- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01941472
Transcutaneous pO2, Transcutaneous pCO2 and Central Venous SO2 Variations to Define Fluid Responsiveness
March 3, 2017 updated by: Bin Du, Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Fluid challenge is often carried out in critical ill patients.
Its responsiveness usually requires invasive monitoring.
To use non-invasive methods is very tempting.
Investigators hypothesize that transcutaneous pO2,transcutaneous pCO2 and Central Venous SO2 variations provide feasible estimation on fluid responsiveness in critical ill patients.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
40
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Beijing
-
Peking, Beijing, China, 100000
- MICU of Peking Union Medical College Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18 years and older ICU patients;
- Septic shock;
- Monitored with PICCO or Swan-Ganz catheter;
- The decision of fluid challenge made by the treating physician;
Exclusion Criteria:
- Evidence of fluid overload;
- Pregnancy
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Screening
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Septic shock
Adult patients (at least 18 years of age) with refractory hypotension secondary to sepsis who, at the discretion of treating physicians, required fluid challenge in the presence of invasive hemodynamic monitoring.
Refractory hypotension was defined as need of vasopressors to maintain systolic blood pressure (SBP) no less than 90 mmHg despite adequate fluid resuscitation.
|
A bag of 500ml of normal saline or 4% gelatin (Gelofusine, B. Braun Medical (Suzhou) Company Limited, Suzhou, China) is infused within 15 minutes using a bag pressurized to 300 mmHg.
All other treatments, including maintenance fluids, dose of vasoactive agents and ventilator settings, remain unchanged during the study period.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Fluid Responsiveness
Time Frame: Immediately after fluid challenge, average 5 minutes
|
Increase in cardiac index ≥ 10% after fluid challenge
|
Immediately after fluid challenge, average 5 minutes
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Liu G, Huang H, Qin H, Du B. [Predictive value of central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure difference for fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients: a prospective clinical study]. Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2018 May;30(5):449-455. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2018.05.011. Chinese.
- Xu B, Yang X, Wang C, Jiang W, Weng L, Hu X, Peng J, Du B. Changes of central venous oxygen saturation define fluid responsiveness in patients with septic shock: A prospective observational study. J Crit Care. 2017 Apr;38:13-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.09.030. Epub 2016 Oct 19.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
September 1, 2013
Primary Completion (Actual)
December 1, 2015
Study Completion (Actual)
December 1, 2015
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
August 31, 2013
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 9, 2013
First Posted (Estimate)
September 13, 2013
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
April 4, 2017
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 3, 2017
Last Verified
March 1, 2017
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- MICU2013-1
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Shock
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisTraumabase Group; Capgemini Invent; Ecole polytechnique; EHESS (Ecole des hautes... and other collaboratorsCompletedWounds and Injuries | Hemorrhagic Shock | Traumatic ShockFrance
-
Biomedizinische Forschungs gmbHMedical University of ViennaCompletedSepsis | Toxic-Shock Syndrome
-
Haukeland University HospitalMinistry of Defence, NorwayCompletedHemorrhagic Shock | Hypovolemic ShockNorway
-
King's College Hospital NHS TrustUniversity Hospital BirminghamCompletedTraumatic Haemorrhagic ShockUnited Kingdom
-
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases...Completed
-
Assiut UniversityUnknown
-
Massachusetts General HospitalBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Boston Medical Center; Tufts Medical Center and other collaboratorsRecruiting
-
Jason SperryNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)TerminatedHemorrhagic ShockUnited States
-
University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterUniversity of Washington; Resuscitation Outcomes ConsortiumCompletedHemorrhagic ShockUnited States
-
University of ManitobaCanadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR); CancerCare ManitobaTerminatedSeptic Shock | Vasodilatory ShockCanada, United States, Brazil, Greece, India, Pakistan, Philippines
Clinical Trials on fluid challenge
-
University Hospital Hradec KraloveUniversity Hospital PilsenCompletedSepsis | Septic Shock | Surgery | Endothelial Dysfunction | AnesthesiaCzechia
-
Bicetre HospitalRecruiting
-
Università Politecnica delle MarcheUniversità Politecnica delle Marche, Ospedali riuniti di AnconaRecruitingMicrocirculation | Venous Congestion | Volume ExpansionItaly
-
Pontificia Universidad Catolica de ChileFondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico, ChileNot yet recruiting
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, AmiensCentre Hospitalier Universitaire DijonCompletedOxygen Consumption | Critical Care | Fluid ChallengeFrance
-
Humanitas Clinical and Research CenterCompletedAnesthesia, General | Cardiovascular System | NeurosurgeryItaly
-
Central Hospital, Nancy, FranceUnknownShock, Septic | Aortic Stenosis | Oliguria | Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal | Hyperlactatemia | Aortic Aneurysm, RupturedFrance
-
University Medical Center GroningenCompleted
-
Corporacion Parc TauliRecruiting