Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC) Regimen and Post-transplant Cyclophosphamide in Haploidentical Bone Marrow Transplantation in in Patients With Poor Prognosis Lymphomas

January 29, 2014 updated by: Istituto Clinico Humanitas

Multi-center, Phase II Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Haploidentical Bone Marrow Transplantation Using Reduced Intensity Conditioning(RIC)Regimen and Post-transplant Cyclophosphamide,in Patients With Poor Prognosis Lymphomas

Study to test feasibility and efficacy of T-replete Bone Marrow (BM), infused after a RIC regimen and post-transplantation Cyclophosphamide (Cy), in patients with poor prognosis lymphomas.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Detailed Description

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (ALLO) is the treatment of choice for many hematological diseases. However, HLA identical donor (sibling or unrelated) is available for 50-60% of patients and alternative donors are needed. Haploidentical donors have been used for many years, mostly after extensive T-cell depletion of peripheral stem cell, to avoid Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD). Recently, promising data have been reported with haploidentical transplantation using T-replete bone marrow (BM) and high-dose cyclophosphamide (Cy) post-transplantation. However, the conditioning regimen did not contain drugs active against hemopathies, enhancing the relapse risk.

In this study, the investigators want to test the feasibility and efficacy of T-replete BM, infused after a RIC regimen and post-transplantation Cy, in patients with poor prognosis lymphoproliferative diseases.

The RIC regimen consisted of modified regimen used in different studies conducted in Italy on behalf GITMO.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

47

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • MI
      • Rozzano, MI, Italy, 20089

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

  • Signed and dated IEC-approved informed consent
  • Age ≥ 18-70 years old.
  • Performance Status Karnofsky ≥ 80% (see appendix B)
  • HLA typing will be performed at high resolution (allele level) for the HLA-A, HLA -B, HLA Cw, HLA-DRB1, and HLA-DQB1 loci. A minimum match of 5/10 is required. An unrelated donor search is not required for a patient to be eligible for this protocol if the clinical situation dictates an urgent transplant.
  • The donor and recipient must be identical, as determined by high resolution typing, at least one allele of each of the following genetic loci: HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-Cw, HLA-DRB1, and HLA-DQB1.
  • Patients with lymphoma (any histology) relapsed after high dose chemotherapy and in partial remission, complete remission or stable disease after the last CT line.

    1. Hodgkin's lymphoma: Patients refractory to at least 2 CT lines, and included in tandem auto-allo program
    2. Diffuse large B cell lymphoma: Refractory to second line salvage chemotherapy (patients in partial remission, stable disease or progressive). These patients have to be in partial remission, complete remission or stable disease after one o more further CT line.
    3. Peripheral T cell lymphoma: Patients failing to achieve a complete remission after first line CT.
    4. Low grade lymphomas (follicular and non follicular: Patients refractory to rituximab containing regimens. Patients relapsing after at least 2 lines CT. The duration of remission should be < 1 year.
    5. Chronic lymphatic leukemia: Patients with refractory or relapsing (response duration < 1 year) disease after R-Fludarabine CT
    6. Mantle cell lymphoma: Patients relapsing or refractory after first line conventional CT.
  • Absence of HLA identical sibling and 10/10 unrelated donor
  • Patients with adequate physical function as measured by:

Cardiac: Left ventricular ejection fraction at rest must be ≥ 40% Hepatic: Bilirubin ≤ 2.5 mg/dL; and ALT, AST, and Alkaline Phosphatase ≤ 5 x ULN.

Renal: Creatinine clearance or GFR ≥ 50 mL/min/1.73 m2. Pulmonary: FEV1, FVC, DLCO ≥ 50% predicted (corrected for hemoglobin); if unable to perform pulmonary function tests, then O2 saturation ≥ 92% on room air.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of HLA-matched, related donor (HLA-A, -B, -DRB1)
  • Presence of matched unrelated donor (10/10), available on time.
  • Pregnancy or breast-feeding.
  • Evidence of HIV infection or known HIV positive serology.
  • Current uncontrolled bacterial, viral or fungal infection
  • Evidence of progression of clinical symptoms or radiologic findings.
  • Prior allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant.
  • Central Nervous System (CNS) lymphoma localization

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: RIC regimen
Thiotepa, Fludarabine, Cyclophosphamide pre- and post- transplantation.
Thiotepa (10 mg/kg /day) will be administered every 12 h, at day -6
Other Names:
  • Tepadina

Fludarabine (30mg/m2/day x 4 days) will be dosed according to renal function. For decreased creatinine clearance (CCr) (≤ 61 mL/min) Fludarabine dosage should be reduced as follows:

CCr 46-60 mL/min, fludarabine = 24 mg/ m2/day

Other Names:
  • Fludara

Pre-transplantation Cyclophosphamide(Cy) 30 mg/kg/day will be administered as a 1-2 hour intravenous infusion with a high volume fluid flush on Days -5.

Cy will be dosed according to the recipient's ideal body weight (IBW), unless the patient weighs more than 125% of IBW, in which case the drug will be dosed according to the Adjusted IBW (AIBW)

Cyclophosphamide [50 mg/kg/day IBW] will be given on Day 3 post-transplant (between 60 and 72 hours after marrow infusion) and on Day 4 post-transplant (approximately 24 hours after Day 3 cyclophosphamide). Cyclophosphamide will be given as an IV infusion over 1-2 hours (depending on volume).

Other Names:
  • Endoxan

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Procedure activity
Time Frame: 1 year
1-year Progression Free Survival (PFS) to evaluate the activity of the procedure (taking into account an excess of toxicity). It is assumed that at 1-year a proportion of patients progression free of 20% or lower will be considered to be clinically unworthy, whereas a proportion of 40% or higher will be assumed to be of potential interest.
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Neutrophils recovery
Time Frame: 1 year
Neutrophils will be measured at different time points of increasing lenght up to 1 year after transplant and then if clinically indicated
1 year
Platelets recovery
Time Frame: 1 year
Platelets will be measured at different time points of increasing lenght up to 1 year after transplant and then if clinically indicated
1 year
Incidence of graft failure
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
Cumulative incidence of acute and chronic GVHD
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
Incidence of infections
Time Frame: 1 year
Possible infections will be monitored for a time period of 1 year post-transplantation and then if clinically required
1 year
Cumulative incidence of relapse/progression
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
Treatment related mortality (TRM)
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
Immunological reconstitution
Time Frame: 1 year
T, B and NK subsets will be analysed in deep using cytofluorimetry and functional tests.
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2013

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

August 1, 2016

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

November 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 28, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 29, 2014

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

January 30, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

January 30, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 29, 2014

Last Verified

January 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lymphoma

Clinical Trials on Thiotepa

Subscribe