Comparison of Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) With Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy (LHM) for Treatment of Achalasia (POEM3)

June 5, 2019 updated by: Prof. Dr. Thomas Rösch, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf

Comparison of Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) With Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy (LHM) for Treatment of Achalasia, a Retrospective Multicenter Study

For the treatment of Achalasia, LHM has been the only surgical therapy. Recently, an endoscopic approach for this therapy has been developed (peroral endoscopic Myotomy POEM). Studies show promising short and mid term results for POEM. At present, POEM is considered a promising new technique with the potential to become a standard achalasia treatment. For this to happen, long-term comparative data with LHM is required. Therefore,the intention for this study is to investigate the short and long-term efficacy of POEM for the treatment of achalasia as it was performed in international centers and compare outcomes with database assessment of LHM.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Achalasia is a neurodegenerative esophageal motility disorder characterized by incomplete lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation, increased LES tone, and aperistalsis of the esophagus. The standard surgical treatment for achalasia is laparoscopic Heller Myotomy (LHM). A recent meta-analysis of 105 studies reporting on 7855 patients demonstrated that laparoscopic Heller myotomy is the most effective and long-lasting therapy for achalasia. Superior to Endoscopic balloon dilatation or Botulinumtoxin injection LHM has a one year therapeutic efficacy in approximately 90% of patients. Recently an endoscopic technique emulating the principles of LHM was developed. This technique of a purely endoscopic myotomy has been demonstrated by Pasricha et al. in animal experiments and Inoue et al. reported the first clinical study. Other pilot studies and a larger international multi-center trial have replicated promising results for POEM.

Uncontrolled studies show promising short and mid term results for POEM. At present, POEM is considered a promising new technique with the potential to become a standard achalasia treatment. For this to happen, however, comparative data with LHM is required. Our study group intends to investigate the short and long-term efficacy of POEM for the treatment of achalasia as it was performed in international centers and compare outcomes with database assessment of LHM.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

47

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Aarhus, Denmark, 0708
        • Aarhus University Hospital
      • Hamburg, Germany, 20246
        • University Hospital Eppendorf
      • Mainz, Germany, 55131
        • University Medical Center
      • Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1105
        • Academic Medical Center
      • Zürich, Switzerland, 8006
        • University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Achalasia patients who have been treated with either POEM or LHM

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with symptomatic achalasia and pre-op barium swallow, manometry and oesophago-gastro-duodenoscopy which have been consistent with the diagnosis
  • Age > 18 years with medical indication for interventional achalasia treatment
  • Availability of Eckardt score at baseline and 12 months after initial treatment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with previous surgery of the stomach or esophagus
  • Patients with known coagulopathy
  • Previous surgical achalasia treatment
  • Patients with liver cirrhosis and/or esophageal varices
  • Active esophagitis
  • Eosinophilic esophagitis
  • Barrett's esophagus
  • Stricture of the esophagus
  • Malignant or premalignant esophageal lesion
  • Severe Candida esophagitis
  • Hiatal hernia > 1cm
  • Extensive, tortuous dilatation (>7cm luminal diameter, S shape) of the esophagus

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
POEM
group of Achalasia patients treated with POEM (peroral endoscopic myotomy)
LHM
group of Achalasia patients treated with LHM (laparoscopic Heller myotomy)(+ fundoplication)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
treatment success
Time Frame: 1 year after treatment
treatment success is defined as an Eckardt Score </=3
1 year after treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
procedure related adverse events
Time Frame: 3 months after treatment
retrospective data for this timepoint can be used of the interval 2-8 months after the initial procedure
3 months after treatment
lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LESP)
Time Frame: 3 months after treatment
retrospective data for this timepoint can be used of the interval 2-8 months after the initial procedure
3 months after treatment
symptomatic reflux and use of antacid medication
Time Frame: 3 months after treatment
retrospective data for this timepoint can be used of the interval 2-8 months after the initial procedure
3 months after treatment
procedure related adverse events
Time Frame: 12 months after treatment
retrospective data for this timepoint can be used of the interval 9-15 months after the initial procedure
12 months after treatment
lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LESP)
Time Frame: 12 months after treatment
retrospective data for this timepoint can be used of the interval 9-15 months after the initial procedure
12 months after treatment
symptomatic reflux and use of antacid medication
Time Frame: 12 months after treatment
retrospective data for this timepoint can be used of the interval 9-15 months after the initial procedure
12 months after treatment

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
any reported GERD data
Time Frame: procedure to five years after treatment
procedure to five years after treatment
duration of procedure
Time Frame: procedure
duration of procedure (minutes)
procedure
in-hospital stay
Time Frame: procedure
in-hospital stay of patients (days)
procedure
length of myotomy
Time Frame: procedure
length of myotomy (centimeters)
procedure
procedure related complications
Time Frame: procedure
any complication during performance of treatment that required conversion to either laparoscopic (POEM) or open surgical treatment
procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 17, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 17, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

December 23, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 7, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 5, 2019

Last Verified

June 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PV4519
  • Ethics Committee, Hamburg (Registry Identifier: PV 4519)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

3
Subscribe