Pedunculopontine Nucleus Stimulation for Gait Disorders in Parkinson's Disease

February 3, 2014 updated by: David Grabli, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital

Effects of Low Frequency Deep Brain Stimulation of the Pedunculopontine Nucleus on Gait and Balance Disorders of Parkinson's Disease

The appearance of postural instability and gait disorders is a major turning point in the evolution of Parkinson's disease (PD). These axial symptoms are usually unresponsive to L-Dopa and represent a severe impairment for the patients due to frequent falls and reduced outside mobility. There is no effective pharmacological treatment available for these symptoms, and their pathophysiology is not well known : it is currently assumed that non-dopaminergic brainstem lesions participate to axial symptoms in PD. Surgically, these patients cannot benefit from high frequency deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) since this operation tends to even aggravate axial symptoms unresponsive to L-Dopa in some patients. A dysfunction of the pedunculopontine nucleus (PPN) might be at the origin of these axial symptoms, since the PPN participates in the maintenance of posture and motion in primates. In PD patients, recent reports have suggested that low frequency stimulation of the PPN may equally improve gait and posture. However, these results are debatable due to methodological limitations, insufficient clinical evaluation and uncertain anatomical targeting. Thus, our aim is to propose a low frequency PPN stimulation to six advanced PD patients according to the usual criteria for STN DBS who are, however, unsuitable for this operation due to gait and posture disorders. We will perform a randomized, double-blind and cross over design (two months periods with and without DBS randomly assigned to each patient). The targeting will be allowed by a a three-dimensional and deformable atlas of the basal ganglia fusioned with the stereotaxic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of each patient. Evaluations will comprise 1 month before surgery and in "Off" and "On" stimulation condition:

  • clinical motor assessment in both "Off" and "On" drug state, including cardinal parkinsonian signs, gait and balance
  • gait initiation physiological evaluation
  • cognitive and behavioral testing If our hypothesis is confirmed, low frequency PPN stimulation may well represent a substantial improvement of our therapeutic options for advanced PD patients suffering from debilitating gait and posture disorders unresponsive to L-Dopa.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

6

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Paris, France, 75013
        • Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Parkinson's disease
  • Age < 70 and > = 18 years
  • Improvement > or = 50 % during acute levodopa test
  • Score > or = 2 on item 29 of UPDRS part 3 score obtained in "off" drug state
  • No previous DBS
  • No evidence of atypical parkinsonism
  • No dementia (MATTIS > 129)
  • No psychiatric disease
  • Contraception if woman
  • Informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contra indication to surgery
  • Contra indication to MRI
  • Severe life threatening comorbidity

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: OFF PPN DBS-ON PPN DBS
Patients randomly allocated to the order OFF Low frequency DBS of the pedunculopontine nucleus then ON Low frequency DBS of the pedunculopontine nucleus
Other: ON PPN DBS - OFF PPN DBS
Patients randomly allocated to the order ON Low frequency DBS of the pedunculopontine nucleus then OFF Low frequency DBS of the pedunculopontine nucleus

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of Rating scale for gait evaluation between 'Off stim off drug" and "On stim off drug" conditions
Time Frame: 4 months and 6 months after surgery
The primary outcome criteria will be the comparison between RSGE total score in obtained 'Off' and 'On' stimulation conditions either at 4 or 6 months after surgery according to the randomized order of the cross-over
4 months and 6 months after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Adverse events records
Time Frame: 1 month before surgery, 1-2-3-4-5-6 months after surgery
1 month before surgery, 1-2-3-4-5-6 months after surgery
Change of UPDRS part 3 score between "Off Stim Off drug" and "ON stim Off drug" conditions
Time Frame: 4 and 6 months after surgery
4 and 6 months after surgery
Change of Rating scale for gait evaluation between 'Off stim on drug" and "On stim on drug" conditions
Time Frame: 4 and 6 months after surgery
4 and 6 months after surgery
Change of UPDRS part 3 score between "Off Stim On drug" and "ON stim On drug" conditions
Time Frame: 4 and 6 months after surgery
4 and 6 months after surgery
Change of UPDRS part 3 score between "Off Stim Off drug" and "No stim Off drug" conditions
Time Frame: 1 month before surgery and 4 or 6 months after surgery
1 month before surgery and 4 or 6 months after surgery
Change of UPDRS part 3 score between "Off Stim On drug" and "No stim On drug" conditions
Time Frame: 1 month before surgery and 4 or 6 months after surgery
1 month before surgery and 4 or 6 months after surgery
Change of Rating scale for gait evaluation between 'Off stim Off drug" and "No stim off drug" conditions
Time Frame: 1 month before surgery and 4 or 6 months after surgery
1 month before surgery and 4 or 6 months after surgery
Change of Rating scale for gait evaluation between 'Off stim On drug" and "No stim on drug" conditions
Time Frame: 1 month before surgery and 4 or 6 months after surgery
1 month before surgery and 4 or 6 months after surgery
Change of Rating scale for gait evaluation between 'On stim Off drug" and "No stim off drug" conditions
Time Frame: 1 month before surgery and 4 or 6 months after surgery
1 month before surgery and 4 or 6 months after surgery
Change of Rating scale for gait evaluation between 'On stim On drug" and "No stim On drug" conditions
Time Frame: 1 month before surgery and 4 or 6 months after surgery
1 month before surgery and 4 or 6 months after surgery
Change of gait physiological parameters between "Off Stim Off drug" and "ON stim Off drug" conditions
Time Frame: 4 and 6 months after surgery
4 and 6 months after surgery
Change of gait physiological parameters between "Off Stim On drug" and "ON stim On drug" conditions
Time Frame: 4 and 6 months after surgery
4 and 6 months after surgery
Change of gait physiological parameters between "No Stim On drug" and "Off stim On drug" conditions
Time Frame: 1 month before surgery and 4 or 6 months after surgery
1 month before surgery and 4 or 6 months after surgery
Change of gait physiological parameters between "No Stim Off drug" and "On stim off drug" conditions
Time Frame: 1 month before surgery and 4 or 6 months after surgery
1 month before surgery and 4 or 6 months after surgery
Change of gait physiological parameters between "No Stim Off drug" and "Off stim off drug" conditions
Time Frame: 1 month before surgery and 4 or 6 months after surgery
1 month before surgery and 4 or 6 months after surgery

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Changes in sleep architecture between "off stim" and "on stim" conditions
Time Frame: 4 and 6 months after surgery
4 and 6 months after surgery
changes in cognitive evaluation between "Off stim" and 'On stim" conditions
Time Frame: 4 and 6 months after surgery
4 and 6 months after surgery
changes in cognitive evaluation between "No stim" and 'Off stim" conditions
Time Frame: 1 month before surgery and 4 or 6 months after surgery
1 month before surgery and 4 or 6 months after surgery
changes in cognitive evaluation between "No stim" and 'On stim" conditions
Time Frame: 1 month before surgery and 4 or 6 months after surgery
1 month before surgery and 4 or 6 months after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 16, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 3, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

February 5, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 5, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 3, 2014

Last Verified

February 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson's Disease

Clinical Trials on Low frequency DBS of the pedunculopontine nucleus

Subscribe