Effects of tDCS Combined With mCIMT or Mental Practice in Poststroke Patients

April 10, 2015 updated by: Kátia Monte-Silva, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco

Impact of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)on the Effects of Mental Practice and Modified Constraint-induced Movement Therapy (mCIMT)in the Rehabilitation of Chronic Stroke Patients

This study aims to evaluate systematically and controlled the effectiveness of mental practice techniques and modified constraint- induced movement therapy (mCIMT)in the treatment of post-stroke patients with motor deficit in the upper limb. As well as finding a protocol of transcranial direct current stimulation(tDCS)that will maximize the effects of the practice of mental image and mCIMT. To this end, the subjects included will be submitted to 12 therapy sessions with active or sham tDCS combined with at least one of the following techniques: conventional physiotherapy, mental practice technique or mCIMT

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Eighty-four patients chronic post-stroke will be recruited to participate in the study. After screening to check the eligibility criteria and giving informed consent, the patients will be randomized into seven distinct groups (12 per group). All the patients will be submitted to 12 therapeutic sessions that will occur with a frequency of three times a week.

Before, immediately after and 1 month after the beginning of the experimental sessions patients will be submitted to an evaluation at each moment will be applied: (i) Fugl- Meyer Scale, (ii) Motor Activity Log Scale, (iii ) Jebsen-Taylor hand functional test, (iv) Independence Functional Measure (v) Box-Block Test, (vi) Dynamometry and (vii) Berg Balance Scale.

In experimental sessions, the subjects always receive physiotherapy treatment with conventional techniques, the protocol will follow the guidelines outlined in Clinical Practice Guideline for physical therapy in stroke patients with the Royal Dutch Society for Physical Therapy (2004). Besides physical therapy, the patient may be subjected to transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) associated with the techniques of modified constraint-induced movement therapy (mCIMT) or mental practice (MP).

tDCS protocol During tDCS sessions, the patients will be seated in a comfortable chair with head and arm rests. Continuous direct current will be applied by clinical microcurrent stimulator (Soterix, USA) using a pair of saline-soaked surface sponge electrodes (surface 35 cm2). For anodal and sham stimulation (the polarity refers always to the motor cortical electrode), the anode electrode will be placed over primary motor cortex (M1; EEG 10/20 system) of the affected hemisphere and cathode above contralateral orbit. For cathodal tDCS, the cathode will be positioned over M1 of the non-affected hemisphere and the anode was placed above the contralateral orbit. For bi-hemispheric tDCS the anode electrode will be placed over M1 of the affected hemisphere and the cathode over the M1 of the healthy hemisphere. Transcranial direct current stimulation will be administered with a current strength of 1 mA for 13 (anodal/bi-hemispheric tDCS) or 9 min (cathodal tDCS). Sham tDCS will be performed by current flow for 30 s, a method shown to achieve a good level of blinding mCIMT protocol The modified CIMT consisted of (i) complete immobilization of the non-paretic upper limb and (ii) intensive training the paretic upper limb and will be administered by a trained therapist, who was not involved in the pre-post evaluations.

Continuously for six hours daily over a period of four weeks, including weekend, all patients will be remained with complete immobilization of the non paretic upper limb. For this, an arm sling with the shoulder in adduction and internal rotation, elbow flexed at 90º, wrist and fingers in neutral position, made specifically for each patient will be used. They will be advised to use the restriction during their daily activities and instructed to remove it every hour for 10 minutes to perform stretching, which has been previously taught by the researchers to avoid functional deterioration caused by disuse. All muscle groups of the upper extremity will be stretched. A guide with instructions of the stretching will be distributed to patients. The patients will be instructed to take the immobilization on every day at same hour the tDCS sessions. In addition, the patients will be allowed to take the arm sling off during activities in which safety would be compromised, such as toileting, dressing, and bathing.

For intensive training the paretic upper limb, the patients will attend a gross motor and fine motor activities program performed for 1 hour per day, three times per week. Each task was performed for 2-3 minutes and the rest interval between tasks will be determined for each subject in order to avoid fatigue and excessive tiredness. The tasks will be progressively adapted by increasing speed or accuracy to allow improvement of patient performance. All tasks will be done with subjects sitting on a chair with standard dimensions and performed on support table. During training sessions, the patients will remain with the non-paretic arm immobilized.

Mental practice protocol Prior to experimental sessions, the mental capacity of subjects to learn the imagery techniques will be tested by the Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire and a chronometric test. The Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire is an imagery assessment tool comprised of 10 items, each scored on a five-point ordinal scale, including the image clarity (visual dimension) and the sensations intensity (kinesthetic dimension) of body movements. Each item describes an action: (i) neck flexion/extension, (ii) shoulder shrugging, (iii) forward trunk flexion, (iv) forward shoulder flexion, (v) elbow flexion, (vi) thumb to finger tips, (vii) knee extension, (viii) hip abduction, (ix) foot external rotation, and (x) foot tapping. Subjects physically execute each movement and immediately afterwards imagine performing the same movement. A score of 5 corresponds to the highest clarity/intensity, and a score of 1 corresponds to the lowest clarity/ intensity (for a review, see Malouin et al., 2007). The Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire scores allowed the researcher to assess each participant's abilities and decide whether the subject was a suitable candidate for MP. Comparing actual and imagined movement times, the chronometric test determined the motor imagery ability of participants.

The mental practice will consist of motor imagination of tasks. These tasks will consist of action for the patient to imagine themselves, with the greatest wealth of detail possible, performing motor activities with the hemiparetic upper limb, such as the movement of the touching thumb on each other's toes hand, or even the movement of bringing a cup towards his mouth. The technique of mental practice will be applied at the same time of the tDCS.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

84

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Pernambuco
      • Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil, 50740-560
        • Applied Neuroscience Laboratory

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • chronic stroke (> 6 months)
  • score ≥ 20 at the Folstein Mini Mental State Examination
  • score ≤ 3 at the Ashworth Scale
  • score ≤ 4 at the Visual Analog Pain Scale

Exclusion Criteria:

  • multiple brain lesions
  • medication for treatment of spasticity
  • attention deficit
  • deficit in perceptual ability and motivation to follow the instructions for the mental training
  • pregnant
  • pacemaker
  • metal implant in the region of the skull and face
  • history of convulsion
  • epilepsy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: physiotherapy + anodal tDCS + mCIMT
Before a anodal tDCS with duration of 13 minutes and intensity of 1mA applied at the injured motor cortex, the patient will be submitted to a 30 minutes physiotherapy protocol. Lastly the individual will realized a 45 minutes mCIMT protocol. The experimental sessions will be repeated three times per week, will be realized 10 sessions. At home the patient will spend 6 hours per day with the restraint for the paretic upper limb.
tDCS involves application of very low-amplitude direct currents(2 mA or less) via surface scalp electrodes.This produces a sub-sensory level of electrical stimulation which remains imperceptible by most people during its application. In a small percentage of patients it may cause minimal discomfort with a mild tingling sensation, which usually disappears after a few seconds. The applied current modifies the transmembrane neuronal potential and thus influences the level of excitability. Depending on the polarity of active electrodes tDCS can increase or decrease corticomotor excitability. Cathodal tDCS decrease and anodal tDCS increase the motor cortex excitability.
Other Names:
  • non invasive brain stimulation
Experimental: Physiotherapy + cathodal tDCS + mCIMT
Before a cathodal tDCS with duration of 9 minutes and intensity of 1mA applied at the healthy motor cortex, the patient will be submitted to a 30 minutes physiotherapy protocol. Lastly the individual will realized a 45 minutes mCIMT protocol. The experimental sessions will be repeated three times per week, will be realized 10 sessions. At home the patient will spend 6 hours per day with the restraint for the paretic upper limb.
tDCS involves application of very low-amplitude direct currents(2 mA or less) via surface scalp electrodes.This produces a sub-sensory level of electrical stimulation which remains imperceptible by most people during its application. In a small percentage of patients it may cause minimal discomfort with a mild tingling sensation, which usually disappears after a few seconds. The applied current modifies the transmembrane neuronal potential and thus influences the level of excitability. Depending on the polarity of active electrodes tDCS can increase or decrease corticomotor excitability. Cathodal tDCS decrease and anodal tDCS increase the motor cortex excitability.
Other Names:
  • non invasive brain stimulation
Experimental: Physiotherapy+bi-hemispheric tDCS+mCIMT
Before a bi-hemispheric tDCS with duration of 13 minutes and intensity of 1mA applied at the healthy (cathode) and injured (anode) motor cortex, the patient will be submitted to a 30 minutes physiotherapy protocol. Lastly the individual will realized a 45 minutes mCIMT protocol. The experimental sessions will be repeated three times per week, will be realized 10 sessions. At home the patient will spend 6 hours per day with the restraint for the paretic upper limb.
tDCS involves application of very low-amplitude direct currents(2 mA or less) via surface scalp electrodes.This produces a sub-sensory level of electrical stimulation which remains imperceptible by most people during its application. In a small percentage of patients it may cause minimal discomfort with a mild tingling sensation, which usually disappears after a few seconds. The applied current modifies the transmembrane neuronal potential and thus influences the level of excitability. Depending on the polarity of active electrodes tDCS can increase or decrease corticomotor excitability. Cathodal tDCS decrease and anodal tDCS increase the motor cortex excitability.
Other Names:
  • non invasive brain stimulation
Sham Comparator: Physiotherapy+sham tDCS+mCIMT
Before a sham tDCS with duration of 30 seconds and intensity of 1mA applied at the injured motor cortex, the patient will be submitted to a 30 minutes physiotherapy protocol. Lastly the individual will realized a 45 minutes mCIMT protocol. The experimental sessions will be repeated three times per week, will be realized 10 sessions. At home the patient will spend 6 hours per day with the restraint for the paretic upper limb.
tDCS involves application of very low-amplitude direct currents(2 mA or less) via surface scalp electrodes.This produces a sub-sensory level of electrical stimulation which remains imperceptible by most people during its application. In a small percentage of patients it may cause minimal discomfort with a mild tingling sensation, which usually disappears after a few seconds. The applied current modifies the transmembrane neuronal potential and thus influences the level of excitability. Depending on the polarity of active electrodes tDCS can increase or decrease corticomotor excitability. Cathodal tDCS decrease and anodal tDCS increase the motor cortex excitability.
Other Names:
  • non invasive brain stimulation
Experimental: Physiotherapy+tDCS+mental practice
Before a tDCS protocol applied during de mental practice training , the patient will be submitted to a 30 minutes physiotherapy protocol. The experimental sessions will be repeated three times per week, will be realized 10 sessions.
tDCS involves application of very low-amplitude direct currents(2 mA or less) via surface scalp electrodes.This produces a sub-sensory level of electrical stimulation which remains imperceptible by most people during its application. In a small percentage of patients it may cause minimal discomfort with a mild tingling sensation, which usually disappears after a few seconds. The applied current modifies the transmembrane neuronal potential and thus influences the level of excitability. Depending on the polarity of active electrodes tDCS can increase or decrease corticomotor excitability. Cathodal tDCS decrease and anodal tDCS increase the motor cortex excitability.
Other Names:
  • non invasive brain stimulation
Sham Comparator: Physiotherapy+sham tDCS+mental practice
Before a sham tDCS protocol applied during the mental practice training, the patient will be submitted to a 30 minutes physiotherapy protocol. The experimental sessions will be repeated three times per week, will be realized 10 sessions.
tDCS involves application of very low-amplitude direct currents(2 mA or less) via surface scalp electrodes.This produces a sub-sensory level of electrical stimulation which remains imperceptible by most people during its application. In a small percentage of patients it may cause minimal discomfort with a mild tingling sensation, which usually disappears after a few seconds. The applied current modifies the transmembrane neuronal potential and thus influences the level of excitability. Depending on the polarity of active electrodes tDCS can increase or decrease corticomotor excitability. Cathodal tDCS decrease and anodal tDCS increase the motor cortex excitability.
Other Names:
  • non invasive brain stimulation
No Intervention: Physiotherapy
The patient will be submitted to a 30 minutes physiotherapy protocol. The experimental sessions will be repeated three times per week, will be realized 10 sessions.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Upper Extremity Motor Function
Time Frame: At baseline, 1 month and 2 month
The Fugl-Meyer assessment was used to measure recovery of motor control. It is a 226-point scoring system that includes range of motion, pain, sensation, motor function of the upper and lower extremities, and balance.This instrument provides a reliable and valid measure of specific motor function that is also sensitive to change.
At baseline, 1 month and 2 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Motor Activity Log
Time Frame: At baseline, 1 month and 2 month
The MAL is a scripted, structured interview to measure real-world upper extremity function. It was developed to measure the effects of therapy on the more impaired arm following stroke. The original MAL consists of 14 activities of daily living (ADLs) such as using a towel, brushing teeth, and picking up a glass. For a specified time period post-stroke, the individual is asked about the extent of the activity performed and how well it was performed by the more impaired arm. The response scale ranges from 0 (never used) to 5 (same as pre-stroke). The mean of the scores for frequency of the activity comprises the Amount of Use (AOU) scale; the mean of the scores for how well the activity was performed comprises the Quality of Movement (QOM) scale. Ideally, ratings are obtained from the individual with a stroke as well as a knowledgeable informant (caregiver).
At baseline, 1 month and 2 month

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test
Time Frame: At baseline, 1 month and 2 months
The Jebsen-Taylor function test was designed to provide a short, objective test of hand functions commonly used in activities of daily living (ADLs). The target patient population includes adults with neurological or musculoskeletal conditions involving hand disabilities, although there may be other patient populations with other hand dysfunctions which may be appropriate. The test was developed to be used by health professionals working in restoration of hand function. It consists of seven items that include a range of fine motor, weighted and non-weighted hand function activities
At baseline, 1 month and 2 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Kátia K Monte Silva, PhD, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 10, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 13, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

June 18, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 13, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 10, 2015

Last Verified

May 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on tDCS

3
Subscribe