- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01883141
Left Ventricular MultiSpot Pacing for CRT (iSPOT) (iSPOT)
June 30, 2025 updated by: Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure
The purpose of the iSPOT Study is to evaluate the contractility using positive left ventricular (LV) dP/dt max across LV pacing site(s) in patients indicated for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
31
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Aalst, Belgium, 9300
- Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis Aalst
-
Gent, Belgium, B-9000
- Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
-
-
-
-
-
Ashkelon, Israel, 78278
- Barzilai Medical Center
-
-
-
-
-
Warsaw, Poland, 02-637
- Klinika Choroby Wieńcowej
-
Warsaw, Poland, 04-628
- Klinika Zaburzeń Rytmu Serca
-
Zabrze, Poland, 44-800
- Medical University of Silesia
-
-
-
-
-
London, United Kingdom, SE 1 7EH
- Guys and St. Thomas NHS Trust
-
London, United Kingdom, W2 I NY
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Subject is indicated for cardiac CRT or CRT-D device according to current applicable European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines
- Subject has a left bundle branch block (LBBB) conduction pattern
- Subject is in stable sinus rhythm at the time of implant (no atrial arrhythmias lasting > 30 seconds during the last 2 weeks prior to inclusion and no documented atrial fibrillation (AF) episodes allowed during the last 2 weeks prior to inclusion)
- Subject receives optimal heart failure oral medical therapy (ACE inhibitor and/or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) and Beta Blockers), and is on a stable medication scheme for at least 1 month prior to enrollment
- Subject (or the legal guardian) is willing to sign informed consent form
- Subject is 18 years or older or as specified minimal age per local law/regulation
Exclusion Criteria:
- Subject has permanent atrial fibrillation/ flutter or tachycardia
- Subject experienced recent myocardial infarction (MI), within 40 days prior to enrollment
- Subject underwent coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) or valve surgery, within 90 days prior to enrollment
- Subject is post heart transplantation, or is actively listed on the transplantation list
- Subject is implanted with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD)
- Subject is on chronic renal dialysis
- Subject has severe renal disease (defined as estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (equation provided by Modification of Diet in Renal Disease study): (eGFR) < 30 mL/min/1.73m2)
- Subject is on continuous or uninterrupted infusion (inotropic) therapy for heart failure (≥ 2 stable infusions per week)
- Subject has severe aortic stenosis (with a valve area of <1.0 cm2 or significant valve disease expected to be operated within study period)
- Subject has complex and uncorrected congenital heart disease
- Subject has a mechanical heart valve
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women, or women of child bearing potential and who are not on a reliable form of birth control
- Subject is enrolled in one or more concurrent studies that would confound the results of this study
- Subject is already implanted with a device
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Electrophysiological Study
Subjects will receive pacing from one right ventricular lead and one left ventricular catheter/lead with multiple LV pacing spots during electrophysiological study procedure
|
Subjects will receive pacing from one right ventricular lead and one left ventricular catheter/lead with multiple LV pacing spots
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage Change in Positive Left Ventricular (LV) dP/dt Max (mm HG/Sec) of Multispot LV Pacing Configuration Compared to Normal Biventricular Pacing
Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the time of the EP procedure, which has an average duration of 2 to 3 hours
|
Measure the percentage change in positive left ventricular (LV) dP/dt max (mm HG/sec) of multispot LV pacing configuration compared to normal biventricular pacing in patients undergoing a research study, an electrophysiological exploratory procedure or cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) implant.
The percentage changes correspond to a percentage change between a pacing configuration (pacing on, e.g., Multispot pacing) and baseline (LV pacing off).
There are several repetitions of pacing off and on for each pacing configuration.
For one repetition, the percentage change is determined as ([median dP/dt max during pacing On] - (median baseline dP/dt max during pacing Off])/[median dP/dt max during pacing Off].
From all percentage changes for a given pacing configuration and subject, a regression analysis is performed to determine the regression predicted highest percentage change.
The presented percentage change is the average over all subjects.
|
Participants will be followed for the time of the EP procedure, which has an average duration of 2 to 3 hours
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage Change in Positive Left Ventricular (LV) dP/dt Max (mm HG/Sec) of Multi-vein LV Pacing Configuration Compared to Normal Biventricular Pacing
Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the time of the EP procedure, which has an average duration of 2 to 3 hours
|
Measure the percentage change in positive left ventricular (LV) dP/dt max (mm HG/sec) of multi-vein LV pacing configuration compared to normal biventricular pacing in patients undergoing a research study, an electrophysiological exploratory procedure or CRT-implant.
The percentage changes correspond to a percentage change between a pacing configuration (pacing on, e.g., Multispot pacing) and baseline (LV pacing off).
There are several repetitions of pacing off and on for each pacing configuration.
For one repetition, the percentage change is determined as ([median dP/dt max during pacing On] - (median baseline dP/dt max during pacing Off])/[median dP/dt max during pacing Off].
From all percentage changes for a given pacing configuration and subject, a regression analysis is performed to determine the regression predicted highest percentage change.
The presented percentage change is the average over all subjects.
|
Participants will be followed for the time of the EP procedure, which has an average duration of 2 to 3 hours
|
|
Percentage Change in Positive Left Ventricular (LV) dP/dt Max (mm HG/Sec) of Multi-vein LV Pacing Configuration Compared to Multispot LV Pacing Configuration
Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the time of the EP procedure, which has an average duration of 2 to 3 hours
|
Measure the percentage change in positive left ventricular (LV) dP/dt max (mm HG/sec) of multi-vein LV pacing configuration compared to multispot LV pacing in patients undergoing a research study, an electrophysiological exploratory procedure or CRT-implant.
The percentage changes correspond to a percentage change between a pacing configuration (pacing on, e.g., Multispot pacing) and baseline (LV pacing off).
There are several repetitions of pacing off and on for each pacing configuration.
For one repetition, the percentage change is determined as ([median dP/dt max during pacing On] - (median baseline dP/dt max during pacing Off])/[median dP/dt max during pacing Off].
From all percentage changes for a given pacing configuration and subject, a regression analysis is performed to determine the regression predicted highest percentage change.
The presented percentage change is the average over all subjects.
|
Participants will be followed for the time of the EP procedure, which has an average duration of 2 to 3 hours
|
|
Correlation of Blood Pressure, Electrograms (EGMs) and Electrocardiographic Mapping Measurements With the Positive LV dP/dt Max Values
Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the time of the EP procedure, which has an average duration of 2 to 3 hours
|
Correlate blood pressure, EGMs and electrocardiographic mapping measurements with the percentage change LV dP/dt max values obtained during each of the three pacing configurations BiV (BiV distal, BiV mid, BiV proximal, BiV anterior, BiV posterior), MultiVein and MultiSpot.
Correlation will be summarized over all pacing configurations and time points since the interest is in the overall correlation between LV dP/dt max and other measurements, not in the correlation per pacing configuration or per time point.
A linear mixed effects models as described in Roy, Biometrical Journal 48 (2006) 2, 286- 301 was used for the diastolic and systolic blood pressures.
Due to the convergence problems for the linear mixed for Q-LV and QRS, the general linear model as described in Blank & Altman, Biometrical Journal 310 (1995), p 446, was used for Q-LV and QRS.
|
Participants will be followed for the time of the EP procedure, which has an average duration of 2 to 3 hours
|
|
Use of Non-invasive Measurements to Identify Pacing Configuration With Highest Positive LV dP/dt Max
Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the time of the EP procedure, which has an average duration of 2 to 3 hours
|
Evaluate whether the non-invasive measurements (Nexfin blood pressures) that are also collected during the study can identify the pacing configuration with the highest percentage change LV dP/dt max.
For each patient and all time points of data collection, a regression analysis was applied to determine the highest predicted percentage change LV dP/dtmax or percentage change Nexfin pressure per configuration.
The Kappa statistic was then determined based on a 7x7 contingency table where the rows and columns corresponded to the pacing configurations.
There is no interest in determining the agreement statistics Kappa per time point or per configuration since the interest of this analysis is in the overall agreement between LV dP/dt max and non-invasive measurements.
|
Participants will be followed for the time of the EP procedure, which has an average duration of 2 to 3 hours
|
|
Within Patient Variability in Positive LV dP/dt Max
Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the time of the EP procedure, which has an average duration of 2 to 3 hours
|
Evaluate the within patient variability in positive LV dP/dt max measurements.
The standard deviation of the percentage change LV dP/dt max between pacing configurations will be evaluated to obtain information for future sample size calculations for the primary outcome.The standard deviation is summarized over all available subjects and could be used as an estimate of within patient variability for future sample size calculations for the primary outcome.
|
Participants will be followed for the time of the EP procedure, which has an average duration of 2 to 3 hours
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Maciej Sterlinski, Dr., Warsaw Hospital
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
June 1, 2013
Primary Completion (Actual)
December 1, 2014
Study Completion (Actual)
April 1, 2015
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
May 24, 2013
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
June 19, 2013
First Posted (Estimated)
June 21, 2013
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
July 2, 2025
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
June 30, 2025
Last Verified
May 1, 2018
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- iSPOT
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Heart Failure
-
Indiana UniversityRecruitingCongestive Heart Failure | Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) | Congestive Heart Failure Chronic | Congestive Heart Failure(CHF)United States
-
University of Health Sciences LahoreRecruitingAcute Decompensated Heart Failure | Heart Failure, Diastolic | Heart Failure, SystolicPakistan
-
Tufts Medical CenterMetro West Medical CenterCompletedCongestive Heart Failure | Diastolic Heart Failure | Systolic Heart FailureUnited States
-
Abbott Medical DevicesCompletedHeart Failure | Heart Failure, Diastolic | Heart Failure, Systolic | Heart Failure NYHA Class II | Heart Failure NYHA Class III | Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction | Heart Failure NYHA Class IV | Heart Failure With Normal Ejection Fraction | Heart Failure; With Decompensation | Heart Failure...United States, Canada
-
Manipal UniversityUnknownHeart Failure | Decompensated Heart Failure | Acute Heart Failure | Diastolic Heart Failure | Systolic Heart FailureIndia
-
Lakeland Regional Health Systems, Inc.RecruitingHeart Failure | Heart Failure Acute | Acute Heart Failure (AHF) | Heart Failure - NYHA II - IVUnited States
-
VA Eastern Colorado Health Care SystemNational Institute on Aging (NIA)CompletedHeart Failure | Heart Failure, Diastolic | Heart Failure, Systolic | Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction | Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction | Heart Failure; With Decompensation | Heart Failure,Congestive | Heart Failure AcuteUnited States
-
Eli Lilly and CompanyNot yet recruitingHeart Failure | Heart Failure, Diastolic | Heart Failure, SystolicUnited States, Japan
-
Wake Forest UniversityCompletedHeart Failure, Congestive | Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
-
Wake Forest UniversityNational Institute on Aging (NIA)CompletedHeart Failure, Congestive | Diastolic Heart FailureUnited States
Clinical Trials on Electrophysiological Study
-
Assiut UniversityNot yet recruitingWolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome
-
Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart FailureCompletedHeart FailureSweden, Slovakia, Poland, Spain, United Kingdom
-
Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore...CompletedElectrophysiologic Study | Hand AnastomosisItaly
-
University of OklahomaCompletedTachycardia, Atrioventricular Nodal ReentryUnited States
-
University of Sao Paulo General HospitalAbbottNot yet recruitingSyncope, Vasovagal | Bradycardia; SyncopeBrazil
-
Samsung Medical CenterCompletedAtrial FibrillationKorea, Republic of
-
Assiut UniversityUnknownElectroPhys: Mononeuropathy
-
Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de BellvitgeHospital Universitario Ramon y Cajal; Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge; Hospital... and other collaboratorsRecruitingAortic Stenosis | Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation | Conduction DisturbancesSpain
-
Sykehuset TelemarkOslo University HospitalCompletedAtrial Fibrillation | Atrial Flutter | Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome | Pre-excitation Syndromes | Paroxysmal TachycardiaNorway
-
Hospital Universitario 12 de OctubreCompletedSupraventricular TachycardiaSpain