity on or after the first dose of study drug.
|
From first dose of study drug until 30 days following last dose of study drug (up to 2482 days)
|
|
Phase 1: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Venetoclax
Time Frame: Cycle 2, Day 1 at predose, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdose
|
Cmax is the highest concentration that a drug achieves in the blood after administration in a dosing interval.
|
Cycle 2, Day 1 at predose, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdose
|
|
Phase 1: Time to Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Venetoclax
Time Frame: Cycle 2, Day 1 at predose, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdose
|
Tmax is the the time at which the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) is observed.
|
Cycle 2, Day 1 at predose, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdose
|
|
Phase 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve Over Time From 0 to 24 Hours (AUC0-24) of Venetoclax
Time Frame: Cycle 2, Day 1 at predose, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdose (dose escalation cohort); (1200 mg dose): Cycle 2, Day 1 at predose (safety expansion cohort, 1200 mg dose)
|
AUC is a measure of how long and how much drug is present in the body after dosing.
|
Cycle 2, Day 1 at predose, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdose (dose escalation cohort); (1200 mg dose): Cycle 2, Day 1 at predose (safety expansion cohort, 1200 mg dose)
|
|
Phase 2: Overall Response Rate
Time Frame: Response was assessed at Cycle 2, Day 1, and on Day 1 of every cycle thereafter; estimated median time on follow-up was 31.7 months
|
Overall response rate is defined as the percentage of participants with documented best overall response of Partial Response (PR) or better (PR, Very good partial response [VGPR], Complete response [CR], or Stringent complete response [sCR]) per 2016 standard International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria.
|
Response was assessed at Cycle 2, Day 1, and on Day 1 of every cycle thereafter; estimated median time on follow-up was 31.7 months
|
|
Phase 2: Very Good Partial Response Rate or Better
Time Frame: Response was assessed at Cycle 2, Day 1, and on Day 1 of every cycle thereafter; estimated median time on follow-up was 31.7 months
|
The percentage of participants with documented best overall response of Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) or better (VGPR, Complete response [CR], or Stringent complete response [sCR]) per 2016 standard International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria was computed.
|
Response was assessed at Cycle 2, Day 1, and on Day 1 of every cycle thereafter; estimated median time on follow-up was 31.7 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Phase 1: Overall Response Rate
Time Frame: Response was assessed at Cycle 2, Day 1, and on Day 1 of every cycle thereafter; estimated median time on follow-up was 8.1 months
|
Overall response rate is defined as the percentage of participants with documented best overall response of Partial Response (PR) or better (PR, Very good partial response [VGPR], Complete response [CR], or Stringent complete response [sCR]) per 2011 International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria.
|
Response was assessed at Cycle 2, Day 1, and on Day 1 of every cycle thereafter; estimated median time on follow-up was 8.1 months
|
|
Time to Response (TTR)
Time Frame: Response was assessed at Cycle 2, Day 1, and on Day 1 of every cycle thereafter; Estimated median time on follow-up was 8.1 months for Phase 1 and 31.7 months for Phase 2
|
TTR is defined as the number of days from the date of first dose of study drug until the date of their first favorable response of Partial Response (PR) or better (PR, Very good partial response [VGPR], Complete response [CR], or Stringent complete response [sCR]) per 2011 International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria (Phase 1) or 2016 IMWG criteria (Phase 2).
If a participant did not experience a favorable response, they were to be censored at the date of last adequate assessment.
TTR was analyzed by Kaplan- Meier (K-M)\ methodology.
|
Response was assessed at Cycle 2, Day 1, and on Day 1 of every cycle thereafter; Estimated median time on follow-up was 8.1 months for Phase 1 and 31.7 months for Phase 2
|
|
Time to Progression (TTP)
Time Frame: Estimated median duration of follow-up was 8.1 months for Phase 1 and 31.7 months for Phase 2
|
TTP is defined as the number of days from the date of first dose of study drug to the date of first documented disease progression or death due to multiple myeloma, whichever occurs first.
TTP was analyzed by Kaplan- Meier (K-M) methodology.
|
Estimated median duration of follow-up was 8.1 months for Phase 1 and 31.7 months for Phase 2
|
|
Duration of Response
Time Frame: Assessed at Cycle 2, Day 1, and on Day 1 of every cycle thereafter; estimated median duration of follow-up was 8.1 months for Phase 1 and 31.7 months for Phase 2
|
DOR is defined as the number of days from the date of first response of Partial Response (PR) or better to the date of first documented disease progression or death due to multiple myeloma, whichever occurs first.
DOR was analyzed by Kaplan- Meier (K-M) methodology.
|
Assessed at Cycle 2, Day 1, and on Day 1 of every cycle thereafter; estimated median duration of follow-up was 8.1 months for Phase 1 and 31.7 months for Phase 2
|
|
Phase 2: Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
Time Frame: Estimated median duration of follow-up was 31.7 months
|
PFS is defined as the number of days from the date of the first dose of study treatment to the date of first documented disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first.
PFS was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier methodology.
|
Estimated median duration of follow-up was 31.7 months
|
|
Phase 2: Overall Survival (OS)
Time Frame: Estimated median duration of follow-up was 31.7 months
|
OS is defined as the number of days from the date of the first dose of study drug to the date of death due to any cause.
If a participant was not known to have died, OS was censored at the last known alive date.
The distribution of OS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology.
|
Estimated median duration of follow-up was 31.7 months
|
|
Phase 2: Mean Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) Worst Pain
Time Frame: Baseline; Cycle 3, Day 1; Cycle 5, Day 1; Cycle 7, Day 1; Cycle 9, Day 1; Cycle 11, Day 1; Cycle 13, Day 1; Cycle 15, Day 1; Cycle 17, Day 1; Cycle 19, Day 1; Cycle 21, Day 1; Cycle 23, Day 1; Cycle 25, Day 1; Final visit
|
The BPI-SF is a pain-specific measure developed to assess patient-reported severity (or intensity) of pain (4 items) and the impact of pain on daily functioning (7 items) in patients with cancer pain.
The four pain severity items assess pain at its "worst in last 24 hours," "least in last 24 hours," "average," and "now" (current pain).
For these items, participants are asked to rate their pain on an 11-point numeric rating scale with anchors of 0 (no pain) and 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine).
The Worst Pain scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating severe pain.
Negative changes from baseline indicate improvement.
|
Baseline; Cycle 3, Day 1; Cycle 5, Day 1; Cycle 7, Day 1; Cycle 9, Day 1; Cycle 11, Day 1; Cycle 13, Day 1; Cycle 15, Day 1; Cycle 17, Day 1; Cycle 19, Day 1; Cycle 21, Day 1; Cycle 23, Day 1; Cycle 25, Day 1; Final visit
|
|
Phase 2: Mean Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)
Time Frame: Baseline; Cycle 3, Day 1; Cycle 5, Day 1; Cycle 7, Day 1; Cycle 9, Day 1; Cycle 11, Day 1; Cycle 13, Day 1; Cycle 15, Day 1; Cycle 17, Day 1; Cycle 19, Day 1; Cycle 21, Day 1; Cycle 23, Day 1; Cycle 25, Day 1; Final visit
|
The QLQ-C30 is a 30-item subject self-report questionnaire composed of both multi-item and single scales, including five functional scales (physical, role, emotional, social, and cognitive), three symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and pain), a global health status/quality of life scale, and six single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties).
For the Physical Functioning scale, participants rate five items on a four-point scale, with 1 as "not at all" and 4 as "very much."
The Physical Functioning Scale scores range from 0 to 100 and were calculated per the EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual (3rd edition), version 3.0.
A high scale score represents high/healthy level of functioning.
Positive changes from baseline indicate improvement.
|
Baseline; Cycle 3, Day 1; Cycle 5, Day 1; Cycle 7, Day 1; Cycle 9, Day 1; Cycle 11, Day 1; Cycle 13, Day 1; Cycle 15, Day 1; Cycle 17, Day 1; Cycle 19, Day 1; Cycle 21, Day 1; Cycle 23, Day 1; Cycle 25, Day 1; Final visit
|
|
Phase 2: Mean Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)
Time Frame: Baseline; Cycle 3, Day 1; Cycle 5, Day 1; Cycle 7, Day 1; Cycle 9, Day 1; Cycle 11, Day 1; Cycle 13, Day 1; Cycle 15, Day 1; Cycle 17, Day 1; Cycle 19, Day 1; Cycle 21, Day 1; Cycle 23, Day 1; Cycle 25, Day 1; Final visit
|
The QLQ-C30 is a 30-item subject self-report questionnaire composed of both multi-item and single scales, including five functional scales (physical, role, emotional, social, and cognitive), three symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and pain), a global health status/quality of life scale, and six single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties).
For the Global Health Status/Quality of Life scale, participants rate two items on a seven point scale, with 1 as "very poor" and 7 as "excellent."
The Global Health Status/Quality of Life scale ranges from 0 to 100 and was calculated per the EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual (3rd edition), version 3.0.
A high score for the global health status/QoL represents a high QoL.
Positive changes from baseline indicate improvement.
|
Baseline; Cycle 3, Day 1; Cycle 5, Day 1; Cycle 7, Day 1; Cycle 9, Day 1; Cycle 11, Day 1; Cycle 13, Day 1; Cycle 15, Day 1; Cycle 17, Day 1; Cycle 19, Day 1; Cycle 21, Day 1; Cycle 23, Day 1; Cycle 25, Day 1; Final visit
|
|
Phase 2: Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Cancer Fatigue Short Form [SF] Score
Time Frame: Baseline; Cycle 3, Day 1; Cycle 5, Day 1; Cycle 7, Day 1; Cycle 9, Day 1; Cycle 11, Day 1; Cycle 13, Day 1; Cycle 15, Day 1; Cycle 17, Day 1; Cycle 19, Day 1; Cycle 21, Day 1; Cycle 23, Day 1; Cycle 25, Day 1; Final visit
|
PROMIS Cancer Fatigue SF is a seven item questionnaire that assesses the impact and experience of fatigue over the past 7 days.
All questions employ the following five response options: 1 = Not at all, 2 = A little bit, 3 = Somewhat, 4 = Quite a bit, and 5 = Very much.
The total raw score is the sum of the responses to each question and is converted to a T-score.
The T-score re-scales the total raw score to a standardized score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10.
The [PROMIS] Cancer Fatigue Short Form [SF] 7a T-Scores range from 29.4 to 83.2, with higher scores indicating more fatigue.
Negative changes from baseline indicate improvement.
|
Baseline; Cycle 3, Day 1; Cycle 5, Day 1; Cycle 7, Day 1; Cycle 9, Day 1; Cycle 11, Day 1; Cycle 13, Day 1; Cycle 15, Day 1; Cycle 17, Day 1; Cycle 19, Day 1; Cycle 21, Day 1; Cycle 23, Day 1; Cycle 25, Day 1; Final visit
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Cardiovascular Diseases
- Vascular Diseases
- Immune System Diseases
- Neoplasms by Histologic Type
- Neoplasms
- Lymphoproliferative Disorders
- Immunoproliferative Disorders
- Hematologic Diseases
- Hemorrhagic Disorders
- Hemostatic Disorders
- Paraproteinemias
- Blood Protein Disorders
- Multiple Myeloma
- Neoplasms, Plasma Cell
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Autonomic Agents
- Peripheral Nervous System Agents
- Anti-Inflammatory Agents
- Antineoplastic Agents
- Antiemetics
- Gastrointestinal Agents
- Glucocorticoids
- Hormones
- Hormones, Hormone Substitutes, and Hormone Antagonists
- Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal
- Dexamethasone
- Venetoclax
Other Study ID Numbers
- M13-367
- 2012-000589-38 (EudraCT Number)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- CSR
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma
-
Regeneron PharmaceuticalsRecruitingRelapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)United States, United Kingdom, Australia, South Korea
-
Zhongshan Hospital (Xiamen), Fudan UniversityNot yet recruitingMultiple Myeloma Progression | Multiple Myeloma Refractory
-
Oncopeptides ABTerminatedRelapsed Multiple Myeloma | Relapsed-Refractory Multiple MyelomaSerbia, Greece, Russian Federation, Czechia, Bulgaria, Georgia, Norway, Poland, Spain, Ukraine, Germany
-
Novartis PharmaceuticalsCompletedRefractory Multiple Myeloma | Multiple Myeloma in Relapse | Relapsed and Bortezomib Refractory Multiple MyelomaUnited States
-
University of NebraskaM.D. Anderson Cancer CenterTerminatedCabozantinib as a Targeted Strategy to Reverse Carfilzomib Resistance in Refractory Multiple MyelomaMultiple Myeloma | Refractory Multiple Myeloma | Relapsed/Refractory Multiple MyelomaUnited States
-
Guangzhou Bio-gene Technology Co., LtdWithdrawnMultiple Myeloma Refractory
-
University Health Network, TorontoRecruitingMultiple Myeloma in Relapse | Multiple Myeloma RefractoryCanada
-
Massachusetts General HospitalSanofi; PfizerRecruitingRelapsed Refractory Multiple Myeloma | Relapsed Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)United States
-
Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.CompletedRefractory Multiple Myeloma | Relapsed Multiple MyelomaUnited States
-
TakedaCompletedRefractory Multiple Myeloma | Relapsed Multiple MyelomaUnited States, Canada
Clinical Trials on Venetoclax
-
Philippe ROUSSELOTNot yet recruitingLALFrance, Netherlands, Spain, Czechia, Poland, Germany
-
AbbVieRecruitingWaldenstrom Macroglobulinemia | Lymphoplasmacytic LymphomaJapan
-
AbbVieActive, not recruitingHematologic CancerUnited States, Canada, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Japan, Spain, United Kingdom
-
Thomas Aagaard RasmussenAarhus University Hospital; The Alfred; Germans Trias i Pujol Hospital; Walter...Recruiting
-
Guangdong Provincial People's HospitalActive, not recruiting
-
Dizal (Jiangsu) Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.RecruitingChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic LymphomaChina
-
First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang UniversityTongji Hospital; The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University; The Children... and other collaboratorsRecruitingAcute Myeloid Leukemia | Myelodysplastic Syndromes | High-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia | High-Risk Myelodysplastic SyndromesChina
-
Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric OncologyAbbVie; AstraZenecaNot yet recruitingAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia | Lymphoblastic Lymphoma (Precursor B-Lymphoblastic Lymphoma/Leukaemia) Recurrent | Lymphoblastic Lymphoma (Precursor T-Lymphoblastic Lymphoma/Leukaemia) Recurrent | Lymphoblastic Lymphoma (Precursor B-Lymphoblastic Lymphoma/Leukaemia) Refractory | Lymphoblastic...
-
Janssen Research & Development, LLCRecruitingLeukemia, Myeloid, Acute | Myelodysplastic NeoplasmsAustralia, Spain, France
-
Virginia Commonwealth UniversityAbbVieWithdrawnRelapsed Small Cell Lung Cancer | Refractory Small Cell Lung Carcinoma