- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02029521
Supplementation of Oral Reduced Glutathione in Pediatric Cystic Fibrosis Patients
Supplementation of Oral Reduced Glutathione in Pediatric Cystic Fibrosis for Growth Failure
Many individuals with cystic fibrosis experience growth failure. The reasons are not clear, but inflammation of the gut in these patients seems to be one important reason. Glutathione is important to normal function of the intestine and lungs. Glutathione functions to decrease inflammation and to thin mucus. However, in cystic fibrosis, glutathione gets trapped inside of cells, so it cannot travel to the surface of the cells and perform its proper function. Moreover, glutathione has been shown to improve nutritional status in patients with AIDS and cancer.
Investigators hypothesize that supplementation of oral glutathione to pediatric individuals with cystic fibrosis could improve growth failure.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Cystic fibrosis (CF) is known principally for its pulmonary consequences. However, for most individuals with CF, the earliest manifestations are not pulmonary, but gastro-intestinal. Many children experience growth failure. Chronic gut inflammation also develops. Research has also established that lung function scores are significantly correlated with Body Mass Index (BMI) and weight percentile in CF. Therefore, interventions to improve the gastro-intestinal dimension of CF in early childhood have the potential to ameliorate the course of the disease over the life span of the patient. Both Cochrane Database reviews and a recent review commissioned by the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation found only fair evidence for current nutritional guidelines.Therefore, there is a pressing need for a treatment for CF growth failure that is more effective and less invasive than current treatments.
The discovery that CF is associated with significantly diminished efflux of reduced glutathione (GSH) from most cells in the body offers a new perspective on the pathophysiology of this disease. GSH plays several important roles; among the most important are the following: 1) primary water-soluble antioxidant; 2) mucolytic capable of cleaving disulfide bonds; and 3) regulator of immune system function. The relationship between redox ratio (GSH:GSSG) and total glutathione (GSH+GSSG) and the initiation of inflammation is well established in the research literature.
GSH is also an important component of the epithelial lining fluid of the intestines, helping to keep intestinal mucus thin, serving to defend the intestinal system against reactive oxygen species, and keeping inflammation in check under normal circumstances. GSH is an FDA-approved treatment for AIDS-related cachexia. The growing recognition of GSH system dysfunction in CF, coupled with an established research literature on the role of GSH in gastro-intestinal function and weight gain in non-CF contexts, suggest a new intervention for growth failure in early childhood in CF patients. Specifically, investigators hypothesized that oral glutathione could effectively treat CF growth failure in pediatric patients.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Turin, Italy
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
-Diagnosis of Cystic Fibrosis by either of the following criteria: >60 sweat chloride test or paired deleterious DNA cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) mutations (Ambry genetics, Genetech or ARUP);
-Pancreatic insufficient as defined by doctor's prescription of pancreatic enzymes.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Hospitalized for bowel obstruction or surgery in the six months prior to enrollment;
- had had a pulmonary exacerbation or oral steroid use or IV antibiotics within one month of enrollment,
- who had been taking either GSH or N-acetyl cysteine (NAC) within the 12 month period immediately prior to the trial,
- chronically infected with Burkholderia cepacia.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: QUADRUPLE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
EXPERIMENTAL: Oral reduced l-glutathione
The treatment was pharmaceutical-grade Reduced L-Glutathione (GSH) with a daily dose of 65 mg/kg.
|
The treatment was pharmaceutical-grade Reduced L-Glutathione (GSH) with a daily dose of 65 mg/kg.
The placebo was calcium citrate with a daily dose of 65 mg/kg.
The daily dose of each substance was divided into three doses given at mealtime.
|
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Placebo Calcium Citrate
The placebo was calcium citrate with a daily dose of 65 mg/kg.
The daily dose of each substance was divided into three doses given at mealtime.
|
calcium citrate with a daily dose of 65 mg/kg.
The daily dose of each substance was divided into three doses given at mealtime.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Weight Percentile at 3 Months
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Weight Percentile at 3 months adjusted for sex and age
|
3 months
|
Height Percentile
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Height Percentile adjusted for sex and age
|
3 months
|
BMI Percentile
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Body Mass Index percentile adjusted for sex and age.
Standard BMI are not available for participants under 2 years of age
|
3 months
|
BMI Percentile
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Body Mass Index percentile adjusted for sex and age.
Not available for participants under 2 years of age.
|
6 months
|
Weight Percentile
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Weight percentile, adjusted for sex and age
|
6 months
|
Height Percentile
Time Frame: 6 Months
|
The subjects were measured over the course of the study to determine if treatment improved height percentile.
|
6 Months
|
Fecal Calprotectin
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Fecal Calprotectin, a measure of gut inflammation, was measured to see if the treatment decreased this outcome.
|
6 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Forced Vital Capacity
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Forced vital capacity percent predicted
|
3 months
|
FEV1
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Forced expiratory volume at one second, percent predicted
|
3 months
|
Bacteriology
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Expectorated sputum or throat swab
|
3 months
|
Forced Vital Capacity
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Percent predicted of forced vital capacity.
|
6 months
|
FEV1
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Forced expiratory volume at one second, percent predicted.
|
6 months
|
C-Reactive Protein (CRP)
Time Frame: 6 months
|
CRP was measured to determine if this test fell during the course of treatment.
|
6 months
|
White Blood Cell Count
Time Frame: 6 months
|
White blood cell count was measure at the beginning and end of the study to determine if treatment affected this test.
|
6 months
|
Vitamin E
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Serum Vitamin E levels were measured to determine if treatment affected this test.
|
6 months
|
Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT)
Time Frame: 6 Months
|
ALT was measured to determine if liver function was affected by treatment over the course of the study.
|
6 Months
|
Bacteriology
Time Frame: 6 Months
|
Expectorated sputum or throat swab
|
6 Months
|
Frequency of Abdominal Pain
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Part of the Qualitative Symptom Assessment; scaled from 1-4 with 4 being the most frequent
|
6 months
|
Severity of Abdominal Pain
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Part of the Qualitative Symptom Assessment; scaled from 1-4 with 4 being the most severe
|
6 months
|
Frequency of Belching
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Part of the Qualitative Symptom Assessment; scaled from 1-4 with 4 being the most frequent
|
6 months
|
Severity of Belching
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Part of the Qualitative Symptom Assessment; scaled from 1-4 with 4 being the most severe
|
6 months
|
Frequency of Flatulence
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Part of the Qualitative Symptom Assessment; scaled from 1-4 with 4 being the most frequent
|
6 months
|
Severity of Flatulence
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Part of the Qualitative Symptom Assessment; scaled from 1-4 with 4 being the most severe
|
6 months
|
Frequency of Lack of Appetite
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Part of the Qualitative Symptom Assessment; scaled from 1-4 with 4 being the most frequent
|
6 months
|
Severity of Lack of Appetite
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Part of the Qualitative Symptom Assessment; scaled from 1-4 with 4 being the most severe
|
6 months
|
Frequency of Bloating
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Part of the Qualitative Symptom Assessment; scaled from 1-4 with 4 being the most frequent
|
6 months
|
Severity of Bloating
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Part of the Qualitative Symptom Assessment; scaled from 1-4 with 4 being the most severe
|
6 months
|
Frequency of Nausea
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Part of the Qualitative Symptom Assessment; scaled from 1-4 with 4 being the most frequent
|
6 months
|
Severity of Nausea
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Part of the Qualitative Symptom Assessment; scaled from 1-4 with 4 being the most severe
|
6 months
|
Frequency of Vomiting
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Part of the Qualitative Symptom Assessment; scaled from 1-4 with 4 being the most frequent
|
6 months
|
Severity of Vomiting
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Part of the Qualitative Symptom Assessment; scaled from 1-4 with 4 being the most severe
|
6 months
|
Frequency of Heart Burn
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Part of the Qualitative Symptom Assessment; scaled from 1-4 with 4 being the most frequent
|
6 months
|
Severity of Heart Burn
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Part of the Qualitative Symptom Assessment; scaled from 1-4 with 4 being the most severe
|
6 months
|
Frequency of Diarrhea
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Part of the Qualitative Symptom Assessment; scaled from 1-4 with 4 being the most frequent
|
6 months
|
Severity of Diarrhea
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Part of the Qualitative Symptom Assessment; scaled from 1-4 with 4 being the most severe
|
6 months
|
Frequency of More Than 2 Bowel Movements Per Day
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Part of the Qualitative Symptom Assessment; scaled from 1-4 with 4 being the most frequent
|
6 months
|
Severity of More Than 2 Bowel Movements Per Day
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Part of the Qualitative Symptom Assessment; scaled from 1-4 with 4 being the most severe
|
6 months
|
Frequency of Less Than 2 Bowel Movements Per Week
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Part of the Qualitative Symptom Assessment; scaled from 1-4 with 4 being the most frequent
|
6 months
|
Severity of Less Than 2 Bowel Movements Per Week
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Part of the Qualitative Symptom Assessment; scaled from 1-4 with 4 being the most severe
|
6 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: Clark T Bishop, MD, Intermountain Health Care
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- FIMP/clin.stud/2010/1.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Cystic Fibrosis
-
Hospital de Clinicas de Porto AlegreUnknownCystic Fibrosis | Cystic Fibrosis Pulmonary Exacerbation | Cystic Fibrosis in Children | Cystic Fibrosis With ExacerbationBrazil
-
University of Colorado, DenverCystic Fibrosis FoundationTerminatedCystic Fibrosis-related Diabetes | Cystic Fibrosis Pulmonary Exacerbation | Cystic Fibrosis in ChildrenUnited States
-
Royal College of Surgeons, IrelandThe Hospital for Sick Children; Imperial College London; Erasmus Medical Center; University College Dublin and other collaboratorsActive, not recruitingCystic Fibrosis | Adherence, Medication | Cystic Fibrosis Gastrointestinal Disease | Cystic Fibrosis in Children | Cystic Fibrosis Liver DiseaseUnited Kingdom, Ireland
-
Herlev and Gentofte HospitalCopenhagen University Hospital, DenmarkActive, not recruitingMyocardial Infarction | Heart Diseases | Heart Failure | Stroke | Cystic Fibrosis | Heart Failure, Diastolic | Heart Failure, Systolic | Left Ventricular Dysfunction | Cystic Fibrosis-related Diabetes | Cystic Fibrosis Gastrointestinal Disease | Cystic Fibrosis of Pancreas | Cystic Fibrosis, Pulmonary | Cystic...Denmark
-
The Hospital for Sick ChildrenCanadian Cystic Fibrosis FoundationActive, not recruitingCystic Fibrosis | Cystic Fibrosis Gastrointestinal Disease | Cystic Fibrosis in ChildrenCanada
-
Arrowhead PharmaceuticalsTerminatedCystic Fibrosis, PulmonaryAustralia, New Zealand
-
AzurRx SASCompletedCystic Fibrosis | Cystic Fibrosis Gastrointestinal Disease | Cystic Fibrosis of PancreasTurkey, Hungary
-
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical CenterTrustees of Dartmouth CollegeWithdrawnCystic Fibrosis-related Diabetes | Cystic Fibrosis Liver Disease | CF - Cystic FibrosisUnited States
-
University Hospital, BordeauxCompleted
-
University of PortsmouthUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust; Loughborough University; Queen Alexandra HospitalTerminated
Clinical Trials on Oral reduced l-glutathione
-
University of North Texas, Denton, TXKirin Holdings Company, LimitedCompleted
-
Dr Irma Bernadette S SitohangCompleted
-
Bastyr UniversityMichael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's ResearchCompletedParkinson's DiseaseUnited States
-
Nathalie JohnsonCompleted
-
University of WashingtonMichael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's ResearchCompleted
-
Abant Izzet Baysal UniversityCompleted
-
Texas Tech UniversityKyowa Hakko Bio Co., Ltd.CompletedMenopause | Cardiovascular Risk FactorUnited States
-
Milton S. Hershey Medical CenterCompleted
-
University of MichiganPenn State UniversityCompletedDepression | Pain | Physical Activity | Sleep Disorders | Post-polio SyndromeUnited States
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillKirin Holdings Company, LimitedCompleted