Efficacy, Tolerability and Impact on Quality of Life of Propiverine in Patients With Overactive Bladder Syndrome

December 28, 2013 updated by: Takeda

Evaluation of Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Overactive Bladder Syndrome (OAB) Treated With Propiverine, and Its Efficacy and Tolerance in Daily Practice in Belgian General Practitioners and Urologists

The purposes of this study were to assess Quality of Life (QoL) and urination urge, incontinence, and micturition frequency including nocturia after 4 and 12 weeks treatment with propiverine.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The drug being tested in this study is called propiverine. Propiverine is being tested to evaluate Quality of Life (QoL) and improvement of OAB symptoms in people who take propiverine. The study will enroll approximately 1000 patients who the treating physician decided to treat with propiverine 15mg tablets or 30 mg regulated release capsules as part of their normal clinical practice. All participants will be asked to keep a voiding diary for 2 consecutive days and to complete a QoL questionnaire after 1st visit and before each subsequent visit. This multi-centre trial will be conducted in Belgium. The overall time to participate in this study is up to 12 weeks. Participants will make 3 visits to their healthcare provider.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

437

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with OAB symptoms, who the treating physician decided to treat with propiverine, were to be included by General Practitioners (GP) and urologists in private practice in Belgium.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 1. Written informed consent. 2. At least 18 years of age. 3. Patients with complaints of Overactive Bladder Syndrome (OAB) without urge incontinence, OAB with urge incontinence, or with mixed urinary incontinence. 4. Patients who consult their GP or an urologist for the first time with these complaints or who stopped their OAB treatment since at least one month. 5. Receiving a propiverine prescription according to the Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • None, as per the SPC contra-indications

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Propiverine
Participants with symptoms of OAB, prescribed propiverine in accordance with the summary of product characteristics (SPC).
Propiverine 15 mg tablets or 30 mg regulated release capsules
Other Names:
  • Mictonorm®
  • Mictonorm Uno®

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL) as assessed by the King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) at Weeks 4 and 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 4 and 12
The King's Health Questionnaire is a condition-specific health-related QoL instrument for the assessment of patients with lower urinary tract conditions including overactive bladder. It is a self-administered questionnaire containing 21 questions scored in 9 domains (general health perception, incontinence impact, role limitations, physical limitations, social limitations, personal relationships, emotions, sleep or energy, and severity of urinary symptoms). All domains were assessed in a range: 0-100, where 0=best and 100=worst outcome. Lower scores indicates better QoL.
Baseline, Weeks 4 and 12
Change from Baseline in Urination Urge at Weeks 4 and 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 4 and 12
Each participant kept a voiding diary and recorded urinary urgency. The diary was kept for 2 consecutive days within 7 days of the Baseline visit, and 2 consecutive days just before the Week 4 and 12 visits. The average urination urge was then calculated.
Baseline, Weeks 4 and 12
Change from Baseline in Incontinence episodes at Weeks 4 and 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 4 and 12
Each patient kept a voiding diary and episodes of incontinence. The diary was kept for 2 consecutive days within 7 days of the Baseline visit, and 2 consecutive days just before the Week 4 and 12 visits. The average number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours was calculated.
Baseline, Weeks 4 and 12
Change from Baseline in Micturition Frequency including nocturia at Weeks 4 and 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 4 and 12
Each patient kept a voiding diary and recorded the number of micturitions. The diary was kept for 2 consecutive days within 7 days of the Baseline visit, and 2 consecutive days just before the Week 4 and 12 visits. The average number of micturitions and nocturia episodes per 24 hours was calculated.
Baseline, Weeks 4 and 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline in Urine Volume per Void at Weeks 4 and 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 4 and 12
Mean volume per void (or amount of urine per urination) over 24 hours is based on a 2-day diary maintained by the participant.
Baseline, Weeks 4 and 12
Patient and Investigator Assessment of Efficacy of Propiverine at Weeks 4 and 12
Time Frame: Weeks 4 and 12
Evaluation of efficacy was assessed by participants and investigators on a 4 point scale. Participants and investigators reported efficacy as very good, good, sufficient, or insufficient.
Weeks 4 and 12
Patient and Investigator Assessment of Tolerability of Propiverine at Weeks 4 and 12
Time Frame: 12 Weeks
Evaluation of tolerability was assessed by participants and investigators on a 4 point scale. Participants and investigators reported tolerability as very good, good, sufficient, or insufficient.
12 Weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 28, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 28, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

December 31, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 31, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 28, 2013

Last Verified

December 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Overactive Bladder Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Propiverine

Subscribe