Health Economics of the Use of Ferrous Iron Salts in Primary Care in the UK.

March 20, 2018 updated by: dora pereira

Iron deficiency anaemia (IDA) affects approximately 4.7 million of people in the UK, with children and pre-menopausal women being at higher risk (1). Each year more than 6.8 million prescriptions for oral iron are filled in England alone (NHS Information Centre data). However, gastrointestinal symptoms limit adherence in 10-30% of otherwise healthy patients (2-4) and in up to 50% of patients with gastrointestinal disorders (5). Simple ferrous iron salts constitute the vast majority of currently prescribed oral iron because these are cheap and well absorbed. However, they are also poorly tolerated and thus, we believe, are expensive to the NHS.

Funded by the Medical Research Council, we have developed an alternative oral iron supplement, that we name IHAT (iron hydroxide adipate tartrate), as an efficacious therapy for IDA with minimal side-effects.

In the study proposed here we aim to assess the total health cost associated with current oral iron supplements and, hence, define the clinical unmet need for alternative treatments. We will use Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) GOLD data to (i) estimate the pattern of prescribing to oral iron in primary care in the general population and (ii) develop a health economics model in pre-menopausal women. These data will provide evidence for the total health system costs associated with current oral iron treatment. Furthermore, this study will provide data from which the cost-effectiveness and total health system costs of alternative effective and treatments with minimal side-effects could be estimated.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Our research objective is to gather evidence for the unmet clinical need for safe, low-side-effect oral iron in the UK.

To achieve this objective we aim to determine:

  1. Pattern of prescribing to oral iron in primary care in GP practices in England: estimate prescription rates, efficacy and intolerance of treatment with all forms of currently prescribed oral iron.
  2. Health economics of the use of ferrous iron salts in primary care: estimate patterns of individual response to treatment; determine the costs of ferrous iron (sulphate, fumarate and gluconate) therapy in pre-menopausal women in primary care, and develop a cost-effectiveness model for alternative treatments with minimal side-effects.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

406902

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Cambridgeshire
      • Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom, CB1 9NL
        • MRC Human Nutrition Research

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

For the 1-year cohort study we are not defining a sub-population group and will investigate all individuals (adults and children) prescribed any type of oral iron at least once in the time period assessed, although a breakdown by key sociodemographic (age, gender, ethnicity) will be conducted.

For the 10-year plus cohort study, pre-menopausal women in receipt of ferrous iron supplements are our study population of interest.

Pre-menopausal women are the population group with the largest number of individuals affected (nearly 2M) by IDA in the UK, mainly because dietary iron intake does not sufficiently offset menorrhagic iron losses.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients prescribed oral iron in primary care practices included in the UK CPRD database

Exclusion Criteria:

  • N/A

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
1-year cohort

Patients with at least 1 prescription of any oral iron preparation in the last 2 years and who have at least 1 year of follow up data post-prescription.

It is anticipated that ca. 123,000 patients in CPRD fulfil this criteria.

BNF code for section 9.1.1.1 (Oral iron preparations for iron-deficiency anaemias)
Other Names:
  • Dried ferrous sulphate tablets 200mg
  • Ferrous fumarate tablets 210mg
  • Ferrous gluconate tablets 300mg
  • Ferrous fumarate tablets 322mg (incl. Fersaday)
  • Ferrous fumarate capsules 305mg (incl. Galfer)
  • Dried ferrous sulphate MR tab 325mg (incl. Ferrograd)
10-year cohort

All pre-menopausal women (18-45 years old) with at least 1 prescription of one ferrous iron salt (i.e. sulphate, fumarate and gluconate) since January 2000.

It is anticipated that ca. 299,000 patients in CPRD fulfil this criteria.

BNF code for section 9.1.1.1 (Oral iron preparations for iron-deficiency anaemias)
Other Names:
  • Dried ferrous sulphate tablets 200mg
  • Ferrous fumarate tablets 210mg
  • Ferrous gluconate tablets 300mg
  • Ferrous fumarate tablets 322mg (incl. Fersaday)
  • Ferrous fumarate capsules 305mg (incl. Galfer)
  • Dried ferrous sulphate MR tab 325mg (incl. Ferrograd)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Prescription rate
Time Frame: 12 months
number of prescriptions of iron supplements issued at the patient level in the year
12 months
Health Economics Modelling
Time Frame: 10 years

In this analysis we will determine the following to parameterise the model that will be based on the cohort study over a 10 years period:

i) Frequency of repeat oral iron prescriptions, ii) Number of hospital admissions, i) Incidence of gastrointestinal side-effects, ii) Treatment cessation rate iii) Haemoglobin changes

The basis for the model will be the above data extracted from the CPRD, further informed by publicly available clinical trial data.

10 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Efficacy
Time Frame: 12 months
increase in Hb of at least 2 g/dL or to >12 g/dL
12 months
Gastrointestinal intolerance
Time Frame: 12 months
At least one event of i. change in product; ii. reduction in dose; iii cessation of treatment with no improvement in Hb during the 12 months
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Dora Pereira, PhD, MRC Human Nutrition Research

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 24, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 24, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

November 25, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 21, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 20, 2018

Last Verified

March 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anemia

Clinical Trials on oral iron

3
Subscribe