Sidus Stem-Free Shoulder IDE Study

July 11, 2019 updated by: Zimmer Biomet

Multicenter Trial of the Sidus Stem-Free Shoulder Arthroplasty System

The purpose of this study is to determine if Sidus stem-free shoulder system is safe and effective when used in total shoulder replacement.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The primary objectives of this study are to evaluate the safety and efficacy (defined as follows) of the Sidus Stem-Free Shoulder System in unilateral primary total shoulder arthroplasty.

Safety: Will be evaluated by monitoring the frequency and incidence of device related adverse events or unanticipated adverse device effects (UADEs) in investigational subjects as well as analyzing survivorship using revision or intended revision as an endpoint.

Efficacy: Will be determined by comparing the overall pain and functional performance, survivorship and radiographic success of investigational subjects with those subjects who received the control devices.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

95

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alberta
      • Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2N 1N4
        • University of Calgary Sports Medicine Clinic
    • Ontario
      • Kingston, Ontario, Canada, K7L 2V7
        • Kingston General Hospital
      • London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 4L6
        • St. Joseph's Health Care London - Hand and Upper Limb Centre
    • California
      • Redwood City, California, United States, 94063
        • Stanford University
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94158
        • University of California San Francisco - Orthopaedics Institute
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30342
        • St. Joseph's Hospital of Atlanta
    • Kentucky
      • Louisville, Kentucky, United States, 40241
        • Norton Orthopaedic & Sports Medicine
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21218
        • MedStar Health
    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
        • Washington University
    • Pennsylvania
      • Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States, 17033
        • Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19107
        • Rothman Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

22 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient must be 22 years of age or older.
  • Patient is skeletally mature.
  • Patient must have signed the IRB/EC approved informed consent.
  • Patient is a candidate for a total shoulder arthroplasty (replacement of humeral head and glenoid).
  • Patient has a diagnosis of primary osteoarthritis of the shoulder of grade III or higher.
  • Patient has experienced symptoms of shoulder pain and/or loss of function for at least 6 months and has a maximum ASES score of 40.
  • Patient has no findings to indicate an etiology of acute trauma, infection, avascular necrosis or inflammatory arthropathy of the operative shoulder.
  • Patient has undergone no previous reconstructive shoulder surgery. Acceptable previous shoulder surgeries include arthroscopy, soft tissue repair, or pinning/screw fixation due to a historic fracture.
  • Patient is willing and able to comply with the required post-operative therapy as defined in the protocol.
  • Patient is willing and able to comply with the required follow-up schedule as defined in the protocol.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient is a prisoner.
  • Patient is a known current alcohol or drug abuser.
  • Patient has a psychiatric illness or cognitive deficit that precluded informed consent.
  • Patient has a chronic renal impairment or failure.
  • Patient sensitivity to implant materials.
  • Patient has a vascular insufficiency due to large or small vessel disease which could inhibit postoperative healing.
  • Patient is currently receiving or has received within the last 3 months chronic systemic or inhaled steroids. This exclusion does not apply to those patients with occasional inhaler use due to seasonal allergies.
  • Local rash or skin infection around the intended operative site.
  • Patients with ongoing Worker's Compensation or third party liability claims related to the operative shoulder.
  • Pre-existing contra-lateral shoulder replacement less than 6 months ago.
  • Patient who will require a contra-lateral shoulder replacement less than 6 months from the current planned shoulder replacement.
  • Patient has evidence of major joint trauma, infection, avascular necrosis, cuff tear arthropathy, chronic dislocation, massive rotator cuff tear, inflammatory arthropathy, or previous shoulder surgery (other than arthroscopy, soft tissue repair, or pinning/screw fixation due to historic fracture).
  • Patient has significant muscle paralysis.
  • Patient has Charcot arthropathy.
  • Patient has metaphyseal bony defects at the bone/implant interface which could inhibit prosthesis fixation.
  • Patient has a preoperative computed tomography scans or other radiographic images of the shoulder that showed insufficient glenoid or humeral bone stock to allow for implantation of the prosthesis.
  • Insufficient bone stock exists in the presence of metabolic bone disease (i.e. osteoporosis or severe osteopenia), cancer and radiation.
  • Patient with severe glenoid deficiency.
  • Prior fracture of the operative shoulder with the presence of malunion or non-union.
  • Prior tuberosity fracture with the presence of malunion or non-union.
  • Patient has an active joint or systemic infection.
  • Patient has a life expectancy of less than two years.
  • Patient with unacceptably high operative risk.
  • Patient unwilling to sign protocol required informed consent.
  • Patient is unwilling to complete the protocol required radiographic imaging.
  • Patient is unwilling to complete the protocol required follow-up of two years.
  • Patient is known to be pregnant.
  • Intraoperative findings which indicate insufficient bone stock or local deformities which could inhibit prosthesis fixation. Final assessment of bone quality will be completed intraoperatively upon resection of the humeral head and prior to insertion of the anchor as described in the surgical technique. If there is any doubt regarding bone quality affecting the stable fixation of the anchor, the surgeon must use a stemmed prosthesis.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Investigational
This arm will include all subjects who are implanted with the investigational Sidus Stem-Free Total Shoulder Arthroplasty System.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain and Function as Measured by the American Society of Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Questionnaire
Time Frame: Two years
Pain and function as measured by the American Society of Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons questionnaire. ASES consists of 3 subcomponent scores including pain, instability and activities of daily living. The pain score can be 0 to 10 with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain imaginable. The instability score can be 0 to 10 with 0 being no instability and 10 being the worst instability imaginable. The activities of daily living consists of 10 questions with ordinal responses of 0, 1, 2, and 3. 3 involves no limitation and 0 is unable to do. The 3 subcomponents combine to make the overall ASES score which can range from 0 to 100 with 0 being the worst possible score and 100 being the best.
Two years
Absence of Radiographic Evidence of Failure or Pending Failure Based on Radiographic Assessment
Time Frame: Two years

absence of radiographic evidence of pending failure of the humeral components, assessed at 2 years which may include the following:

  • implant fracture
  • progressive implant migration or subsidence ≥ 5 mm
Two years
The Number of Device Related Serious Adverse Events.
Time Frame: Two years
This outcome will measure the frequency of device related serious adverse events.
Two years
Survivorship
Time Frame: Up to Two years
The Kaplan-Meier method was used for this study. This outcome measures survivorship of the implanted devices from the date of implantation to the date of revision or intended revision up to 2 years post-operative (whichever came first).
Up to Two years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ASES Functional and Pain Scores at Intervals Other Than 2 Years as Measured by the American Society of Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Questionnaire
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year
Pain and function as measured by the American Society of Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons questionnaire. ASES consists of 3 subcomponent scores including pain, instability and activities of daily living. The pain score can be 0 to 10 with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain imaginable. The instability score can be 0 to 10 with 0 being no instability and 10 being the worst instability imaginable. The activities of daily living consists of 10 questions with ordinal responses of 0, 1, 2, and 3. 3 involves no limitation and 0 is unable to do. The 3 subcomponents combine to make the overall ASES score which can range from 0 to 100 with 0 being the worst possible score and 100 being the best.
6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year
SF-12 Mental Health and Physical Composite Scores as Measured by the SF-12 Scoring Questionnaire.
Time Frame: Pre-Op, 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years
SF-12 Mental Health and Physical Composite Scores. SF-12 is a validated health survey that uses 12 questions to measure functional health and well being from the patient's point of view. The SF-12 is calculated on a scale of 0 to 100, where a 0 is the worst level of health and 100 is the best level of health. The scores are then normalized with a mean score of 50 and a standard deviation of 10, so that scores greater than 50 represent a health level better than average, and scores less than 50 represent a level lower than average.
Pre-Op, 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2013

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

May 1, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 23, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 11, 2013

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

June 14, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

July 15, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 11, 2019

Last Verified

July 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CIU2012-12E
  • G130026 (OTHER: FDA)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteoarthritis

Clinical Trials on Sidus Stem-Free Total Shoulder Arthroplasty System

3
Subscribe