A Comparison of Dorsal Branch of the Digital Nerve Versus Dorsal Digital Nerve for Finger Pulp Reconstruction

April 5, 2013 updated by: The Second Hospital of Tangshan
As the donor nerve attached with the flap, the dorsal branch of the digital nerve and the dorsal digital nerve is commonly used for finger pulp reconstruction.This study compares two donor nerves: the dorsal branch of the digital nerve and the dorsal digital nerve.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

The investigators compares two donor nerves attached with the flap for sensory reconstruction of finger pulp: the dorsal branch of the digital nerve and the dorsal digital nerve. The main outcomes were static 2-point discrimination and Semmes-Weinstein monofilament scores of the flap, and pain and cold intorlence of the reconstructed finger.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

71

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Hebei
      • Tangshan, Hebei, China, 063000
        • The Second Hospital of Tangshan

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

15 years to 55 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The pulp or fingertip defect in only one finger
  • A defect greater than or equal to 1.5 cm in length
  • Necessity to preserve finger length
  • A patient between 18 and 60 years of age

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Injuries to the dorsum of the middle phalanx
  • Injuries to the course of the vascular pedicle or donor nerve
  • A defect less than 1.5 cm in length
  • Multiple finger pulp defect
  • Extremely contaminated wounds

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Innervated finger flap
donor nerve attached with the flap for finger pulp reconstruction
the donor nerve is attached with the flap for sensory reconstruction of the finger

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
static 2-point discrimination (2PD) test
Time Frame: 18 months to 26 months
The test points are at the center of the radial or ulnar portion of the pulp. Each area is tested 3 times with a Discriminator. We stop at 4mm as a limit of 2PD and consider this normal.
18 months to 26 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cold intolerance
Time Frame: 18 months to 26 months
Cold intolerance in the reconstructed finger is assessed using the self-administered Cold Intolerance Severity Score questionnaire [10]. The maximum score is 100 and was group into 4 ranges (0-25, 26-50, 51-75, and 76-100), corresponding to mild, moderate, severe, and extreme severity, respectively.
18 months to 26 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain
Time Frame: 18 months to 26 months
Using the visual analogue scale (VAS), patients are asked to report pain sensations of the reconstructed pulps and donor sites. The VAS consists of a 10 cm line that is grouped into mild (0-3 cm), moderate (4-6 cm) and severe (7-10 cm).
18 months to 26 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Dequn Liu, MD. PhD, The Second Hospital of Tangshan

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 1, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 5, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

April 8, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 8, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 5, 2013

Last Verified

April 1, 2011

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • TSChen8652
  • HBTS13-03095 (Other Identifier: Ethics Committee of Hebei)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Soft Tissue Defect of the Finger

Clinical Trials on flap includes a donor nerve

Subscribe