Clinical Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Two Teriparatide Formulations: Osteofortil and Forteo

January 21, 2014 updated by: Bio Sidus SA

Comparación de la Eficacia y Seguridad clínicas de Osteofortil Respecto de Forteo

The primary objective of this study is to compare efficacy and safety of two formulations of teriparatide 20 mcg/day plus calcium and vitamin D in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

110

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina
        • Instituto de Investigaciones Metabólicas

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years to 81 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

I. Female.

II. Age greater than or equal to 50 and less than 81 years.

III. Last menstrual period at least one year prior to signing the informed consent.

IV. Osteoporosis. Defined by the presence of:

BMD by DEXA with a T-score of -2.5 or lower on lumbar spine or T-score at the lumbar spine, femoral neck or total hip -2.0 or below, together with one or more vertebral fractures documented by lateral spine radiographs.

V. Have signed the informed consent

-

Exclusion Criteria:

I Bone alkaline phosphatase in the blood above the normal limit without any explanation.

II. Liver disease (AST or ALT> 2 x ULN). III. Renal disease (serum creatinine> 2.0 mg / dl) and / or creatinine clearance <30 ml / min IV. Hypercalcemia ([Ca]> 10.5 mg / dL). Patients with elevated PTH in the presence of albumin-corrected calcium within normal values can be re-evaluated.

V. Elevated blood PTH ([PTH]> 65 pg / ml) Patients with elevated PTH in the presence of albumin-corrected calcium within normal values can be re-evaluated.

VI. • Deficiency of vitamin D (25-OH vitamin D <16 ng / ml) or excess vitamin D (above 80 ng / ml blood). Patients who did not meet the inclusion criteria for vitamin D may receive a supplement (vitamin D) and be re-evaluated.

VII. • Anemia (hematocrit <32%).

VIII. • History of cancer (except basal cell carcinoma) or radiotherapy.

IX. Severe cardiopulmonary disease, including coronary heart disease: unstable angina, heart failure class III or IV or any other condition that the investigator believes may prevent participation safely and complete the protocol procedures.

X. Major psychiatric disease that in the opinion of the investigator, would prevent to give properinformed consent or complete the study procedures.

XI. Excessive alcohol or substance abuse that in the opinion of the investigator prevents giving informed consent or complete proper protocol procedures.

XII. Congenital or acquired bone disease, other than osteoporosis (including osteomalacia, hyperparathyroidism or Paget's disease)

XIII. Regarding the history of ingestion of oral bisphosphonates: After assessment of adequate adherence (compliance greater than 75%), if the patient received six months of treatment, she should have a bisphosphonate-free period of six months. If she took more than six months, the bisphosphonate-free period must be 12 months.

XIV. Current or within the last 3 months before study entry estrogen use, selective estrogen receptor modulators use or calcitonin use in therapeutic doses.

XV. Current use of systemic corticosteroids (oral or parenteral) for more than 14 days in the last 6 months. Vaginal estrogen and isoflavones are permitted .

XVI.Current or previous use of teriparatide, other PTH analogues as patches or injectables, strontium, fluorine or any intravenous bisphosphonate therapeutic dose, XVII. Known hypersensitivity to pharmaceuticals derived from bacterial cells. XVIII. Hypersensitivity to teriparatide or to any of its excipients. XIX.Nephrolithiasis or urolithiasis in activity, according to the investigator opinion in the 5 years prior to randomization.

XX.Inflammatory bowel disease, malabsorption syndrome or any sign of intestinal calcium malabsorption

XXI. Treatment with androgens or anabolic steroids in the 6 months prior to randomization.

XXII. Any medical condition that in the investigator opinion would contraindicate treatment with an investigational drug.

XXIII. Treatment with coumarin and indandione derivatives in the 3 months prior to randomization or treatment with heparins (at doses> 10,000 U / day) for more than 30 days in the 6 months prior to randomization.

XXIV.Treatment with any other drug known to affect bone metabolism, in therapeutic doses,in the 6 months prior to randomization.

XXV.Treatment with an investigational drug during the month prior to randomization. -

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Teriparatide Forteo
20 micrograms/day plus calcium and vitamin D
EXPERIMENTAL: Teriparatide Osteofortil
20 micrograms/day plus calcium and vitamin D

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change from baseline in Bone mineral Density at 6 months.
Time Frame: Basal, Six months and One Year
Basal, Six months and One Year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change from baseline in P1NP, Osteocalcin, C-terminal cross-linked telopeptide of type I collagen levels at 3 and 6 months
Time Frame: Basal, 3, 6 and 12 months
Basal, 3, 6 and 12 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change from baseline on bone mineral density asessed by High-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) at 6 months
Time Frame: Basal, six months and one year.
Basal, six months and one year.
Number of patients with elevated serum calcium
Time Frame: Basal, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months
Basal, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2013

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

October 1, 2014

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

November 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 11, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 16, 2013

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

September 19, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

January 22, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 21, 2014

Last Verified

September 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postmenopausal Osteoporosis With Pathological Fracture

Clinical Trials on Teriparatide (rDNA origin)

3
Subscribe