Efficacy of Intravenous Ibuprofen Compared to Intravenous Ketorolac for Pain Control Following Arthroscopic Knee Surgery

February 12, 2016 updated by: Cumberland Pharmaceuticals

A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Study to Determine the Efficacy of Intravenous Ibuprofen Compared to Intravenous Ketorolac for Pain Control Following Arthroscopic Knee Surgery

The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of intravenous ibuprofen compared to ketorolac for the treatment of postoperative pain as measured by patient pain intensity (Visual Analog Scale, VAS)

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States, 33316
        • Shrock Orthopedic Research
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60612
        • Rush University Medical Center
    • Mississippi
      • Tupelo, Mississippi, United States, 38801
        • North Mississippi Sports Medicine & Orthopaedic Clinic
    • Ohio
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43210
        • The Ohio State University Vexner Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients scheduled for knee arthroscopy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inadequate IV access.
  • History of allergy or hypersensitivity to any component of ibuprofen, ketorolac, aspirin (or aspirin related products), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), opioids or cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors.
  • Less than 18 years of age.
  • Use of analgesics less than 8 hours prior to surgery.
  • Patients with active, clinically significant anemia.
  • History or evidence of asthma or heart failure.
  • Pregnant.
  • Recent history of chronic opioid use.
  • Concomitant use of probenecid.
  • Inability to understand the requirements of the study, be willing to provide written informed consent (as evidenced by signature on an informed consent document approved by an Institutional Review Board [IRB]), and agree to abide by the study restrictions and to return for the required assessments.
  • Refusal to provide written authorization for use and disclosure of protected health information.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: IV ibuprofen
800mg ibuprofen
Other Names:
  • Caldolor
Active Comparator: ketorolac
30mg ketorolac
Other Names:
  • Ketorolac Tromethamine

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Efficacy of Pain Relief (Pain Intensity at Rest)
Time Frame: First possible time post-surgery, an expected average of 6 hours
Pain assessed using VAS (Visual Analog Scale, VAS). The VAS is a continuous scale compromised of a horizontal line, one hundred millimeters in length, anchored by 2 verbal descriptors (No Pain, Worst Possible Pain). The VAS is self-completed by the respondent. The respondent is asked to place a line perpendicular to the VAS line at the point that represents their pain intensity. Using a ruler, the score is determined by measuring the distance, in mm, on the 100 mm line between the "No Pain" anchor and the subject's mark. The score would be between 0 (No Pain) and 100 (Worst Possible Pain).
First possible time post-surgery, an expected average of 6 hours
Efficacy of Pain Relief (Pain Intensity With Movement)
Time Frame: First possible time post-surgery, an expected average of 6 hours
Pain assessed using VAS (Visual Analog Scale, VAS). The VAS is a continuous scale compromised of a horizontal line, one hundred millimeters in length, anchored by 2 verbal descriptors (No Pain, Worst Possible Pain). The VAS is self-completed by the respondent. The respondent is asked to place a line perpendicular to the VAS line at the point that represents their pain intensity. Using a ruler, the score is determined by measuring the distance, in mm, on the 100 mm line between the "No Pain" anchor and the subject's mark. The score would be between 0 (No Pain) and 100 (Worst Possible Pain).
First possible time post-surgery, an expected average of 6 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rescue Medication Use in Post-operative Period
Time Frame: Post-operative period until discharge, an expected average of 6 hours
Amount of rescue medication (in milligrams) will be measured
Post-operative period until discharge, an expected average of 6 hours
Time to First Use of Rescue Med Will be Measured
Time Frame: Post-operative period until discharge, an expected average of 6 hours
Time to first rescue medication (in hours) in the postoperative period through discharge.
Post-operative period until discharge, an expected average of 6 hours
Patient Satisfaction
Time Frame: Post-operative period until discharge, an expected average of 6 hours
Measured using 2 question, 4 point scale.
Post-operative period until discharge, an expected average of 6 hours
Incidence of Serious Adverse Events
Time Frame: Post-operative period until discharge, an expected average of 6 hours
Number of subjects experiencing treatment-emergent serious adverse events
Post-operative period until discharge, an expected average of 6 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Arthur P Wheeler, MD, Cumberland Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 12, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 15, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

July 17, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 14, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 12, 2016

Last Verified

February 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on IV ibuprofen

3
Subscribe