Study Evaluating The Safety, Tolerability And Brain Function Of 2 Doses Of PF-0254920 In Subjects With Early Huntington's Disease

May 8, 2017 updated by: Pfizer

A Phase 2, Double-blind Randomized, Sequential Treatment Group, Placebo-controlled Study To Evaluate The Safety, Tolerability And Brain Cortico-striatal Function Of 2 Doses Of Pf-02545920 In Subjects With Early Huntington's Disease

This study will evaluate the Safety, Tolerability and Brain Function of 2 doses of PF-0254920 in Subjects with Early Huntington's Disease.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

37

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Paris Cedex 13, France, 75651
        • Centre d'Investigation Clinique (CIC)/ Institut du Cerveau et de la Möelle Epinière (ICM)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Must have a diagnosis of Huntington's Disease
  • a CAG repeat expansion equal or great than 39
  • a Unified Huntington Disease Rating Scale (UHDRS) Total Motor Score equal or greater than 5 and less than 60
  • a UHDRS Total Functional Capacity equal or greater than 9

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with evidence or history of severe acute or chronic medical condition or laboratory abnormality, or significant neurological disorder other than HD.
  • Treatment with any antipsychotic medication within 5 weeks of enrollment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 20 mg Arm Cohort A
  • Dose will be titrated up every 2 days by 5mg increments: 5mg Days 1-2, 10mg days 3-4, 15mg days 5-6, and reach 20 mg from Days 7 to Day28.
  • Orally, approx. Q12H (range 10-14 hours), administered at least one hour prior to, or two hours after meals.
  • Treatment for 28 days.
  • 5mg dose
  • Orally, approx. Q12H (range 10-14 hours), administered at least one hour prior to, or two hours after meals.
  • Dosing for 28 days.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo Arm Cohort A

- Orally, approx. Q12H (range 10-14 hours), administered at least one hour prior to, or two hours after meals.

Dosing for 28 days.

  • Orally, approx. Q12H (range 10-14 hours), administered at least one hour prior to, or two hours after meals.
  • Dosing for 28 days.
Experimental: 5 mg Arm Cohort B
  • Dose will be titrated up every 2 days by 5mg increments: 5mg Days 1-2, 10mg days 3-4, 15mg days 5-6, and reach 20 mg from Days 7 to Day28.
  • Orally, approx. Q12H (range 10-14 hours), administered at least one hour prior to, or two hours after meals.
  • Treatment for 28 days.
  • 5mg dose
  • Orally, approx. Q12H (range 10-14 hours), administered at least one hour prior to, or two hours after meals.
  • Dosing for 28 days.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo Arm Cohort B

- Orally, approx. Q12H (range 10-14 hours), administered at least one hour prior to, or two hours after meals.

Dosing for 28 days.

  • Orally, approx. Q12H (range 10-14 hours), administered at least one hour prior to, or two hours after meals.
  • Dosing for 28 days.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time Frame: Baseline up to Day 38
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence without regard to causality in a participant who received study drug. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of treatment and up to the follow-up period that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. AEs included both SAEs and non-serious AEs.
Baseline up to Day 38
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities Meeting the Criteria for Potential Clinical Concern (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality)
Time Frame: Baseline up to Day 38
The following laboratory parameters were analyzed: hematology (hemoglobin, hematocrit, red blood cell [RBC] count, platelet count, white blood cell [WBC] count, total neutrophils, eosinophils, monocytes, basophils, lymphocytes); blood chemistry (blood urea nitrogen [BUN], creatinine, glucose, calcium, sodium, potassium, chloride, total bicarbonate, aspartate aminotransferase [AST], alanine aminotransferase [ALT], total and direct bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, uric acid, albumin, and total protein; urinalysis (pH, glucose, protein/albumin, hemoglobin/blood, ketones/acetone, nitrites, leukocyte esterase, microscopy [if urine dipstick was positive for blood, protein, nitrites or leukocyte esterase]); others (urine/serum pregnancy test, glycosylated hemoglobin [HbA1c, if diabetic]).
Baseline up to Day 38
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Signs Findings
Time Frame: Baseline up to Day 38
Vital signs assessment included pulse rate and blood pressure. Criteria for vital sign values meeting potential clinical concern included: supine/sitting pulse rate less than (<)40 or greater than (>)120 beats per minute (bpm), standing pulse rate <40 or >140 bpm; systolic blood pressure (SBP) of greater than or equal to (>=)30 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) change from baseline or SBP <90 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure (DBP) >=20 mmHg change from baseline or DBP <50 mmHg.
Baseline up to Day 38
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings
Time Frame: Baseline up to Day 38
ECG parameters included PR interval, QRS complex, and corrected QT interval using Fridericia's formula (QTcF). Criteria for ECG changes meeting potential clinical concern included: PR interval ≥200 milliseconds (msec) or ≥25% increase when baseline is >100 msec; QRS interval ≥50% increase from baseline when baseline is less than or equal to (<=)200 msec; and QTcF ≥450 msec or ≥30 msec increase from baseline.
Baseline up to Day 38
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Body Weight of >=7%
Time Frame: Baseline up to Day 38
Weight assessment was performed by a study physician or a trained study nurse and was included in the physical examination.
Baseline up to Day 38
Categorical Summary of Participants Meeting Stopping Criteria
Time Frame: Baseline up to Day 38
Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) and WBC were monitored for safety. Participants with WBC <3000 but >=2000 cells/mm^3 or ANC <1500 but >=1000 cells/mm^3 were to have study treatment suspended. Participants with WBC <2000 or ANC <1000 cells/mm^3 were to be discontinued from study participation.
Baseline up to Day 38
Change From Baseline in Unified Huntington Disease Rating Scale (UHDRS) Total Motor Score at Day 28
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 28
The UHDRS is a clinical rating scale to provide a uniform assessment of the clinical features and course of Huntington Disease. The Total Motor Score (TMS) is 1 of the 6 components of UHDRS, includes 31 items, and ranges from a scale of 0 to 124 (higher scores indicate more severe disease).
Baseline, Day 28
Number of Participants With Suicidal Tendencies (C-SSRS Mapped to C-CASA) at Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1)
C-SSRS is a participant rated questionnaire to assess suicidal ideation, suicidal behavior, actual attempts (yes or no responses), and intensity of ideation (rated 1=low severity to 5=high severity). Yes/No responses are mapped to Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) categories: completed suicide, suicide attempt, preparatory acts towards imminent suicidal behavior, suicidal ideation, and self-injurious behavior, or no suicidal intent. A participant could have a yes or no response in more than 1 category.
Baseline (Day 1)
Number of Participants With Suicidal Tendencies (C-SSRS Mapped to C-CASA) at Day 7
Time Frame: Day 7
C-SSRS is a participant rated questionnaire to assess suicidal ideation, suicidal behavior, actual attempts (yes or no responses), and intensity of ideation (rated 1=low severity to 5=high severity). Yes/No responses are mapped to Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) categories: completed suicide, suicide attempt, preparatory acts toward imminent suicidal behavior, suicidal ideation, and self-injurious behavior, or no suicidal intent. A participant could have a yes or no response in more than 1 category.
Day 7
Number of Participants With Suicidal Tendencies (C-SSRS Mapped to C-CASA) at Day 28
Time Frame: Day 28
C-SSRS is a participant rated questionnaire to assess suicidal ideation, suicidal behavior, actual attempts (yes or no responses), and intensity of ideation (rated 1=low severity to 5=high severity). Yes/No responses are mapped to Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) categories: completed suicide, suicide attempt, preparatory acts toward imminent suicidal behavior, suicidal ideation, and self-injurious behavior, or no suicidal intent. A participant could have a yes or no response in more than 1 category.
Day 28

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) in Monetary Incentive Delay (MID) Task at Day 28
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1), Day 28
The monetary incentive delay (MID) task is established as a reliable method to elicit ventral striatal (VS) activity in relation to reward/punishment anticipation and tracked with dysfunctionalities across a range of conditions in which incentive motivation is thought to be abnormal (schizophrenia, depression, substance abuse, and pathological gambling). Pharmacological intervention has demonstrated reversal of observed deficit. The beta contrast value of 'REW' is for analysis of reward-related activity in VS within the task-related 'reward network' during the gain condition (relative to neutral) of the MID task. The changes in beta contrasts (fMRI) provided are changes in parameter estimates and do not have a unit of measure.
Baseline (Day 1), Day 28
Change From Baseline in Grip Strength Incentive Motivation Task at Day 28: Percent of Maximum Voluntary Contraction (MVC)
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 28
This incentive force task was developed to independently dissociate the degree to which a participant responds to reward motivation versus emotional motivation. The task itself included 12 repetitions of 9 trial types, for a total of 108 trials, grouped in a single session lasting about 20 minutes. The trial types were generated according to a combination of 3 emotional categories (negative, neutral, and positive pictures presented) and to 3 monetary incentives (0.01, 0.1, and 1€). Emotional categories and monetary incentives were randomly distributed over the trials and the sequence was fixed such that all subjects were assessed on the exact same task. For each trial, the subject was first presented with an emotional picture displayed on screen for 3000 milliseconds (ms).
Baseline, Day 28

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 6, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 6, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

March 7, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 14, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 8, 2017

Last Verified

May 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Huntington's Disease

Clinical Trials on PF-02545920

3
Subscribe