Clinical Trial Nuedexta in Subjects With ALS

February 3, 2017 updated by: Richard A. Smith, MD, Center for Neurologic Study, La Jolla, California,

The Experimental Treatment of Bulbar Dysfunction in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)

The purpose of this study is to determine whether Nuedexta is effective in the treatment of symptoms (impaired speech, swallowing, and saliva control)associated with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Muscle weakness, the cardinal feature of ALS, leads to progressive loss of motor function affecting the limbs, tongue, respiratory and pharyngeal muscles. Symptomatic treatments such as the placement of a feeding tube, can compensate for the inability to swallow. Riluzole, the only approved treatment for ALS, may slow disease progression but no treatment is curative and none have improved function.

Unexpectedly, Nuedexta®, approved for the treatment of labile emotionality that occurs in association with ALS and other neurological disorders, has been observed to improve bulbar function, primarily speech and swallowing, in a number of neurological disorders, including ALS. The basis for this is conjectural but likely due to a direct effect of the drug on motor neurons in the part of the brain that controls speech and swallowing. The same part of the brain appears to modulate the expression of emotions and interestingly the site of action of the drug is the same as a site that has been implicated in a juvenile form of ALS.

This is a multicenter, randomized double-blind, placebo controlled, cross over study evaluating the palliative effect of Nuedexta® on bulbar dysfunction. It is expected that approximately 60 ALS patients from 7 clinical centers in the US will be enrolled.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

90

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94115
        • California Pacific Medical Center
    • District of Columbia
      • Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States, 20007
        • Georgetown University Medical Center
    • Michigan
      • Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States, 49503
        • Saint Mary's Health Care
    • Minnesota
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55415
        • Hennepin County Medical Center
    • Nebraska
      • Lincoln, Nebraska, United States, 68506
        • Neurology Associates, P.C.
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
        • The Cleveland Clinic
    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97213
        • Providence ALS Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ALS diagnosed as possible, laboratory-supported probable, probable, or definite as defined by revised El Escorial criteria
  • Age 18 years or older
  • Exhibits bulbar dysfunction manifested by dysarthria and/or dysphagia, according to PI judgment, exhibits a score of 55 or above on the CNS-Bulbar Function Scale
  • Capable of providing informed consent and following trial procedures
  • Geographic accessibility to the site
  • Women must not be able to become pregnant for the duration of the study and must be willing to be on two contraceptive therapies
  • Slow vital capacity (SVC) measure ≥50% of predicted for gender, height, and age at the screening visit
  • Must be able to swallow capsules throughout the course of the study, according to PI judgment
  • Subjects must not have taken riluzole for at least 30 days or be on a 50mg BID dose of riluzole for at least 30 days prior to randomization (subjects how have never taken riluzole are permitted in the study)
  • Subjects taking anti-sialorrhea medication(s) must be on a stable dose for at least 30 days prior to randomization (anti-sialorrhea naïve subjects are permitted in the study)
  • Must be able to safely swallow at least 30 milliliters (mLs) of water for the water swallowing test

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior use of Nuedexta®
  • Current use of dextromethorphan, quinidine, quinine, mefloquine or opioids
  • History of quinidine, quinine, or mefloquine-induced thrombocytopenia, hepatitis, or other hypersensitivity reactions
  • History of known sensitivity or intolerability to dextromethorphan
  • Use of an mono amine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI) or within 14 days of stopping an MAOI
  • Prolonged QT interval, congenital long QT syndrome, history suggestive of torsades de pointes, or heart failure
  • Complete atrioventricular (AV) block without implanted pacemaker, or subjects at high risk of complete AV block
  • Concomitant use with drugs that both prolong QT interval and are metabolized by cytochrome P 2D6 (CYP2D6) (i.e., thioridazine or pimozide)
  • Exposure to any other experimental agent (off-label use or investigational) within 30 days prior to Baseline Visit
  • Invasive ventilator dependence, such as tracheostomy
  • Any history of either substance abuse within the past year, unstable psychiatric disease, cognitive impairment, or dementia, according to PI judgment
  • Placement and/or usage of feeding tube
  • Pregnant women or women currently breastfeeding
  • Unable to turn diaphragm pacing device off during swallowing tests
  • Salivatory Botox within 90 days (3 months) of screening
  • Salivatory radiation within 180 days (6 months) of screening

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Nuedexta then Matching Placebo
Subjects in this arm will receive treatment with Nuedexta first for 28 days (±3 days) and then crossed over to receive treatment with matching placebo for 28 days (±3 days).
Nuedexta PO (by mouth) for 28 ± 3 days
Other Names:
  • dextromethorphan hydrobromide and quinidine sulfate
matching placebo PO (by mouth) for 28 ± 3 days
Other Names:
  • sugar pill
Other: Matching Placebo then Nuedexta
Subjects in this arm will receive treatment with matching placebo first for 28 days (±3 days) and then crossed over to receive treatment with Nuedexta for 28 days (±3 days).
Nuedexta PO (by mouth) for 28 ± 3 days
Other Names:
  • dextromethorphan hydrobromide and quinidine sulfate
matching placebo PO (by mouth) for 28 ± 3 days
Other Names:
  • sugar pill

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Bulbar Function Scale (CNS-BFS) Total Score
Time Frame: Average between Screening Visit to Visit 3

The Center for Neurologic Study-Bulbar Function Scale (CNS-BFS) is a 21-item self report scale that assesses three domains of bulbar function: speech, swallowing and salivation. Scores for each question range from 1 (does not apply) to 5 (applies most of the time). The higher the score, the worse the speech, swallowing and salivation (sialorrhea). [Range of score: 21-105]

The scale was modeled on the Center for Neurologic Study Emotional Lability Scale (CNS-LS) that has been a robust endpoint in four clinical trials. The scale was validated in a large population of ALS patients (n=122) and detects impaired bulbar function at a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 0.97%. Test re-test correlation was 0.92% at six-months (n=53).

Average between Screening Visit to Visit 3
Bulbar Function Scale (CNS-BFS) Sialorrhea Score
Time Frame: Average between Screening Visit to Visit 3
The Center for Neurologic Study-Bulbar Function Scale (CNS-BFS) is a 21-item self report scale that assesses three domains of bulbar function: speech, swallowing and salivation. Scores for each question range from 1 (does not apply) to 5 (applies most of the time). The higher the score, the worse the salivation (sialorrhea). There are 7 salivation (sialorrhea) questions, with a score range of 7 to 35.
Average between Screening Visit to Visit 3
Bulbar Function Scale (CNS-BFS) Speech Score
Time Frame: Average between Screening Visit to Visit 3
The Center for Neurologic Study-Bulbar Function Scale (CNS-BFS) is a 21-item self report scale that assesses three domains of bulbar function: speech, swallowing and salivation. Scores for each question range from 1 (does not apply) to 5 (applies most of the time). The higher the score, the worse the speech. There are 7 speech questions, with a score range of 7 to 35.
Average between Screening Visit to Visit 3
Bulbar Function Scale (CNS-BFS) Swallowing Score
Time Frame: Average between Screening Visit to Visit 3
The Center for Neurologic Study-Bulbar Function Scale (CNS-BFS) is a 21-item self report scale that assesses three domains of bulbar function: speech, swallowing and salivation. Scores for each question range from 1 (does not apply) to 5 (applies most of the time). The higher the score, the worse the swallowing. There are 7 swallowing questions, with a score range of 7 to 35.
Average between Screening Visit to Visit 3

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Center for Neurologic Study - Lability Scale (CNS-LS) Total Score
Time Frame: Average between Screening Visit to Visit 3
The Center for Neurologic Study-Lability Scale (CNS-LS) is a 7-item self report scale that assesses pseudobulbar affect (PBA) by measuring the perceived frequency of PBA episodes (laughing or crying). Each item is scored using a 5-point Likert scale, from 1 (applies never) to 5 (applies most of the time). Scores range from 5-35. The higher the score, the worse the PBA.
Average between Screening Visit to Visit 3
ALS Functional Rating Scale- Revised (ALSFRS-R) Total Score
Time Frame: Average between Screening Visit to Visit 3
The ALSFRS-R is a quickly administered (5 min) ordinal rating scale used to determine a subject's assessment of their capability and independence in 12 functional activities. There are 12 questions, graded by the subject 0-4 (4 is normal). Score of 0 (worst) to 48 (best). Reflects speech and swallowing, fine motor skills, large motor skills, and breathing.
Average between Screening Visit to Visit 3
Visual Analog Scale - Speech Scores
Time Frame: Average between Baseline Visit to Visit 3
Visual analog scales are useful for measuring complex clinical events and offer the advantage of self-administration and responsiveness to change over time. The scales designed for this study inventory three domains of bulbar function: speech, swallowing and salivation (sialorrhea). For each of these, subjects score themselves by indicating their level of function on a scale of 1 (severe impairment) to 10 (normal). Scores range from 1 to 10; the higher the score, the more normal the function.
Average between Baseline Visit to Visit 3
Ashworth Spasticity Scale Score - Right Arm
Time Frame: Average between Baseline Visit to Visit 3
This is a standard measure for spasticity that has been used in numerous ALS clinical trials to assess spasticity due to upper motor neuron dysfunction in ALS. Data is generated from the clinical exam and scored from 1-5, the lowest score indicating normal tone and the highest muscle rigidity.
Average between Baseline Visit to Visit 3
Timed Reading of Test Paragraph Result
Time Frame: Average between Baseline Visit to Visit 3
Subjects will be asked to read 'The Rainbow Passage' a commonly used test paragraph utilized by speech pathologists to assess speech rate (words/minute). Study staff will time the subject to determine how many words the subject reads per minute. It is used primarily because it contains every sound in the English language. Subjects will also be observed for loudness, nasality, and intelligibility.
Average between Baseline Visit to Visit 3
Average Water Swallowing Test (WST)
Time Frame: Average between Baseline Visit to Visit 3
The Water Swallowing Test (WST) estimates swallowing speed, a useful and reproducible measure. While sitting, subjects are asked to drink 30 milliliters (mL) of liquid. The time for subjects to complete this task is a sensitive measure for the detection of swallowing dysfunction and is a simple measure for serial assessment of subjects. The test will be completed three times, with the best two scores recorded to obtain an average score. Following completion of the WST, the subject's swallowing abilities (choking, spillage, and effort) will be observed.
Average between Baseline Visit to Visit 3
Visual Analog Scale - Swallowing Score
Time Frame: Average between Baseline Visit to Visit 3
Visual analog scales are useful for measuring complex clinical events and offer the advantage of self-administration and responsiveness to change over time. The scales designed for this study inventory three domains of bulbar function: speech, swallowing and salivation (sialorrhea). For each of these, subjects score themselves by indicating their level of function on a scale of 1 (severe impairment) to 10 (normal). Scores range from 1 to 10; the higher the score, the more normal the function.
Average between Baseline Visit to Visit 3
Visual Analog Scale - Salivation (Sialorrhea) Score
Time Frame: Average between Baseline Visit to Visit 3
Visual analog scales are useful for measuring complex clinical events and offer the advantage of self-administration and responsiveness to change over time. The scales designed for this study inventory three domains of bulbar function: speech, swallowing and salivation (sialorrhea). For each of these, subjects score themselves by indicating their level of function on a scale of 1 (severe impairment) to 10 (normal). Scores range from 1 to 10; the higher the score, the more normal the function.
Average between Baseline Visit to Visit 3
Average Solids Swallowing Test
Time Frame: Average between Baseline Visit to Visit 3
The Time Swallowing Test assesses the subject's ability to swallow solids. For this test, the subject will be asked to consume a tablespoon of cereal containing 5 cheerios. The subject will be instructed to close their mouth, chew and subsequently swallow the bolus. The time to complete this task will be recorded. The test will be completed three times to obtain an average score.
Average between Baseline Visit to Visit 3
Ashworth Spasticity Scale Score - Left Arm
Time Frame: Average between Baseline Visit to Visit 3
This is a standard measure for spasticity that has been used in numerous ALS clinical trials to assess spasticity due to upper motor neuron dysfunction in ALS. Data is generated from the clinical exam and scored from 1-5, the lowest score indicating normal tone and the highest muscle rigidity.
Average between Baseline Visit to Visit 3
Ashworth Spasticity Scale Score - Right Leg
Time Frame: Average between Baseline Visit to Visit 3
This is a standard measure for spasticity that has been used in numerous ALS clinical trials to assess spasticity due to upper motor neuron dysfunction in ALS. Data is generated from the clinical exam and scored from 1-5, the lowest score indicating normal tone and the highest muscle rigidity.
Average between Baseline Visit to Visit 3
Ashworth Spasticity Scale Score - Left Leg
Time Frame: Average between Baseline Visit to Visit 3
This is a standard measure for spasticity that has been used in numerous ALS clinical trials to assess spasticity due to upper motor neuron dysfunction in ALS. Data is generated from the clinical exam and scored from 1-5, the lowest score indicating normal tone and the highest muscle rigidity.
Average between Baseline Visit to Visit 3

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jeremy Shefner, MD, PhD, Barrow Neurological Institute
  • Principal Investigator: Richard A Smith, MD, Center for Neurologic Study (CNS)
  • Principal Investigator: Merit E Cudkowicz, MD, MSc, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH)

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 5, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 6, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

March 7, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 24, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 3, 2017

Last Verified

February 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)

Clinical Trials on Nuedexta

3
Subscribe