Efficacy Study of Antimicrobial Catheters to Avoid Urinary Infections in Spinal Cord Injured Patients (ESCALE)

Multicentric, Controlled, Randomized Clinical Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Cost-effectiveness of Urinary Catheters With Silver Alloy Coating Versus Conventional Catheters in Spinal Cord Injured Patients

The purpose of this trial is to make a comparison between the use of antiseptic silver alloy-coated silicone urinary catheters and the use of conventional silicone urinary catheters in spinal cord injured patients to prevent urinary infections.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Antiseptic Silver Alloy-Coated Silicone Urinary Catheters seems to be a promising intervention to reduce urinary tract infections; however, research evidence cannot be extrapolated to spinal cord injured patients.

The study is an open, randomized, multicentric, and parallel clinical trial with blinded assessment. The study includes spinal cord injured patients who require at least seven days of urethral catheterization as a method of bladder voiding. Participants are on-line centrally randomized and allocated to one of the two interventions (Antiseptic Urinary Catheters or Conventional Catheters). Catheters are used for a maximum period of 30 days or removed earlier at the clinician criteria.

The main outcome is the incidence of urinary tract infections by the time of catheter removal or at day 30 after catheterization, the event that occurs first. Intention-to-treat analysis will be performed, as well as a primary analysis of all patients.

The aim of this study is to assess whether silver alloy-coated silicone urinary catheters reduce urinary infections in spinal cord injured patients.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

489

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Santiago de Chile, Chile, 4848
        • Mutual de la Seguridad Chilena
      • Ancona, Italy
        • Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria - Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona - Unità Spinale
      • Bari, Italy, 70124
        • Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico di Bari- Unità Operativa di Medicina Fisica e Riabilitazione e Unità Spinale Unipolare
      • Ceglie Messapica, Italy, 72013
        • Unità Operative Recupero e Riabilitazione Funzionale e Gravi Cerebrolesioni Acquisite
      • Rome, Italy, 00142
        • Unità Spinale Unipolare
      • Braga, Portugal, 4710-243
        • Centro Clínico Académico - Braga, Associação (2CA-Braga)
      • Porto, Portugal, 4099-001
        • Centro Hospitalar do Porto
    • Alcabideche
      • Alcoitão, Alcabideche, Portugal, 2649-506
        • Centro de Medicina de Reabilitação de Alcoitão
      • A Coruña, Spain
        • Complexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña
      • Cadiz, Spain
        • Hospital Universitario Puerta Del Mar
      • Madrid, Spain
        • Hospital Universitario La Paz
      • Sevilla, Spain
        • Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío
      • Toledo, Spain
        • Hospital Nacional de Parapléjicos
      • Zaragoza, Spain
        • Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet
    • Asturias
      • Oviedo, Asturias, Spain
        • Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias
    • Barcelona
      • Badalona, Barcelona, Spain
        • Hospital de Neurorrehabilitación Instituto Guttmann
    • Las Palmas
      • Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain
        • Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Insular - Materno Infantil de Canarias
    • Vizcaya
      • Barakaldo, Vizcaya, Spain
        • Hospital Universitario Cruces
    • Izmir
      • Alsancak, Izmir, Turkey, 35210
        • Dokuz Eylul University Dept. of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
    • İzmir
      • Bornova, İzmir, Turkey, 35040
        • Ege University Dept. of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female patients with traumatic or medical spinal cord injury
  • Age of 18 years or above
  • Patients who need an indwelling urinary catheter as a method of bladder drainage for at least 7 days.
  • Patients who are willing to participate in the study and give their written informed consent (If a patient is unable to give written consent because of physical or mental disability, an affirmation of consent will be taken in his presence from his relative or legal guardian).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who can benefit from other method of bladder drainage such as intermittent catheterization, suprapubic drainage, reflex voiding or use of an external collector.
  • Patients with urinary tract infection at the moment of inclusion
  • Current antibiotic use or use within 7 days prior to inclusion
  • Outpatients with sporadic medical examinations (less than one per month)
  • Known allergy to latex, silver salts or hydrogels.
  • Patients with surgical interventions in the urinary tract that may interfere, at the investigator criteria, with the study results.
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding woman.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Silver Alloy-Coated Urinary Catheters
Bactiguard® Infection Protection coating consists of noble metals such as gold, palladium and silver. Trained health staff performs urethral catheterization and select the most adequate catheter size. To ensure aseptic conditions they are asked to strictly follow the current protocol in their respective centers. Indwelling urethral catheters are periodically replaced about 30 days of use; to not interfere with current clinical practice, the policy of each center (or the investigator criteria) for catheter replacement and removal is considered valid for this study.
Other Names:
  • BIP Foley catheter - Silicone Bactiguard Infection Protection
OTHER: Conventional Urinary Catheter
Conventional or standard urinary catheters are those commonly used in each study center, most of them made of silicone or silicone-latex. Trained health staff performs urethral catheterization and select the most adequate catheter size. To ensure aseptic conditions they are asked to strictly follow the current protocol in their respective centers. Indwelling urethral catheters are periodically replaced about 30 days of use; to not interfere with current clinical practice, the policy of each center (or the investigator criteria) for catheter replacement and removal is considered valid for this study.
Other Names:
  • Foley silicona 100% (16 or 18 Ch)
  • Foley Rüsch (16 or 18 Ch)
  • Foley Bardex (16 or 18 Ch)
  • Folysil (16 or 18 Ch)
  • Foley Rochester (16 or 18 Ch)
  • Foley Euromedical (16 or 18 Ch)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of catheter associated urinary tract infection
Time Frame: at any time from catheterization procedure and 30th day, catheter removal or catheter replacement (whichever occurs first)

Is considered that a patient suffer a urinary tract infection if they have at least one suggestive sign or symptom with no other recognized cause and a positive urine culture with no more than 2 species of microorganisms.

An urinary tract infection is considered catheter associated if the specimen collection is performed at any time from catheterization procedure and 30th day, catheter removal or catheter replacement (whichever occurs first).

at any time from catheterization procedure and 30th day, catheter removal or catheter replacement (whichever occurs first)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Asymptomatic urinary tract infection
Time Frame: at any time from catheterization procedure and 30th day, catheter removal or catheter replacement (whichever occurs first)
A positive urine culture with no more than 2 species of microorganisms(collected at any time from catheterization procedure and 30th day, catheter removal or catheter replacement, whichever occurs first), and no signs or symptoms.
at any time from catheterization procedure and 30th day, catheter removal or catheter replacement (whichever occurs first)
Bacteremic urinary tract infection
Time Frame: at any time from catheterization procedure and 30th day, catheter removal or catheter replacement (whichever occurs first)
Those with the primary outcome and with a positive blood culture with at least 1 matching uropathogen microorganism to the urine culture.
at any time from catheterization procedure and 30th day, catheter removal or catheter replacement (whichever occurs first)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Direct costs
Time Frame: From catheterization procedure and 30th day, catheter removal or catheter replacement or finalization of complication(s) or related treatment(s), whichever last longer.
Calculation of direct costs attributable to the use of intervention or control urinary catheters and their complications
From catheterization procedure and 30th day, catheter removal or catheter replacement or finalization of complication(s) or related treatment(s), whichever last longer.
Number of participants with adverse events related to catheterization as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability
Time Frame: at any time from catheterization procedure and 30th day, catheter removal or catheter replacement (whichever occurs first)
Any untoward medical occurrence related to urinary catheterization
at any time from catheterization procedure and 30th day, catheter removal or catheter replacement (whichever occurs first)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Xavier Bonfill, MD, PhD, Asociación Colaboración Cochrane Iberoamericana

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2012

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2015

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 26, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 1, 2013

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

March 4, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

September 20, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 19, 2016

Last Verified

September 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IIBSP-SUR-2011-68
  • 112210 (OTHER_GRANT: La Fundació La Marató de TV3)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Urinary Tract Infection

Clinical Trials on Silver Alloy-Coated Urinary Catheters

3
Subscribe