Supplementation of Oral Reduced Glutathione in Pediatric Cystic Fibrosis Patients

January 16, 2016 updated by: Clark Bishop

Supplementation of Oral Reduced Glutathione in Pediatric Cystic Fibrosis for Growth Failure

Many individuals with cystic fibrosis experience growth failure. The reasons are not clear, but inflammation of the gut in these patients seems to be one important reason. Glutathione is important to normal function of the intestine and lungs. Glutathione functions to decrease inflammation and to thin mucus. However, in cystic fibrosis, glutathione gets trapped inside of cells, so it cannot travel to the surface of the cells and perform its proper function. Moreover, glutathione has been shown to improve nutritional status in patients with AIDS and cancer.

Investigators hypothesize that supplementation of oral glutathione to pediatric individuals with cystic fibrosis could improve growth failure.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is known principally for its pulmonary consequences. However, for most individuals with CF, the earliest manifestations are not pulmonary, but gastro-intestinal. Many children experience growth failure. Chronic gut inflammation also develops. Research has also established that lung function scores are significantly correlated with Body Mass Index (BMI) and weight percentile in CF. Therefore, interventions to improve the gastro-intestinal dimension of CF in early childhood have the potential to ameliorate the course of the disease over the life span of the patient. Both Cochrane Database reviews and a recent review commissioned by the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation found only fair evidence for current nutritional guidelines.Therefore, there is a pressing need for a treatment for CF growth failure that is more effective and less invasive than current treatments.

The discovery that CF is associated with significantly diminished efflux of reduced glutathione (GSH) from most cells in the body offers a new perspective on the pathophysiology of this disease. GSH plays several important roles; among the most important are the following: 1) primary water-soluble antioxidant; 2) mucolytic capable of cleaving disulfide bonds; and 3) regulator of immune system function. The relationship between redox ratio (GSH:GSSG) and total glutathione (GSH+GSSG) and the initiation of inflammation is well established in the research literature.

GSH is also an important component of the epithelial lining fluid of the intestines, helping to keep intestinal mucus thin, serving to defend the intestinal system against reactive oxygen species, and keeping inflammation in check under normal circumstances. GSH is an FDA-approved treatment for AIDS-related cachexia. The growing recognition of GSH system dysfunction in CF, coupled with an established research literature on the role of GSH in gastro-intestinal function and weight gain in non-CF contexts, suggest a new intervention for growth failure in early childhood in CF patients. Specifically, investigators hypothesized that oral glutathione could effectively treat CF growth failure in pediatric patients.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

47

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 year to 10 years (CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

-Diagnosis of Cystic Fibrosis by either of the following criteria: >60 sweat chloride test or paired deleterious DNA cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) mutations (Ambry genetics, Genetech or ARUP);

-Pancreatic insufficient as defined by doctor's prescription of pancreatic enzymes.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hospitalized for bowel obstruction or surgery in the six months prior to enrollment;
  • had had a pulmonary exacerbation or oral steroid use or IV antibiotics within one month of enrollment,
  • who had been taking either GSH or N-acetyl cysteine (NAC) within the 12 month period immediately prior to the trial,
  • chronically infected with Burkholderia cepacia.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: QUADRUPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Oral reduced l-glutathione
The treatment was pharmaceutical-grade Reduced L-Glutathione (GSH) with a daily dose of 65 mg/kg.
The treatment was pharmaceutical-grade Reduced L-Glutathione (GSH) with a daily dose of 65 mg/kg. The placebo was calcium citrate with a daily dose of 65 mg/kg. The daily dose of each substance was divided into three doses given at mealtime.
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Placebo Calcium Citrate
The placebo was calcium citrate with a daily dose of 65 mg/kg. The daily dose of each substance was divided into three doses given at mealtime.
calcium citrate with a daily dose of 65 mg/kg. The daily dose of each substance was divided into three doses given at mealtime.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Weight Percentile at 3 Months
Time Frame: 3 months
Weight Percentile at 3 months adjusted for sex and age
3 months
Height Percentile
Time Frame: 3 months
Height Percentile adjusted for sex and age
3 months
BMI Percentile
Time Frame: 3 months
Body Mass Index percentile adjusted for sex and age. Standard BMI are not available for participants under 2 years of age
3 months
BMI Percentile
Time Frame: 6 months
Body Mass Index percentile adjusted for sex and age. Not available for participants under 2 years of age.
6 months
Weight Percentile
Time Frame: 6 months
Weight percentile, adjusted for sex and age
6 months
Height Percentile
Time Frame: 6 Months
The subjects were measured over the course of the study to determine if treatment improved height percentile.
6 Months
Fecal Calprotectin
Time Frame: 6 months
Fecal Calprotectin, a measure of gut inflammation, was measured to see if the treatment decreased this outcome.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Forced Vital Capacity
Time Frame: 3 months
Forced vital capacity percent predicted
3 months
FEV1
Time Frame: 3 months
Forced expiratory volume at one second, percent predicted
3 months
Bacteriology
Time Frame: 3 months
Expectorated sputum or throat swab
3 months
Forced Vital Capacity
Time Frame: 6 months
Percent predicted of forced vital capacity.
6 months
FEV1
Time Frame: 6 months
Forced expiratory volume at one second, percent predicted.
6 months
C-Reactive Protein (CRP)
Time Frame: 6 months
CRP was measured to determine if this test fell during the course of treatment.
6 months
White Blood Cell Count
Time Frame: 6 months
White blood cell count was measure at the beginning and end of the study to determine if treatment affected this test.
6 months
Vitamin E
Time Frame: 6 months
Serum Vitamin E levels were measured to determine if treatment affected this test.
6 months
Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT)
Time Frame: 6 Months
ALT was measured to determine if liver function was affected by treatment over the course of the study.
6 Months
Bacteriology
Time Frame: 6 Months
Expectorated sputum or throat swab
6 Months
Frequency of Abdominal Pain
Time Frame: 6 months
Part of the Qualitative Symptom Assessment; scaled from 1-4 with 4 being the most frequent
6 months
Severity of Abdominal Pain
Time Frame: 6 months
Part of the Qualitative Symptom Assessment; scaled from 1-4 with 4 being the most severe
6 months
Frequency of Belching
Time Frame: 6 months
Part of the Qualitative Symptom Assessment; scaled from 1-4 with 4 being the most frequent
6 months
Severity of Belching
Time Frame: 6 months
Part of the Qualitative Symptom Assessment; scaled from 1-4 with 4 being the most severe
6 months
Frequency of Flatulence
Time Frame: 6 months
Part of the Qualitative Symptom Assessment; scaled from 1-4 with 4 being the most frequent
6 months
Severity of Flatulence
Time Frame: 6 months
Part of the Qualitative Symptom Assessment; scaled from 1-4 with 4 being the most severe
6 months
Frequency of Lack of Appetite
Time Frame: 6 months
Part of the Qualitative Symptom Assessment; scaled from 1-4 with 4 being the most frequent
6 months
Severity of Lack of Appetite
Time Frame: 6 months
Part of the Qualitative Symptom Assessment; scaled from 1-4 with 4 being the most severe
6 months
Frequency of Bloating
Time Frame: 6 months
Part of the Qualitative Symptom Assessment; scaled from 1-4 with 4 being the most frequent
6 months
Severity of Bloating
Time Frame: 6 months
Part of the Qualitative Symptom Assessment; scaled from 1-4 with 4 being the most severe
6 months
Frequency of Nausea
Time Frame: 6 months
Part of the Qualitative Symptom Assessment; scaled from 1-4 with 4 being the most frequent
6 months
Severity of Nausea
Time Frame: 6 months
Part of the Qualitative Symptom Assessment; scaled from 1-4 with 4 being the most severe
6 months
Frequency of Vomiting
Time Frame: 6 months
Part of the Qualitative Symptom Assessment; scaled from 1-4 with 4 being the most frequent
6 months
Severity of Vomiting
Time Frame: 6 months
Part of the Qualitative Symptom Assessment; scaled from 1-4 with 4 being the most severe
6 months
Frequency of Heart Burn
Time Frame: 6 months
Part of the Qualitative Symptom Assessment; scaled from 1-4 with 4 being the most frequent
6 months
Severity of Heart Burn
Time Frame: 6 months
Part of the Qualitative Symptom Assessment; scaled from 1-4 with 4 being the most severe
6 months
Frequency of Diarrhea
Time Frame: 6 months
Part of the Qualitative Symptom Assessment; scaled from 1-4 with 4 being the most frequent
6 months
Severity of Diarrhea
Time Frame: 6 months
Part of the Qualitative Symptom Assessment; scaled from 1-4 with 4 being the most severe
6 months
Frequency of More Than 2 Bowel Movements Per Day
Time Frame: 6 months
Part of the Qualitative Symptom Assessment; scaled from 1-4 with 4 being the most frequent
6 months
Severity of More Than 2 Bowel Movements Per Day
Time Frame: 6 months
Part of the Qualitative Symptom Assessment; scaled from 1-4 with 4 being the most severe
6 months
Frequency of Less Than 2 Bowel Movements Per Week
Time Frame: 6 months
Part of the Qualitative Symptom Assessment; scaled from 1-4 with 4 being the most frequent
6 months
Severity of Less Than 2 Bowel Movements Per Week
Time Frame: 6 months
Part of the Qualitative Symptom Assessment; scaled from 1-4 with 4 being the most severe
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Clark T Bishop, MD, Intermountain Health Care

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2011

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

March 1, 2012

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

July 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 30, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 6, 2014

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

January 8, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

February 8, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 16, 2016

Last Verified

January 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cystic Fibrosis

Clinical Trials on Oral reduced l-glutathione

3
Subscribe