An Open-label Study to Evaluate the Effect of Treatment With Romosozumab or Teriparatide in Postmenopausal Women (STRUCTURE)

November 4, 2022 updated by: Amgen

An Open-label, Randomized, Teriparatide-controlled Study to Evaluate the Effect of Treatment With Romosozumab in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis Previously Treated With Bisphosphonate Therapy

The primary objective of the study was to evaluate the effect of 12 months of treatment with romosozumab compared with teriparatide on total hip bone mineral density (BMD) in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis who were previously treated with bisphosphonate therapy.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

436

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Buenos Aires
      • Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina, C1012AAR
        • Research Site
      • Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina, C1128AAF
        • Research Site
    • Córdoba
      • Cordoba, Córdoba, Argentina, X5000BNB
        • Research Site
      • Genk, Belgium, 3600
        • Research Site
      • Gent, Belgium, 9000
        • Research Site
      • Leuven, Belgium, 3000
        • Research Site
      • Liege 1, Belgium, 4000
        • Research Site
      • Quebec, Canada, G1V 3M7
        • Research Site
    • Alberta
      • Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2N 4Z6
        • Research Site
    • British Columbia
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6H 3X8
        • Research Site
    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5C 2T2
        • Research Site
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 2C4
        • Research Site
    • Antioquia
      • Medellin, Antioquia, Colombia
        • Research Site
    • Atlántico
      • Barranquilla, Atlántico, Colombia, 08001000
        • Research Site
      • Brno, Czechia, 602 00
        • Research Site
      • Ostrava 1, Czechia, 702 00
        • Research Site
      • Plzen, Czechia, 305 99
        • Research Site
      • Praha 11 - Chodov, Czechia, 148 00
        • Research Site
      • Uherske Hradiste, Czechia, 686 01
        • Research Site
      • Aalborg, Denmark, 9000
        • Research Site
      • Aarhus C, Denmark, 8000
        • Research Site
      • Ballerup, Denmark, 2750
        • Research Site
      • Esbjerg, Denmark, 6700
        • Research Site
      • Hillerød, Denmark, 3400
        • Research Site
      • Hvidovre, Denmark, 2650
        • Research Site
      • Odense, Denmark, 5000
        • Research Site
      • Budapest, Hungary, 1083
        • Research Site
      • Budapest, Hungary, 1036
        • Research Site
      • Budapest, Hungary, 1123
        • Research Site
      • Gdynia, Poland, 81-384
        • Research Site
      • Katowice, Poland, 40-040
        • Research Site
      • Warszawa, Poland, 01-192
        • Research Site
      • Wroclaw, Poland, 50-088
        • Research Site
      • Madrid, Spain, 28046
        • Research Site
      • Madrid, Spain, 28041
        • Research Site
    • Andalucía
      • Granada, Andalucía, Spain, 18012
        • Research Site
    • Cataluña
      • Barcelona, Cataluña, Spain, 08041
        • Research Site
      • LHospitalet de Llobregat, Cataluña, Spain, 08907
        • Research Site
    • Madrid
      • Pozuelo de Alarcon, Madrid, Spain, 28223
        • Research Site
      • Cardiff, United Kingdom, CF14 5GJ
        • Research Site
      • Chorley, United Kingdom, PR7 7NA
        • Research Site
      • Liverpool, United Kingdom, L22 0LG
        • Research Site
      • Northwood, United Kingdom, HA6 2RN
        • Research Site
      • Reading, United Kingdom, RG2 0TG
        • Research Site
      • Sidcup, United Kingdom, DA14 6LT
        • Research Site
    • Georgia
      • Gainesville, Georgia, United States, 30501
        • Research Site
    • Maryland
      • Bethesda, Maryland, United States, 20817
        • Research Site
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
        • Research Site
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02131
        • Research Site
    • Michigan
      • Detroit, Michigan, United States, 48236
        • Research Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

55 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Postmenopausal women, aged ≥ 55 to ≤ 90.
  • Received oral bisphosphonate therapy for at least 3 years immediately prior to screening
  • BMD T-score ≤ -2.50 at the lumbar spine, total hip or femoral neck
  • History of nonvertebral fracture after age 50, or vertebral fracture.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Use of other agents affecting bone metabolism including Strontium ranelate, fluoride (for osteoporosis), odanacatib (MK-0822) or any other cathepsin K inhibitor, IV bisphosphonates, denosumab, teriparatide (TPTD) or any parathyroid hormone (PTH) analogs, Systemic oral or transdermal estrogen, selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), activated vitamin D3, vitamin K2, calcitonin, tibolone, cinacalcet, systemic glucocorticosteroids:
  • History of metabolic or bone disease (except osteoporosis) that may interfere with the interpretation of study results, such as sclerosteosis, Paget's disease, rheumatoid arthritis, osteomalacia, osteogenesis imperfecta, osteopetrosis, ankylosing spondylitis, Cushing's disease, hyperprolactinemia, and malabsorption syndrome.
  • Vitamin D insufficiency, defined as 25 (OH) vitamin D levels < 20 ng/mL, as determined by the central laboratory.
  • Current hyper- or hypocalcemia
  • Current, uncontrolled hyper- or hypothyroidism

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Romosozumab
Participants received 210 mg romosozumab administered by subcutaneous injection once a month for 12 months.
Administered by subcutaneous injection once a month.
Other Names:
  • AMG 785
Active Comparator: Teriparatide
Participants received 20 μg/day teriparatide administered by subcutaneous injection for 12 months.
Administered by subcutaneous injection once a day.
Other Names:
  • Forteo
  • Forsteo

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent Change From Baseline Through Month 12 in Total Hip Bone Mineral Density (BMD)
Time Frame: Baseline, month 6 and month 12
Bone mineral density was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Percent change from baseline through month 12 is the average of the treatment effect at months 6 and 12.
Baseline, month 6 and month 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Hip BMD at Month 6
Time Frame: Baseline and month 6
Bone mineral density was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
Baseline and month 6
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Hip BMD at Month 12
Time Frame: Baseline and month 12
Bone mineral density was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
Baseline and month 12
Percent Change From Baseline in Cortical BMD by Quantitative Computed Tomography (QCT) at the Total Hip at Month 6
Time Frame: Baseline and month 6
Cortical BMD was measured by quantitative computed tomography (QCT) at the total hip.
Baseline and month 6
Percent Change From Baseline in Cortical BMD by QCT at the Total Hip at Month 12
Time Frame: Baseline and month 12
Cortical BMD was measured by quantitative computed tomography (QCT) at the total hip.
Baseline and month 12
Percent Change From Baseline in Integral BMD by QCT at the Total Hip at Month 6
Time Frame: Baseline and month 6
Integral BMD was measured by quantitative computed tomography (QCT) at the total hip.
Baseline and month 6
Percent Change From Baseline in Integral BMD by QCT at the Total Hip at Month 12
Time Frame: Baseline and month 12
Integral BMD was measured by quantitative computed tomography (QCT) at the total hip.
Baseline and month 12
Percent Change From Baseline in Estimated Strength at the Total Hip at Month 6
Time Frame: Baseline and month 6
Total hip estimated strength was assessed by finite element analysis (FEA) of QCT scans.
Baseline and month 6
Percent Change From Baseline in Estimated Strength at the Total Hip at Month 12
Time Frame: Baseline and month 12
Total hip estimated strength was assessed by finite element analysis (FEA) of QCT scans.
Baseline and month 12
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Hip Integral Bone Mineral Content (BMC) by QCT at Month 6
Time Frame: Baseline and month 6
Total hip integral BMC was measured using quantitative computed tomography (QCT).
Baseline and month 6
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Hip Integral Bone Mineral Content (BMC) by QCT at Month 12
Time Frame: Baseline and month 12
Total hip integral BMC was measured using quantitative computed tomography (QCT).
Baseline and month 12
Percent Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck BMD at Month 6
Time Frame: Baseline and month 6
Bone mineral density was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
Baseline and month 6
Percent Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck BMD at Month 12
Time Frame: Baseline and month 12
Bone mineral density was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
Baseline and month 12
Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine BMD at Month 6
Time Frame: Baseline and month 6
Bone mineral density was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
Baseline and month 6
Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine BMD at Month 12
Time Frame: Baseline and month 12
Bone mineral density was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
Baseline and month 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 31, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 14, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

May 14, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 19, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 20, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

February 21, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 29, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 4, 2022

Last Verified

November 1, 2022

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postmenopausal Osteoporosis

Subscribe