Impact of Bloodletting on Iron Metabolism in Type 1 Hemochromatosis (SAIFER)

June 8, 2021 updated by: Rennes University Hospital

Impact of Bloodletting on Iron Metabolism in Type 1 Hemochromatosis: Pathophysiological and Clinical Implications. Pilot Study.

Hemochromatosis type 1 is one of the most frequent genetic disease since the genetic predisposition (homozygosity for the C282Y mutation of the HFE gene) is encountered in about 3/1000 white subjects (5/1000 in Brittany, France).

For the half of these predisposed subjects, the phenotypic expression of the disease needs a treatment. This treatment is based upon repeated bloodletting which is generally considered as simple, safe and effective.

Nevertheless, it is still questioned as regard its physiopathological justification and its clinical implications. Indeed, bloodletting could cause an increase of non-transferrin bound iron (NTBI) particularly for its reactive form called labile plasma iron (LPI) This adverse physiopathological effect could have clinical consequences and could be linked with articular consequences which can be aggravated by the treatment.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Hemochromatosis type 1 is one of the most frequent genetic disease since the genetic predisposition (homozygosity for the C282Y mutation of the HFE gene) is encountered in about 3/1000 white subjects (5/1000 in Brittany, France).

For the half of these predisposed subjects, the phenotypic expression of the disease needs a treatment. This treatment is based upon repeated bloodletting which is generally considered as simple, safe and effective.

Nevertheless, it is still questioned as regard its physiopathological justification and its clinical implications. Indeed, bloodletting could cause an increase of non-transferrin bound iron (NTBI) particularly for its reactive form called labile plasma iron (LPI) This adverse physiopathological effect could have clinical consequences and could be linked with articular consequences which can be aggravated by the treatment.

The primary objective is to explore the effect of bloodletting upon plasmatic concentrations of NTBI.

The secondary objectives are to:

  • explore the impact of bloodletting upon different parameters of iron metabolism and in particular LPI, hepcidinemia and markers of erythropoiesis ;
  • explore basal and nycthemeral characteristics of new parameters of iron metabolism (hepcidin, NTBI, LPI) in hemochromatosis patients.

The demonstration of an adverse effect of bloodletting upon iron metabolism would allow for a therapeutic innovation based upon an association of bloodletting and oral chelation during the induction treatment of type 1 hemochromatosis and, more generally in hepcidino deficient forms of hemochromatosis.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

6

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Rennes, France, 35000
        • CHU Pontchaillou

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Men
  • Age 18 years or older
  • Homozygosity for the C282Y mutation of the HFE gene
  • With an indication of treatment by bloodletting (in accordance with the French HAS guidelines)
  • Ferritinemia ≥ 500µg/L
  • Transferrin saturation ≥ 75%
  • Never treated by bloodletting
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindication to bloodletting
  • Chronic inflammatory or dysmetabolic or neoplastic disease
  • Major cardiovascular disease
  • Excessive consumption of alcohol (≥ 3gr/day)
  • Treatment by iron chelators, C or E vitamins
  • Stay in altitude> 1500m in the month preceding the period Day 1
  • Patients under guardianship
  • Blood donation in the 3 past months
  • Night / shift workers

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Cohort

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Maximal variation (delta maximum) of NTBI during the 5 days following a bloodletting
Time Frame: Day 5
Day 5

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Kinetic of NTBI plasmatic concentration during the 5 days following a bloodletting
Time Frame: Day 5
Day 5
Maximal variation (delta maximum) of LPI during the 5 days following a bloodletting
Time Frame: Day 5
Day 5
Maximal variation (delta maximum) of hepcidin during the 5 days following a bloodletting
Time Frame: Day 5
Day 5
Kinetic of LPI plasmatic concentration during the 5 days following a bloodletting
Time Frame: Day 5
Day 5
Kinetic of hepcidin plasmatic concentration during the 5 days following a bloodletting
Time Frame: Day 5
Day 5
CRP
Time Frame: Day 9, day 10, day 11 and day 12
Day 9, day 10, day 11 and day 12
Hemoglobin
Time Frame: Day 9, day 10, day 11 and day 12
Day 9, day 10, day 11 and day 12
Soluble transferrin receptor
Time Frame: Day 9, day 10, day 11 and day 12
Day 9, day 10, day 11 and day 12
EPO
Time Frame: Day 9, day 10, day 11 and day 12
Day 9, day 10, day 11 and day 12
Circadian kinetic of NTBI plasmatic concentration when no bloodletting is performed
Time Frame: Day 1
Day 1
Circadian kinetic of API plasmatic concentration when no bloodletting is performed
Time Frame: Day 1
Day 1
Circadian kinetic of hepcidine plasmatic concentration when no bloodletting is performed
Time Frame: Day 1
Day 1
Maximal variation (delta maximum) of transferrin saturation during the 5 days following a bloodletting
Time Frame: Day 5
Day 5
Kinetic of transferrin saturation during the 5 days following a bloodletting
Time Frame: Day 5
Day 5

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Martine Ropert-Bouchet, MD, Rennes University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

June 3, 2013

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

April 19, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

April 19, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 12, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 12, 2013

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

March 14, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

June 11, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 8, 2021

Last Verified

June 1, 2021

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hemochromatosis Type 1

Clinical Trials on First evaluation phase : no intervention / Second evaluation phase: bloodletting of 7 ml/kg (with a maximum of 500ml)

3
Subscribe