Milnacipran and Neurocognition, Pain and Fatigue in Fibromyalgia : A 13-week Randomized, Placebo Controlled Cross Over Trial

October 24, 2023 updated by: Duke University

Milnacipran and Neurocognition, Pain and Fatigue in Fibromyalgia: A 13-week Randomized, Placebo Controlled Cross Over Trial

This study was designed to investigate whether milnacipran is safe and effective in improving cognitive function in fibromyalgia. In addition, this study was aimed to investigate whether improvement in neurocognitive status due to milnacipran correlates with improvements in pain, to investigate whether improvement in neurocognitive status due to milnacipran correlates with improvements in fatigue, and to determine whether treatment with improvement in neurocognitive status, pain and fatigue correlates with functional improvement.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Cognitive dysfunction is observed in fibromyalgia, especially for episodic memory, learning, and working memory.There is evidence for dysregulation of the attention system from low-level sensory processes up to emotional processes, and increased sensitivity to distraction.Milnacipran's balance of norepinephrine (NE) to serotonin (5-HT) of 3:1, similar to amitriptyline, a tricyclic that has demonstrated efficacy in fibromyalgia, as compared to venlafaxine which is 1:30, or duloxetine which is 1:10.7 In addition, because of milnacipran's effect on 5-HT, it should also be effective in treating other symptoms such as sleep disturbances and mood changes, which are associated to fibromyalgia, as well as other functional somatic syndromes. It is worth noting that several medications to treat fibromyalgia are sedating (e.g pregabalin, opioids, muscle relaxants) and impair neurocognition.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

26

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27705
        • Duke University Medical Center / Civitan Building

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 to 65 years.
  • Specific diagnosis of FM by the participant's rheumatologist or physician, including written confirmation, from a physician, of the FM diagnosis.
  • Confirmation of the FM diagnosis by American College of Rheumatology Criteria and a physical tender point examination.
  • Ability to give informed consent.
  • If female, nonpregnant/nonlactating.
  • If a sexually active female of reproductive potential, must be using adequate contraception (i.e., oral contraceptives, barrier protection, or prior tubal ligation) during the trial.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Bipolar disorders, any psychotic disorder.
  • the existence of concomitant rheumatological disorders, including rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, Hashimoto's disease, Sjogren's syndrome or scleroderma.
  • Substance dependence (except nicotine dependence) in the previous 3 months.
  • Currently suicidal or high suicide risk.
  • Serious or unstable medical disorders.
  • Any psychotropic drug treatment in the previous 2 weeks before screening.
  • A positive urine pregnancy test.
  • Screening laboratory values three times the limits of normal or judged clinically significant by the investigator.
  • History of hypersensitivity to milnacipran.
  • Seizure disorder, traumatic brain injury, any CNS disorder that affects cognitive status.
  • Concomitant meds: A minimum of 30 days on stable dose of analgesics and a minimum of 4 week washout from antidepressants and fibromyalgia specific medication ( e.g. pregabalin, neurontin) and supplements ( St John's wort, SAM-E).
  • Narrow angle glaucoma.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Milnacipran
Eligible subjects will receive milnacipran (12.5 mg-200 mg/day) in the forces titration schedule in flexible doses to the maximum tolerated dose starting with 12.5 mg qd for 1 day, 12.5 mg bid for 2 days, 25 mg bid for 4 days, 50 mg bid for 7 days and 100 mg bid thereafter. Patients who cannot tolerate higher doses will have a step-wise reduction in doses (e.g. 200 mg/day dose will be reduced to 100 mg/day; 100 mg/day will be reduced to 50 mg/day). Drug will be discontinued at the end of the study.
Other Names:
  • Savella
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Eligible subjects will receive placebo (12.5 mg-200 mg/day) in the forces titration schedule in flexible doses to the maximum tolerated dose starting with 12.5 mg qd for 1 day, 12.5 mg bid for 2 days, 25 mg bid for 4 days, 50 mg bid for 7 days and 100 mg bid thereafter. Patients who cannot tolerate higher doses will have a step-wise reduction in doses (e.g. 200 mg/day dose will be reduced to 100 mg/day; 100 mg/day will be reduced to 50 mg/day). Drug will be discontinued at the end of the study.
Other Names:
  • Savella

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual Analogue Scale for Pain
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 1, 2,4, and 6 weeks
Visual Analogue Scale for Pain operationally is a 100 mm line anchored by word descriptors at each end. The patient marks a point on the line that reflects their current pain state. The distance in mm from the left anchor point is the score. Higher scores indicate more pain.
Baseline, Week 1, 2,4, and 6 weeks
Changes in The Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS)
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 1, 2,4, and 6 weeks

The Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) is composed of nine items with a seven-point response format. The minimum score = 9 and maximum score possible = 63. Higher scores = greater fatigue severity.

Sample questions include "I am easily fatigued" and "Exercise brings on my fatigue." In the initial validation study, internal consistency for the Fatigue Severity Scale was high for specific illness groups (MS and lupus) and healthy controls. The scale clearly distinguished patients from controls and it was moderately correlated with a single-item visual analogue scale of fatigue intensity. In all patients, clinical improvement in fatigue was associated with reductions in scores on the Fatigue Severity Scale. The Fatigue Severity Scale is also a practical measure due to its brevity and ease of administration and scoring.

Baseline, Week 1, 2,4, and 6 weeks
Composite Brief Assessment of Cognition (BAC) Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 6
The composite BAC score is calculated by scoring each of the 6 individual tests (Verbal Memory Recall, Digit Sequencing, Token Motor Task, Verbal Fluency, Symbol Coding, and Tower of London), comparing each score to a healthy control sample to create z-scores, summing the z-scores, and rescaling the sum. The composite score range is -2127.8 to 1878.8, with higher scores indicating better cognition.
Baseline, Week 6

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery Composite Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 6

(MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery measures cognitive functioning within 7 domains: speed of processing, attention/vigilance, working memory (non verbal and verbal), verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving and social cognition.

The composite score is calculated by the MATRICS computer program, which equally weights each of the 7 domain scores. The range of composite scores is 20-80. Higher scores indicate higher levels or cognitive functioning, while lower scores indicate lower levels of cognitive functioning.

Baseline, Week 6

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ashwin A Patkar, MD, Duke University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 9, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 9, 2013

First Posted (Estimated)

April 11, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 26, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 24, 2023

Last Verified

August 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Fibromyalgia

Clinical Trials on Placebo

3
Subscribe