Assessment of Socioeconomic Status by Brazil and Quality of Life for Urinary Incontinence in Brazilian Women

August 30, 2013 updated by: University of Sao Paulo General Hospital

Socioeconomic Profile and QUALITY OF LIFE FOR WOMEN WITH AND WITHOUT PELVIC FLOOR DYSFUNCTION

Age, parity, obesity and a number of comorbidities are the major clinical and lifestyle risk factors for female urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse at the population level. The socioeconomic risks for incontinence have however, conflicting evidence with assorted measures of socioeconomic status. Brazil is a country with enormous social contrasts, and deep inequality. We have a mixed origin of cultures and different economic and regional conditions. We believe that the perception and the impact that has Pelvic floor dysfunction in the quality of life of the woman must vary widely according to socioeconomic status (including household income, highest educational level, family income). There is to date no studies have correlated a criterion for classifying economic official in Brazil with the impact of quality of life (based in KHQ or PQOL) of women with urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Detailed Description

The research is being conducted at the Department of Gynecology of a referral hospital in the state of Ceará, Brazil in the period October 2011 to February 2012. Women will be referred from Primary Care and Health scheduled for evaluation in the sector of Urogynecology Cesar Cals General Hospital, Department of Health of the State of Ceará. During the study period 200 patients will be treated with complaints of urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse in the sector. Included in the study women who were postmenopausal, who are not taking hormone therapy in the last six months. Women with urinary loss, which does not have non-inhibited contraction of the detrusor proven by urodynamic study. Will be compared with a group of women without pelvic floor dysfunction confirmed by clinical history and gynecological examination with the same characteristics in relation to postmenopausal status, all from the general gynecology outpatient clinic. Will be used for data collection socioeconomics an interview administrated questionnaire adapted from the Brazil Economic Classification Criterion - 2011 (CCEB) The CCEB is an instrument of economic segmentation that uses the survey of household characteristics (presence and quantity of some items of comfort and home schooling level of household head) to differentiate the population. The criterion assigns points according to each household characteristic and performs the sum of these points. Then will be made a match score of the test strips and layers of economic status defined by A1, A2, B1, B2, C1, C2, D, E. This criterion was designed to define broad classes that meet the needs of segmentation (by purchasing power) of most companies. To evaluate Quality of Life in Urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse women we used the KHQ questionnaire, QoL-P respectively. To evaluate the Overall Quality of Life, SF-36. For functional evaluation of the pelvic floor (AP) bidigital evaluation was performed using the classification of Ortiz (1996) and schema PERFECT Oxford (1990). Will be used the application EpiInfo version 6.04, Atlanta, USA. Will be studied the socioeconomic variables (age, educational level, economic status and income), health perception variables (the impact of incontinence / prolapse, the limitations of performance tasks, physical limitation, social limitation, personal relationships, the emotions, sleep and energy and gravity measurements). Will be used the prevalence of urinary incontinence as a measure of the occurrence and chi-square test and test of Pearson to evaluate the statistical significance considering p <0.05. Exploratory analysis will also performed to describe the frequency distribution of socioeconomic variables.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

200

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ce
      • Fortaleza, Ce, Brazil, 60125120
        • Cesar cals hospital
      • Fortaleza, Ce, Brazil, 60125120
        • General Hospital Fortaleza

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

will be avalueted women who will be postmenopausal, who are not taking hormone therapy in the last six months. Women with urinary loss, which does not have non-inhibited contraction of the detrusor proven by urodynamic study. Will be compared with a group of women without pelvic floor dysfunction confirmed by clinical history and gynecological examination with the same characteristics in relation to postmenopausal status, all from the general gynecology outpatient clinic.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • postmenopausal women
  • clinical diagnosis of urinary incontinence and / or pelvic organ prolapse
  • without contraction uninhibited detrusor

Exclusion Criteria:

  • cognitive deficit
  • presence of uninhibited detrusor contraction

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Control
Assessment will be carried out general quality of life beyond the functional evaluation of the pelvic floor through the PERFECT
Study
Will be held evaluate the quality of life for general and specific pelvic floor dysfunction beyond the functional assessment of the pelvic floor through the PERFECT.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Assessment of socioeconomic status by Brazil and quality of life for urinary in Brazilian women
Time Frame: one year
one year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: ISABELLA P FROTA, Pesquisadora

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2013

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 1, 2014

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

January 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 8, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 27, 2013

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

July 2, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

September 2, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 30, 2013

Last Verified

August 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • ISADRI

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Incontinence Urinary

3
Subscribe