Treo/Flu/TBI With Donor Stem Cell Transplant for Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome or Acute Myeloid Leukemia

May 13, 2021 updated by: Joachim Deeg, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

A Randomized Phase II Study of Treosulfan, Fludarabine and Low-Dose TBI as Conditioning for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) or Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

This randomized phase II trial studies how well treosulfan and fludarabine phosphate, with or without total body irradiation before donor stem cell transplant works in treating patients with myelodysplastic syndrome or acute myeloid leukemia. Giving chemotherapy, such as treosulfan and fludarabine phosphate, and total-body irradiation before a donor stem cell transplant helps stop the growth of cancer cells. It may also stop the patient's immune system from rejecting the donor's stem cells. The donated stem cells may replace the patient's immune cells and help destroy any remaining cancer cells (graft-versus-tumor effect). Sometimes the transplanted cells from a donor can also make an immune response against the body's normal cells. Giving tacrolimus before and mycophenolate mofetil after the transplant may stop this from happening.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To determine the better of two treosulfan-based conditioning regimens in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML), by comparing 6-month progression-free survival.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. Determine the effects of two conditioning regimens on changes in gene expression profiles, and evaluate the association of gene expression profiles and disease relapse.

II. Determine the incidence of progression-free survival at 1 year and 2 years after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT).

III. Evaluate overall survival (OS) at 6 months, at 1 year and at 2 years after HCT.

IV. Determine the incidence of grades II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD).

V. Determine the incidence of chronic GVHD.

VI. Determine donor chimerism around days +28 and +84.

CONDITIONING REGIMEN:

Arm A: Patients receive treosulfan intravenously (IV) over 2 hours on days -6 to -4 and fludarabine phosphate IV over 30 minutes on days -6 to -2.

Arm B: Patients receive treosulfan and fludarabine phosphate as in Arm A and undergo low-dose total-body irradiation (TBI) on day 0.

TRANSPLANT: Patients in both arms undergo allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplant or bone marrow transplant on day 0.

GVHD PROPHYLAXIS: Patients with a related donor receive tacrolimus orally (PO) every 8 or 12 hours on days -3 to 56 with taper to day 180. Beginning 4-6 hours after PBSC infusion, patients also receive mycophenolate mofetil PO every 12 hours to day 28. Patients with an unrelated donor receive tacrolimus PO every 8 or 12 hours on days -3 to 100 with taper to day 180. Beginning 4-6 hours after PBSC infusion, patients also receive mycophenolate mofetil PO every 8 hours to day 40 with taper to day 96.

NOTE: Patients with related donors eligible for FHCRC protocol 2545 may receive cyclosporine IV, instead of tacrolimus, beginning on day -3 to day 50 with a taper to day 180.

After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up periodically.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

102

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98109
        • Fred Hutch/University of Washington Cancer Consortium

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 70 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT, CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • MDS, myelodysplastic syndrome/myeloproliferative neoplasia overlap disorders (including chronic myelomonocytic leukemia [CMML], and MDS/myeloproliferative neoplasm [MPN] unclassifiable syndromes)
  • AML, other than acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL), in first or second remission or with minimal residual disease
  • With Karnofsky index or Lansky Play-Performance scale > 70% on pre-transplant evaluation
  • Able to give informed consent (if > 18 years), or with a legal guardian capable of giving informed consent (if < 18 years)
  • Patients with previous autologous or allogeneic HCT are allowed to enroll
  • DONOR: Human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-identical related donors or
  • DONOR: Unrelated donors matched for HLA-A, B, C, DRB1, and DQB1 as defined by high resolution deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) typing; mismatch for one HLA allele is allowed
  • DONOR: Donors able to undergo peripheral blood stem cell collection or bone marrow harvest
  • DONOR: Donors in good general health, with a Karnofsky or Lansky play performance score > 90%
  • DONOR: Donors able to give informed consent (if > 18 years), or with a legal guardian capable of giving informed consent (if < 18 years)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Receiving umbilical cord blood
  • With impaired cardiac function as evidenced by ejection fraction < 35% (or, if unable to obtain ejection fraction, shortening fraction of < 26%) or cardiac insufficiency requiring treatment or symptomatic coronary artery disease; patients with a shortening fraction < 26% may be enrolled if approved by a cardiologist
  • With impaired pulmonary function as evidenced by partial pressure of oxygen (pO2) < 70 mm Hg and carbon monoxide diffusing capability test (DLCO) < 70% of predicted or pO2 < 80 mm Hg and DLCO < 60% of predicted; (or, for pediatric patients unable to perform pulmonary function tests, then oxygen (O2) saturation < 92% on room air), or receiving supplementary continuous oxygen
  • With impaired renal function as evidenced by creatinine-clearance < 50% for age, weight, height or serum creatinine > 2 x upper limit of normal or dialysis-dependent
  • With hepatic dysfunction as evidenced by total bilirubin > 2.0 x upper limit of normal or evidence of synthetic dysfunction or severe cirrhosis
  • With hepatic dysfunction as evidenced by aspartate aminotransferase (AST) > 2.0 x upper limit of normal or evidence of synthetic dysfunction or severe cirrhosis
  • With active infectious disease requiring deferral of conditioning, as recommended by an infectious disease specialist
  • With human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positivity or active infectious hepatitis
  • With central nervous system (CNS) leukemic involvement not clearing with intrathecal chemotherapy, cranial irradiation or both prior to initiating conditioning (day -6)
  • Patients with active non-hematological malignancies (except non-melanoma skin cancers) or those with non-hematological malignancies who have been rendered with no evidence of disease, but have a greater than 20% chance of having disease recurrence within 5 years; this exclusion does not apply to patients with non-hematologic malignancies that do not require therapy
  • With life expectancy severely limited by diseases other than malignancy
  • Women who are pregnant or lactating
  • With known hypersensitivity to treosulfan or fludarabine (fludarabine phosphate)
  • Receiving another experimental drug within 4 weeks before initiation of conditioning (day -6)
  • Unable to give informed consent (if > 18 years) or with a legal guardian (if < 18 years) unable to give informed consent
  • DONOR: Individuals deemed unable to undergo marrow harvesting or PBSC mobilization and leukapheresis
  • DONOR: Individuals who are HIV-positive
  • DONOR: Individuals with active infectious hepatitis
  • DONOR: Females with a positive pregnancy test
  • DONOR: Persons unable to give informed consent (if > 18 years) or with a legal guardian (if < 18 years) unable to give informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Arm A

Arm A: Treosulfan, Fludarabine Phosphate

Treosulfan intravenously (IV) over 2 hours on days -6 to -4 and fludarabine phosphate IV over 30 minutes on days -6 to -2.

Undergo TBI
Other Names:
  • Whole-Body Irradiation
  • TOTAL BODY IRRADIATION
Undergo allogeneic PBSC transplant
Other Names:
  • PBPC transplantation
  • Peripheral Blood Progenitor Cell Transplantation
  • Peripheral Stem Cell Support
  • Peripheral Stem Cell Transplantation
Correlative Studies
Undergo allogeneic bone marrow transplant
Other Names:
  • Allo BMT
  • Allogeneic BMT
Intravenously administered Fludarabine Phosphate
Other Names:
  • 2-F-ara-AMP
  • Beneflur
  • Fludara
  • SH T 586
Intravenously administered Treosulfan
Other Names:
  • 1,2,3, 4-Butanetetrol, 1,4-dimethanesulfonate, [R-(R*,S*)]-
  • Dihydroxybusulfan
  • Ovastat
  • Treosulphan
  • Tresulfon
Experimental: Arm B

Arm B: Treosulfan, Fludarabine Phosphate, TBI

Treosulfan and fludarabine phosphate as in Arm A and undergo low -dose total-body irradiation (TBI) on day 0

Undergo allogeneic PBSC transplant
Other Names:
  • PBPC transplantation
  • Peripheral Blood Progenitor Cell Transplantation
  • Peripheral Stem Cell Support
  • Peripheral Stem Cell Transplantation
Correlative Studies
Undergo allogeneic bone marrow transplant
Other Names:
  • Allo BMT
  • Allogeneic BMT
Intravenously administered Fludarabine Phosphate
Other Names:
  • 2-F-ara-AMP
  • Beneflur
  • Fludara
  • SH T 586
Intravenously administered Treosulfan
Other Names:
  • 1,2,3, 4-Butanetetrol, 1,4-dimethanesulfonate, [R-(R*,S*)]-
  • Dihydroxybusulfan
  • Ovastat
  • Treosulphan
  • Tresulfon

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants That Did Not Progress Within 6 Months
Time Frame: At 6 months post-transplant
Progression is defined as relapse
At 6 months post-transplant

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Acute GVHD, Graded by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0
Time Frame: Up to 84 days
Up to 84 days
Incidence of Chronic GVHD Graded by the NCI CTCAE Version 4.0
Time Frame: Up to 5 year
Up to 5 year
Incidence of Relapse/Progression
Time Frame: Up to 5 year
Up to 5 year
NRM
Time Frame: Up to 5 years
Up to 5 years
Overall Survival (OS)
Time Frame: Up to 2 year
Up to 2 year
Change in Gene Expression Profiles
Time Frame: Baseline and at day 0 within 6 hours of conditioning prior to transplant
Differences between arms in the changes in gene expression will be compared. 80% power to detect mean differences of approximately 1.4 standard deviation units, at the 2-sided 0.05 level of significance (with Bonferroni correction for 50 genes).
Baseline and at day 0 within 6 hours of conditioning prior to transplant
Relapse Risk as Measured by Degree of Change in Gene Expression Profiles
Time Frame: Baseline and at day 0 within 6 hours of conditioning prior to transplant
Among genes identified whose expression is modified by conditioning, degree of change in expression will be evaluated to determine if it is correlated with relapse risk and offers improved prediction of relapse risk over that obtained with standard clinical parameters (cytogenetics, blast count, International Prognostic Scoring System score, minimal residual disease. To account for censoring and the competing risk of non-relapse mortality (NRM), the analysis will be a time-to-event analysis of relapse using Cox regression, with change in expression as a continuous covariate (on a log scale). 8
Baseline and at day 0 within 6 hours of conditioning prior to transplant

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: H. Joachim Deeg, Fred Hutch/University of Washington Cancer Consortium

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 9, 2017

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 1, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 3, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

July 10, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 3, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 13, 2021

Last Verified

May 1, 2021

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia

Clinical Trials on Total-Body Irradiation

3
Subscribe