A Pilot Study to Assess the Influence of Dietary Organic Acids on Iron Absorption.

November 18, 2013 updated by: dora pereira, Medical Research Council
Iron deficiency is the most common micronutrient deficiency in the world today, affecting more than 60% of the global population (www.who.int/nut/ida.htm). The two main strategies for the prevention and treatment of iron deficiency involve fortification of food with iron, or direct supplementation with iron tablets. Simple iron salts (e.g. ferrous sulphate) are well absorbed but at supplemental levels (and potentially at lower levels, as used in food fortificants) can induce free radical activity resulting in gastrointestinal side effects and systematic oxidative stress. As a result, supplementation has poor compliance and improvement in iron status is compromised. Ferric salts are less inclined to produce side effects and although they are relatively well absorbed at fortification levels in food, they are poorly absorbed at the higher supplemental doses. Because certain components of food, such as organic acids, can facilitate ferric iron absorption, we now wish to determine whether dietary organic acids may similarly enable efficient absorption of supplemental ferric iron while preventing the formation of non-transferrin-bound iron (NTBI) which is a proxy for free radical activity. Our strategy is to use an iterative process between in vitro and in vivo experimentation, aimed at identifying the best choice of organic acid and the optimal ratio of iron:organic acid. The study was a cross-over, single-dose comparison against standard-of-care therapy (namely ferrous sulphate) in mildly iron deficient anaemic women. Both the investigational products and the active comparator were administered as a single dose on 2 different occasions, i.e. the investigational products on the first study visit and the active comparator 14 days later on the second study visit.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The study was a first-in-human iron absorption study of ferric iron oxide-organic acid preparations (Fe-OAs). The study design was cross-over, single-dose, single-blinded comparison against standard-of-care therapy (namely ferrous sulphate) in mildly iron deficient anaemic women. Methyl-cellulose capsules containing single doses of Fe-OAs (60 mg elemental iron equivalent) were given to four subjects per test mixture to determine iron absorption and bioavailability. The study was initially designed in 2 parts (A and B). Part A was an iterative process to determine the best choice of organic acids and the optimal ratio of iron to organic acid that allowed efficient iron absorption, while part B was a comparison of absorption of the two most promising Fe-OA preparations against the standard-of-care therapy (namely ferrous sulphate). Following this iterative-based study we had a candidate Fe-OA preparation that showed nearly equivalent bioavailability to ferrous sulphate and we decided to stop the study at the end of Part A.

On day 1 of the study (Part A), the participants were given one methyl-cellulose capsule containing one of the Fe-OA preparations to be taken on an empty stomach or with a light breakfast consisting of water and 2 slices of white bread with jam. Participants were blinded to which test preparation they received. Serial serum iron levels were obtained at baseline and then 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 210 and 240 minutes after ingestion of the iron dosage. Fourteen days later the participants returned for the second study visit where they ingested one ferrous sulphate tablet with a light breakfast, and the same visit protocol was followed. Each subject acted as her own control.

The bioavailability of iron from the Fe-OA preparations was determined by measuring erythrocyte incorporation of labelled iron 14 days following a single oral dose. Each Fe-OA preparation was labelled with 2 mg of the stable isotope 58Fe per single dose of the Fe-OA material. Ferrous sulphate was used as a reference for oral iron therapy and to determine individuals who were non-iron absorbers. Non-iron absorbers were defined as those who had no significant net area under the curve (AUC) for serum iron following ferrous sulphate oral ingestion (i.e. this was defined as a serum iron increase ≤ 5 μM). The data obtained for these individuals were excluded from the final analysis.

The bioavailability of ferrous sulphate was determined using short-term changes in serum iron levels using published algorithms.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

71

Phase

  • Early Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Cambridgeshire
      • Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom, CB1 9NL
        • MRC Human Nutrition Research

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 45 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Female aged 18-45 years.

Low iron stores based on one of the following criteria:

(I) Mild iron deficiency anaemia defined as haemoglobin between 10-11.9 g/dL plus either a serum ferritin less than 20 μg/L or transferrin saturation < 10% or (II) iron deficiency defined as a serum ferritin less than 12 μg/L.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pregnancy and lactation
  • surgery in the past three months
  • cancer in last ten years
  • known chronic infection
  • chronic inflammation
  • moderate or severe anaemia
  • known cardiovascular disease
  • chronic respiratory disease.
  • history of hereditary haemochromatosis or haemoglobinopathies
  • current proton pump inhibitor medication
  • blood donation/heavy blood loss in the last 3 months
  • iron supplementation in the past 1 month
  • chronic liver disease
  • renal disease
  • Coeliac Disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Ferrous Sulphate
The active comparator was the standard-of-care therapy for iron deficiency anaemia (namely ferrous sulphate). Generic uncoated ferrous sulphate tablets BP 300 mg containing 60mg elemental iron were purchased from a local pharmacy. The route of administration was oral. Each participant ingested one ferrous sulphate tablet (60 mg Fe) on one of the study visits.
Experimental: ferric iron oxide-organic acid (Fe-OA)
Fifteen different ferric iron oxide-organic acid preparations were investigated. Most organic acids used were generally recognised as safe (GRAS) and all were used at dietary equivalent levels. The dosage was 58 ± 6 mg elemental iron equivalent (average of all compounds). The route of administration was oral using methyl-cellulose capsules. On one of the study visits, each participant ingested a single dose, equivalent to ca. 60 mg iron, of the Fe-OA preparation allocated to her.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Iron Bioavailability
Time Frame: 14 days
The primary outcome was bioavailability of iron from ferric iron oxide-organic acid preparations (Fe-OA) as measured by erythrocyte incorporation of labelled iron (58Fe).
14 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Iron absorption
Time Frame: 4 hours
The secondary outcomes were total iron absorption and the rates of iron absorption in the 4 hours following the ingestion of the ferric iron oxide-organic acid preparations (Fe-OA)and the active comparator (namely ferrous sulphate).
4 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Jonathan Powell, PhD, Medical Research Council

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 18, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 18, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

November 25, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 25, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 18, 2013

Last Verified

November 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Iron Deficiency Anaemia

Clinical Trials on ferrous sulphate

3
Subscribe