Comparative Study of Rituximab Versus Combination of Rituximab and Intravenous Cyclophosphamide in Severe Pemphigus

October 29, 2014 updated by: Uprety Shraddha

A PILOT STUDY TO ASSESS THE EFFICACY OF RITUXIMAB VERSUS COMBINATION OF RITUXIMAB AND INTRAVENOUS CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE IN THE TREATMENT OF REFRACTORY PEMPHIGUS

The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of rituximab alone vs combination of rituximab and cyclophosphamide in the treatment of pemphigus not responding adequately to routine medications.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

20

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Chandigarh, India, 160012
        • PGIMER
      • Chandigarh, India, 160012
        • Post-graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with the diagnosis of pemphigus based on clinical, histopathological and immunological features the following:
  • Refractory disease defined as continuing extension of old lesions, development of new lesion, or failure of established lesions to begin to heal despite 3 weeks of therapy on 1.5 mg/kg/day of prednisolone or its equivalent with or without the concurrent use of cyclophosphamide 2mg/kg/day for 12 weeks or azathioprine 2.5 mg/kg/day for 12 weeks. Patients who fail to respond to 6 DCP/DP are also considered as refractory disease.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Infections- Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C, HIV, active tuberculosis or sepsis.
  • Abnormal liver function tests and renal function tests
  • Known cardiac arrhythmia or conduction abnormality
  • Systolic ejection fraction <40%
  • Pregnancy and breast feeding
  • Severely decreased bone marrow functions.
  • Known history of bladder cancer or hemorrhagic cystitis
  • Known allergy to cyclophosphamide
  • Patients of reproductive age group who haven't completed their family
  • Known hypersensitivity to murine proteins.
  • Patients who do not consent for the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Rituximab
Inj Rituximab 1 gram IV given on day 0 and day 15
Active Comparator: Combination of Rituximab and Cyclophosphamide IV
IV Rituximab 1gram on day 0 and 15 750 mg IV cyclophosphamide in 250 ml of NS over 2-3 hr on day 1 and day 16

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Study the clinical efficacy of IV rituximab vs IV rituximab and IV cyclophosphamide combination for treatment of refractory pemphigus in terms of early and late end points as defined by the international pemphigus committee
Time Frame: upto 9 months

Primary outcome measures being

  1. Time taken for control of disease activity
  2. Time taken for achievement of partial remission
  3. Time taken for achievement of complete remission
upto 9 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Study the characteristics of B cell depletion and repopulation following IV rituximab and combination of IV cyclophosphamide with IV rituximab.
Time Frame: upto 9 months
Flowcytometric analysis of CD19+ve27-ve naïve B cells count, CD19+ve27+ve memory B cells count and CD24highCD38high transitional cell count will be performed at baseline, 3rd month, 6th month and 9th month.
upto 9 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
To study the difference in relapse rate
Time Frame: upto 9 months
upto 9 months
to study the total cumulative dose of corticosteroids adminstered and adjuvants required among patients of the 2 treatment groups
Time Frame: upto 9 months
upto 9 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Shraddha Uprety, MBBS, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2015

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 4, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 27, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

November 1, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 30, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 29, 2014

Last Verified

October 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pemphigus

Clinical Trials on Rituximab and Cyclophosphamide IV

3
Subscribe