Cosmetic Outcome Study of Lid Laceration Repair With Suture Versus Tissue Adhesive

December 2, 2014 updated by: Judianne Kellaway, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial of Tissue Adhesive (Octyl-2-Cyanoacrylate) vs. Traditional Suture in Traumatic Lid Laceration Repair

This project is a randomized, controlled trial investigating wound cosmetic appearance after repair of traumatic lid lacerations with three different approaches to skin closure: absorbable sutures, non-absorbable sutures, and tissue adhesive. Photographs will be taken at two intervals after repair and later blindly assessed using standard cosmetic assessment scales. The investigators hypothesize that cosmetic wound outcome will be equivalent in across all three treatment arms.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This project is a randomized, controlled trial investigating the cosmetic appearance after repair of traumatic lid lacerations with three different approaches to skin closure: absorbable sutures (surgical gut suture), non-absorbable sutures (polypropylene suture), and tissue adhesive (octyl-2-cyanoacrylate). The population will include patients presenting to Memorial Hermann Hospital requiring repair of traumatic lid lacerations. The study will include partial thickness, full-thickness, and margin-involving lacerations where first standard layered tarsal and marginal suture repair will be performed if necessary, and then the patient will be randomized to superficial skin closure with either polypropylene suture closure, surgical gut suture closure, or tissue adhesive closure. Subjects will be followed in an outpatient setting at 1 week and 1 month post-repair at which time standardized photographs will be taken and later assessed using two standardized appearance assessment tools: Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Hollander Wound Evaluation Score (HWES).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

4

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Memorial Hermann Hospital - Texas Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years of age or older.
  • Any laceration caused by trauma and involving the skin of the upper and/or lower eyelid.
  • Must be able to understand and sign an informed consent when applicable and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act(HIPAA) form that has been approved by an Institutional Review Board (IRB) or follow standard informed consent procedure of the IRB

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Eyelid lacerations that include avulsion or missing eyelid tissue
  • Patients with known hypersensitivity to octyl-2-cyanoacrylate or previous poor reaction to octyl-2-cyanoacrylate
  • Eyelid lacerations resulting in necrosis or ischemia of tissue prior to repair
  • Patients who demonstrate intoxication or mental status changes that would make them unfit to provide informed consent for repair

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Non-absorbable suture skin closure
The superficial eyelid skin will be repaired with simple interrupted sutures with non-absorbable suture (6-0 polypropylene) after repair of any deep component of the laceration.
The approach to repair will follow standard technique. If eyelid marginal component is present, margin repair will be performed with two 6-0 interrupted silk sutures: one at the gray line and one at the lash line. If the tarsus requires reapproximation, this will carefully be done using interrupted polyglactin vicryl sutures. The superficial skin will then be repaired with either non-absorbable sutures (6-0 polypropylene).
Other Names:
  • prolene
  • polypropylene
Experimental: Absorbable suture skin closure
The superficial eyelid skin will be repaired with simple interrupted sutures with absorbable suture (surgical gut) after repair of any deep component of the laceration.
The approach to repair will follow standard technique. If eyelid marginal component is present, margin repair will be performed with two 6-0 interrupted silk sutures: one at the gray line and one at the lash line. If the tarsus requires reapproximation, this will carefully be done using interrupted polyglactin vicryl sutures. The superficial skin will then be repaired with absorbable sutures (surgical gut).
Other Names:
  • gut
  • surgical gut
Experimental: Tissue Adhesive skin closure
The superficial eyelid skin will be repaired with layers of tissue adhesive (octyl-2-cyanoacrylate) after repair of any deep component of the laceration.
The approach to repair will follow standard technique. If eyelid marginal component is present, margin repair will be performed with two 6-0 interrupted silk sutures: one at the gray line and one at the lash line. If the tarsus requires reapproximation, this will carefully be done using interrupted polyglactin vicryl sutures. The superficial skin will then be repaired with tissue adhesive (octyl-2-cyanoacrylate).
Other Names:
  • octyl-2-cyanoacrylate
  • cyanoacrylate
  • tissue adhesive

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cosmetic wound appearance
Time Frame: 1 month after repair
Cosmetic appearance will be assessed using two wound assessment methods: the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the Hollander Wound Evaluation Scale (HWES).
1 month after repair

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Judianne Kellaway, MD, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 30, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 5, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

August 7, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 3, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 2, 2014

Last Verified

December 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HSC-MS-13-0276

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Eyelid Laceration

Clinical Trials on Non-absorbable suture skin closure

Subscribe