Effectiveness of a Multifactorial Intervention on Frailty

November 8, 2017 updated by: Jordi Gol i Gurina Foundation

Effectiveness of a Multifactorial Intervention to Modify Frailty Parameters in Elderly Population

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of a multifactorial intervention program based on physical activity and diet, memory workshops and review of medication, to modify frailty parameters, muscle strength and physical and cognitive performance in people 65 years or older with a positive screening for frailty. Secondly, to assess changes in falls, hospitalizations, nutritional risk, disability and institutionalization or home-care.

Methods: randomized clinical trial with a control group, of one year and a half of follow-up, conducted in eight primary care teams in Barcelona. Individuals to be included are 65 years or older with positive frailty screening, timed get-up-and-go between 10 to 30 seconds, and cognitive Lobo test greater than or equal to 18. 165 patients will be selected in each group (difference to be detected on physical performance (Short physical performance battery (SPPB)): 0.5 units; common Standard Deviation : 1.42, 20% lost to follow-up).

Intervention: consists in three different actions on frailty dimensions, applied to each subject in the intervention group, in groups of 15 participants: rehabilitative therapy plus intake of hyperproteic shakes, memory workshop and review of the medication.

Evaluations will be blinded and conducted at 0, 3 and 18 months. Analysis of variance for repeated measures to adjust for differences attributable to intervention effect and for potential confounders such as comorbidity, sensory limitations, social risk, other medical or social interventions, among others.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

352

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Barcelona, Spain
        • Institut Català de la Salut

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Positive Barber screen
  • Timed get-up-and-go 10 to 20 seconds
  • cognitive Lobo test greater than or equal to 18

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Home Care
  • Institutionalization
  • Conditions not allowing physical exercise

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Multifactorial Intervention
Intervention consists in three different actions on frailty dimensions, applied to each subject in the intervention group, in groups of 15 participants: rehabilitative therapy plus intake of hyperproteic shakes, memory workshop and review of the medication.
Intervention consists in three different actions on frailty dimensions, applied to each subject in the intervention group, in groups of 15 participants: rehabilitative therapy and physical exercise plus intake of hyperproteic shakes, memory workshop and review of the medication.
Other Names:
  • Multifactorial intervention on frailty dimensions
No Intervention: No intervention
Usual care

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline in Short Physical performance battery at 3 and 18 months
Time Frame: 0,3,18 months
The Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) is a standardised assessment tool of lower limb function, testing 3 dimensions: standing balance, walking speed, and chair stands. Each component is scored between 0-4, total score from 0 (poor performance) to 12 (best performance).
0,3,18 months
Change from Baseline in Muscle strength at 3 and 18 months
Time Frame: 0,3,18 months
Evaluation of upper extremities strength was assessed through the measurement of force with a handgrip dynamometer. Grip strength was evaluated using a portable hand dynamometer (JAMAR®0-90 kg, coding 506320). The participants were seated with their shoulder in a neutral position and their elbow flexed at 90°. Three attempts were performed alternately in each hand; the mean of the three measures was recorded.
0,3,18 months
Change from Baseline in Cognitive Performance (Barcelona test) at 3 and 18 months
Time Frame: 0,3,18 months
The first neuro-psychometric instrument developed in Spain to measure semi-quantitatively cognitive status in clinical neurology was the Barcelona Test (BT). Shortened version of the BT, named Barcelona Test Review (BTR) had been used for neuropsychological area evaluation in our participants and it takes only 20-30 minutes to administer
0,3,18 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants with Falls during follow-up, at 18 months
Time Frame: 18 months
18 months
Change from Baseline in Functional Capacity at 18 months
Time Frame: 18 months
Barthel Index Lawton&Brody Index
18 months
Number of Participants Hospitalized during follow-up, at 18 months
Time Frame: 18 months
18 months
Number of Participants Institutionalized during follow-up, at 18 months
Time Frame: 18 months
18 months
Number of Participants included in Home Health care during follow-up, at 18 months
Time Frame: 18 months
18 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Josep Maria segura, MD, Phd, Jordi Gol Foundation

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 1, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 21, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

October 25, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 13, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 8, 2017

Last Verified

March 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PI12/01503

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cognitive Impairment

Clinical Trials on Multifactorial intervention

3
Subscribe