- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02067663
Comparison of the Levonorgestrel IUD and the Copper IUD Placed in the Immediate Postplacental Period: A Prospective Cohort Study
The intrauterine device (IUD) is a safe, highly effective, long acting, and reversible form of contraception. The postpartum period is an important moment for contraceptive intervention; however there are many barriers to women obtaining birth control postpartum. The use of the IUD in the immediate postpartum setting offers many advantages and is considered safe, but the risk of expulsion appears to be higher than with interval insertion. Previous studies have shown the rate of expulsion of the copper IUD in the postplacental period to be in the range of 1-14% by 6-12 months, while the only study of the levonorgestrel IUD in the postplacental period documented a rate of expulsion of 24% by 12 months. While studies related to the copper IUD use ring forceps or the operator's hand for placement of the IUD, the only published study investigating immediate postplacental levonorgestrel IUD insertion utilized the manufacturer's inserter for IUD placement. The investigators therefore ask the question, is there a difference in expulsion rates between levonorgestrel and copper IUDs placed post-placentally when all providers undergo a standardized training, use a standardized insertion technique, and when patient level characteristics are controlled by randomization?
The investigators propose to perform a prospective cohort trial comparing the rates of expulsion for the levonorgestrel and the copper IUD by 3 months postpartum when placed in the uterus within 10 minutes of the delivery of the placenta, using a standardized technique (placement with a ring forceps or the operator's hand) after all providers undergo a formal didactic and skills training. The investigators hypothesis is that the levonorgestrel IUD has a higher rate of expulsion as compared to the copper IUD. Additional objectives include a comparison of the rates of complete IUD expulsion, partial IUD expulsion, unrecognized expulsions, complications, IUD continuation, pregnancy, and satisfaction. Additionally, the investigators will document the natural history of the location of the IUD within the uterus when placed in the immediate postpartum period, utilizing ultrasound at 24 hours, 6 weeks, and 3 months postpartum, to better understand the relationship between position of the IUD and subsequent expulsion.
Study Overview
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Colorado
-
Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
- University of Colorado Denver
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Women age ≥ 18
- Desire for immediate postpartum IUD or postpartum day #1 after a postplacental IUD placement
- English or Spanish speaking
- Willing to attend 2 follow-up visits
Exclusion Criteria:
- Multiple gestations
- Delivery prior to 35 weeks gestational age
- Allergy or sensitivity to any component of either IUD (including polyethylene, levonorgestrel or copper)
- Cesarean delivery
- Postpartum hemorrhage (estimated blood loss > 500 mL)
- Chorioamnionitis
- Abnormal uterine anatomy (including uterine anomaly or large fibroids)
- Treated for Chlamydia or Gonorrhea during pregnancy without a subsequent negative follow-up test
- Current cervical cancer or carcinoma in situ
- Current breast cancer
- Wilson's disease
- If enrolling postpartum after IUD has already been placed, women will be excluded if the provider used an insertion technique other than using the ring forceps or the operator's hand
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Cohort
- Time Perspectives: Prospective
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Mirena Group
Women who have a postplacental Mirena IUD placed.
(LNG-IUS)
|
The IUD will be placed as part of standard clinical care.
Other Names:
|
|
Paragard Group
Women who have a postplacental Paragard IUD placed.
(Copper IUD - T380A)
|
The IUD will be placed as part of standard clinical care.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
IUD Expulsion Rate
Time Frame: 3 months postpartum
|
The primary outcome of the study is the total number of expulsions in the full 3 month study period.
The provider will perform a speculum exam and transvaginal ultrasound.
If expulsion has occurred, the participant will have an abdominal x-ray to confirm.
|
3 months postpartum
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Pregnancy
Time Frame: 6 weeks
|
A urine pregnancy test will be performed at the 6 week follow up visit if clinically indicated.
|
6 weeks
|
|
Pregnancy
Time Frame: 3 months
|
A urine pregnancy test will be performed at the 3 month follow up visit if clinically indicated.
|
3 months
|
|
Complications
Time Frame: 3 months
|
A questionnaire will be administered to determine if the participant has had any complications since placement.
Number of women reporting complications are reported.
|
3 months
|
|
Satisfaction
Time Frame: 3 months
|
A questionnaire will be administered to determine the participant's satisfaction level with the IUD.
Satisfaction levels of >= 8 are reported by percent of participants.
|
3 months
|
|
Intrauterine Device Expulsion (Day 1)
Time Frame: Day 1
|
Number of expulsions at Day 1. Position of the IUD within the uterus will be documented by ultrasound.
|
Day 1
|
|
Intrauterine Device Expulsion (6 Weeks)
Time Frame: 6 weeks
|
Number of expulsions.
Position of the IUD within the uterus will be documented by ultrasound.
|
6 weeks
|
|
Intrauterine Device Expulsion by 12 Weeks Postpartum
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
Position of the IUD within the uterus will be documented by ultrasound.
|
12 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Stephanie Teal, MD, University of Colorado, Denver
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Chen BA, Reeves MF, Hayes JL, Hohmann HL, Perriera LK, Creinin MD. Postplacental or delayed insertion of the levonorgestrel intrauterine device after vaginal delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Nov;116(5):1079-87. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181f73fac.
- Mosher WD, Jones J. Use of contraception in the United States: 1982-2008. Vital Health Stat 23. 2010 Aug;(29):1-44.
- Braaten KP, Benson CB, Maurer R, Goldberg AB. Malpositioned intrauterine contraceptive devices: risk factors, outcomes, and future pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Nov;118(5):1014-1020. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182316308.
- ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 121: Long-acting reversible contraception: Implants and intrauterine devices. Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jul;118(1):184-196. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318227f05e. No abstract available.
- Celen S, Moroy P, Sucak A, Aktulay A, Danisman N. Clinical outcomes of early postplacental insertion of intrauterine contraceptive devices. Contraception. 2004 Apr;69(4):279-82. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2003.12.004.
- Eroglu K, Akkuzu G, Vural G, Dilbaz B, Akin A, Taskin L, Haberal A. Comparison of efficacy and complications of IUD insertion in immediate postplacental/early postpartum period with interval period: 1 year follow-up. Contraception. 2006 Nov;74(5):376-81. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2006.07.003. Epub 2006 Sep 15.
- Grimes DA, Lopez LM, Schulz KF, Van Vliet HA, Stanwood NL. Immediate post-partum insertion of intrauterine devices. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 May 12;(5):CD003036. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003036.pub2.
- Kapp N, Curtis KM. Intrauterine device insertion during the postpartum period: a systematic review. Contraception. 2009 Oct;80(4):327-36. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2009.03.024. Epub 2009 Aug 29.
- Speroff L, Mishell DR Jr. The postpartum visit: it's time for a change in order to optimally initiate contraception. Contraception. 2008 Aug;78(2):90-8. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2008.04.005. Epub 2008 Jun 12. No abstract available.
- Winner B, Peipert JF, Zhao Q, Buckel C, Madden T, Allsworth JE, Secura GM. Effectiveness of long-acting reversible contraception. N Engl J Med. 2012 May 24;366(21):1998-2007. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1110855.
- Thonneau PF, Almont T. Contraceptive efficacy of intrauterine devices. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Mar;198(3):248-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.10.787. Epub 2008 Jan 25. Erratum In: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Apr;198(4):485. Almont, Thierry E [corrected to Almont, Thierry].
- d'Arcangues C. Worldwide use of intrauterine devices for contraception. Contraception. 2007 Jun;75(6 Suppl):S2-7. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2006.12.024. Epub 2007 Apr 19.
- Finer LB, Zolna MR. Unintended pregnancy in the United States: incidence and disparities, 2006. Contraception. 2011 Nov;84(5):478-85. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.07.013. Epub 2011 Aug 24.
- Allen RH, Goldberg AB, Grimes DA. Expanding access to intrauterine contraception. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Nov;201(5):456.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.04.027. Epub 2009 Jun 13.
- Jackson RA, Schwarz EB, Freedman L, Darney P. Advance supply of emergency contraception. effect on use and usual contraception--a randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jul;102(1):8-16. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(03)00478-2.
- Conde-Agudelo A, Rosas-Bermudez A, Kafury-Goeta AC. Birth spacing and risk of adverse perinatal outcomes: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2006 Apr 19;295(15):1809-23. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.15.1809.
- Zhu BP, Rolfs RT, Nangle BE, Horan JM. Effect of the interval between pregnancies on perinatal outcomes. N Engl J Med. 1999 Feb 25;340(8):589-94. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199902253400801.
- Ogburn JA, Espey E, Stonehocker J. Barriers to intrauterine device insertion in postpartum women. Contraception. 2005 Dec;72(6):426-9. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2005.05.016. Epub 2005 Aug 9.
- Comparative multicentre trial of three IUDs inserted immediately following delivery of the placenta. Contraception. 1980 Jul;22(1):9-18. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(80)90112-2.
- Chi IC, Wilkens L, Rogers S. Expulsions in immediate postpartum insertions of Lippes Loop D and Copper T IUDs and their counterpart Delta devices--an epidemiological analysis. Contraception. 1985 Aug;32(2):119-34. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(85)90101-5.
- Morrison C, Waszak C, Katz K, Diabate F, Mate EM. Clinical outcomes of two early postpartum IUD insertion programs in Africa. Contraception. 1996 Jan;53(1):17-21. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(95)00254-5.
- Xu JX, Rivera R, Dunson TR, Zhuang LQ, Yang XL, Ma GT, Chi IC. A comparative study of two techniques used in immediate postplacental insertion (IPPI) of the Copper T-380A IUD in Shanghai, People's Republic of China. Contraception. 1996 Jul;54(1):33-8. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(96)00117-5.
- Hayes JL, Cwiak C, Goedken P, Zieman M. A pilot clinical trial of ultrasound-guided postplacental insertion of a levonorgestrel intrauterine device. Contraception. 2007 Oct;76(4):292-6. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2007.06.003. Epub 2007 Aug 6.
- Prescott GM, Matthews CM. Long-acting reversible contraception: a review in special populations. Pharmacotherapy. 2014 Jan;34(1):46-59. doi: 10.1002/phar.1358. Epub 2013 Oct 15.
- Inal MM, Ertopcu K, Ozelmas I. The evaluation of 318 intrauterine pregnancy cases with an intrauterine device. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2005 Dec;10(4):266-71. doi: 10.1080/13625180500195340.
- Sivin I, Stern J. Health during prolonged use of levonorgestrel 20 micrograms/d and the copper TCu 380Ag intrauterine contraceptive devices: a multicenter study. International Committee for Contraception Research (ICCR). Fertil Steril. 1994 Jan;61(1):70-7. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)56455-3.
- Sivin I, el Mahgoub S, McCarthy T, Mishell DR Jr, Shoupe D, Alvarez F, Brache V, Jimenez E, Diaz J, Faundes A, et al. Long-term contraception with the levonorgestrel 20 mcg/day (LNg 20) and the copper T 380Ag intrauterine devices: a five-year randomized study. Contraception. 1990 Oct;42(4):361-78. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(90)90046-x. Erratum In: Contraception 1991 Jan;43(1):100.
- Andersson K, Odlind V, Rybo G. Levonorgestrel-releasing and copper-releasing (Nova T) IUDs during five years of use: a randomized comparative trial. Contraception. 1994 Jan;49(1):56-72. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(94)90109-0.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Update to CDC's U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, 2010: revised recommendations for the use of contraceptive methods during the postpartum period. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011 Jul 8;60(26):878-83.
- De la Cruz D, Cruz A, Arteaga M, Castillo L, Tovalin H. Blood copper levels in Mexican users of the T380A IUD. Contraception. 2005 Aug;72(2):122-5. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2005.02.009.
- The TCu380A, TCu220C, multiload 250 and Nova T IUDS at 3,5 and 7 years of use--results from three randomized multicentre trials. World Health Organization. Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction: Task Force on the Safety and Efficacy of Fertility Regulating Methods. Contraception. 1990 Aug;42(2):141-58.
- Long-term reversible contraception. Twelve years of experience with the TCu380A and TCu220C. Contraception. 1997 Dec;56(6):341-52.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 13-3264
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Contraception
-
Virginia Commonwealth UniversityCompletedPregnancy Related | Contraception | Contraception Behavior | Contraception Use
-
Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development...CompletedFemale Contraception | Contraception
-
Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development...Completed
-
Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development...CompletedFemale Contraception | Contraception
-
Janssen Pharmaceutica N.V., BelgiumCompleted
-
Medical University of South CarolinaSociety of Family PlanningCompletedContraception | Contraception BehaviorUnited States
-
Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.CompletedFemale Contraception | ContraceptionUnited States, Israel
-
Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development...Completed
-
Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development...CompletedFemale Contraception | Contraception
-
Montefiore Medical CenterSociety of Family PlanningCompletedContraception | Breastfeeding | Postpartum ContraceptionUnited States
Clinical Trials on Mirena
-
University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterWithdrawnAdenomyosis | Abnormal Uterine Bleeding
-
First People's Hospital of HangzhouNot yet recruitingAdenomyosis | Hysteroscopy
-
University of California, San DiegoUniversity of Chicago; University of Illinois at Chicago; United States Naval... and other collaboratorsCompleted
-
University of LouisvilleTerminatedContraceptionUnited States
-
Minia UniversityNot yet recruitingEnhanced Myometrial Vascularity
-
Korean Gynecologic Oncology GroupUnknownEndometrial CancerKorea, Republic of
-
Korean Gynecologic Oncology GroupUnknownEndometrial HyperplasiaKorea, Republic of
-
University of PittsburghCompleted
-
Walsall Healthcare NHS TrustUnknownMenorrhagiaUnited Kingdom
-
Benha UniversityCompletedCesarean Section Complications | Abnormal Uterine Bleeding | Uterine ScarEgypt