Study of the Efficacy of New Non-invasive Prenatal Tests for Screening for Fetal Trisomies Using Maternal Blood (PEGASUS)

February 21, 2018 updated by: CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval

PEGASUS: PErsonalized Genomics for Prenatal Aneuploidy Screening USing Maternal Blood

Each year, 450,000 Canadian women become pregnant and, as a result of their participation in prenatal screening for Down syndrome, approximately 10,000 of them will have an amniocentesis (i.e. sampling of liquid surrounding the fetus) and of those, 315 will be found to carry a baby with Down syndrome and 70 normal pregnancies will be lost from complications of the procedure. It has been discovered recently that, during pregnancy, there is fetal DNA in maternal blood in sufficient quantities to be analysed and methods have been proposed to detect the presence or not of a fetus with Down syndrome using maternal blood. The introduction of genomic blood testing as proposed in the context of this project could lead to increased detection of Down syndrome, less invasive screening with 9700 amniocentesis avoided each year in Canada, improving the peace of mind of pregnant women, and preventing the accidental loss of 70 normal fetuses, at a lower overall cost than current practice. However, these methods still need to be validated before being appropriately introduced in routine care.

The study hypothesis is that new genomics-based non-invasive methods using fetal-DNA in maternal blood during pregnancy can be more effective than current prenatal screening methods for fetal aneuploidy.

This project will carry out an independent study that will validate the performance and utility of different new genomic technologies for screening in pregnant women using maternal blood. The team of researchers will compare the real-life performance of different non-invasive assays and strategies to screen for fetal aneuploidy, and identify an evidence-based cost-effective approach for implementation of this new technology in the Canadian health care system. The deliverables of this project will enable decision makers, pregnant women and their partner to make informed choices pertaining to prenatal genetic screening and diagnosis, such as screening for Down syndrome, and reduce the risk to pregnancies associated with amniocentesis.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The present study is a real life comparative effectiveness study that will compare the performances and costs of several prenatal screening modalities for fetal aneuploidy (see interventions).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

3819

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alberta
      • Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2N 2T9
        • Foothills Medical Centre
    • British Columbia
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6H 3N1
        • Children's & Women's Health Centre
    • Ontario
      • Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1H 8L6
        • The Ottawa Hospital
    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3T 1C5
        • CHU Ste-Justine
      • Quebec City, Quebec, Canada, G1L3L5
        • CHU de Québec

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria (High risk arm):

  • women 19 years or older between 10 weeks and 23 weeks 6 days gestation undergoing amniocentesis or CVS for:
  • positive prenatal screen;
  • abnormal ultrasound
  • previous pregnancy with trisomy
  • patient or partner carrier of Robertsonian translocation involving chr 21
  • positive NIPT result
  • Maternal age 40 or more

Inclusion Criteria (Low risk arm):

  • women 19 years and older who are 10 and 13 weeks 6 days gestation based on dating ultrasound (CRL) and are undergoing screening for Down syndrome (first trimester combined, SIPS or IPS)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • women with multiple gestations
  • women with twin demise (spontaneous or elective) at any gestational age
  • women with active or history of malignancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Low Risk of aneuploidy
Integrated prenatal screening for Down's syndrome (with follow-up fetal karyotype if positive); Serum QUAD Assay for aneuploidy screening; Semiconductor MPSS NIPT assay using ccfDNA in maternal blood; Optical-based MPSS NIPT assay using ccfDNA in maternal blood; Harmony™ Test (Ariosa Diagnostics)
Analysis of several serum biochemical markers, and fetal nuchal translucency by ultrasound, with computation of an individual risk of fetal aneuploidy.
Other Names:
  • IPS
  • Prenatal serum screening
  • Aneuploidy screening
  • Down's syndrome screening
  • Downs' syndrome screening
Series of biochemical markers with results integrated into a computational estimate of risk of fetal aneuploidy
Other Names:
  • First trimester QUAD prenatal screening assay
Analysis by next-generation sequencing of ccfDNA (circulating cell-free DNA) from maternal blood, using a targeted NIPT assay.
Other Names:
  • NIPD
  • MPSS
  • Non-invasive prenatal testing
  • Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis
Analysis by next-generation sequencing of ccfDNA (circulating cell-free DNA) from maternal blood, using an un-targeted NIPT assay.
Other Names:
  • NIPD
  • MPSS
  • Non-invasive prenatal testing
  • Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis
  • Un-Targeted NIPD
Test that is commercially available (Ariosa Diagnostics). (will be used for benchmarking purposes in a subset of each arm)
Other Names:
  • DANSR Assay
Experimental: High risk of aneuploidy
Integrated prenatal screening for Down's syndrome (with follow-up fetal karyotype if positive); Serum QUAD Assay for aneuploidy screening; Semiconductor MPSS NIPT assay using ccfDNA in maternal blood; Optical-based MPSS NIPT assay using ccfDNA in maternal blood; Harmony™ Test (Ariosa Diagnostics) (subset)
Analysis of several serum biochemical markers, and fetal nuchal translucency by ultrasound, with computation of an individual risk of fetal aneuploidy.
Other Names:
  • IPS
  • Prenatal serum screening
  • Aneuploidy screening
  • Down's syndrome screening
  • Downs' syndrome screening
Series of biochemical markers with results integrated into a computational estimate of risk of fetal aneuploidy
Other Names:
  • First trimester QUAD prenatal screening assay
Analysis by next-generation sequencing of ccfDNA (circulating cell-free DNA) from maternal blood, using a targeted NIPT assay.
Other Names:
  • NIPD
  • MPSS
  • Non-invasive prenatal testing
  • Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis
Analysis by next-generation sequencing of ccfDNA (circulating cell-free DNA) from maternal blood, using an un-targeted NIPT assay.
Other Names:
  • NIPD
  • MPSS
  • Non-invasive prenatal testing
  • Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis
  • Un-Targeted NIPD
Test that is commercially available (Ariosa Diagnostics). (will be used for benchmarking purposes in a subset of each arm)
Other Names:
  • DANSR Assay

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of cases with Fetal trisomy 21, 18 or 13
Time Frame: 6 weeks after the delivery date
Only pregnant women will be recruited, fetal outcome will be assessed by fetal karyotype or at or after delivery.
6 weeks after the delivery date

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Number of women with assay failure
Time Frame: At end of pregnancy.
At end of pregnancy.

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Overall costs of screening algorithm
Time Frame: 6 weeks after delivery
6 weeks after delivery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Francois Rousseau, MD MSc FRCPC, Universite Laval and CHU de Quebec

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 16, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 16, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

August 20, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 22, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 21, 2018

Last Verified

April 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Trisomy 21

Clinical Trials on Integrated prenatal screening for Down's syndrome

Subscribe