Safety and Expulsion of Delayed Versus Immediate Postpartum Intrauterine Device Placement (IUD)

August 28, 2018 updated by: Mary Elaine Stauble, University of Louisville

Safety and Expulsion of Delayed Versus Immediate Postpartum Intrauterine Device Placement: A Randomized, Controlled Trial

This is randomized controlled trial designed for pregnant women who deliver vaginally at the University of Louisville Hospital and desire to have an intrauterine device (IUD) inserted for postpartum contraception. After informed consent is obtained, eligible study participants will be randomized to receive the Mirena® IUD at the 6 week postpartum visit or within 10 minutes of delivery of the placenta following a normal vaginal delivery. The investigators seek to determine the expulsion rate and complication rate in subjects with IUD immediately after placental delivery compared to insertion at six weeks postpartum or later. The investigators hypothesize that immediate placement safe and has an acceptably low expulsion rate to merit earlier placement in the indigent population.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Detailed Description

Unintended pregnancy occurs in nearly half of all pregnancies in the United States. There are many barriers to implementation of long-term reversible contraception in the immediate postpartum period. In our indigent population, a survey of patients showed that nearly 60% of patients who chose an IUD while admitted postpartum never returned for placement, placing them at risk for early repeat pregnancy.

The intrauterine device is a safe and effective form of long-term reversible contraception when placed at 6 weeks postpartum or later with pregnancy rates of only 0.1%. The commercially available Mirena IUD contains levonorgestrel which is released slowly over five years, providing safe, reversible contraception and making menstrual flow much lighter.

This randomized controlled trial will compare traditional placement at 6 weeks or more postpartum versus immediate post-placental placement.

The investigators hypothesize that the expulsion rate of IUDs placed immediately postpartum will be acceptably low in an indigent population to still be cost effective. Studies from the world literature in Egypt and Mexico where IUDs are routinely placed immediately following placental delivery.support this hypothesis. A recent study published in 2010 by Chen et al. showed an approximately 24% expulsion rate.

Six week postpartum IUD placement for contraception will be compared to immediate post-placental IUD placement, to determine whether immediate IUD insertion after delivery has an acceptably low rate of expulsion, infection, perforation and unintended pregnancy, and a high rate of retention, patient satisfaction, and maintenance of contraception.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

32

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Kentucky
      • Louisville, Kentucky, United States, 40202
        • University of Louisville

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

15 years to 45 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients must be 15- 45 years of age and received their prenatal care at the University of Louisville OB/GYN clinic
  2. Planned vaginal delivery
  3. Negative third trimester cultures for Gonorrhea and Chlamydia
  4. Desire to use the IUD for contraception

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Uterine anomalies
  2. Uterine or cervical neoplasia
  3. Past or current breast cancer
  4. Chorioamnionitis
  5. Acute liver disease
  6. Postpartum hemorrhage lasting greater than ten minutes or more than 500 mL blood loss
  7. Received prenatal other than at the University of Louisville OB/GYN Clinic
  8. Cesarean section

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: 1: IUD insertion 6 Weeks after delivery

Device:Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device marketed as Mirena.

Subjects randomized to interval placement will have their IUD placed in the office at six weeks postpartum or later. They must return for one visit within a month for a "string check".

The Mirena IUD is a levonorgestrel-releasing IUD which contains 52 mg levonorgestrel total and releases 20 mcg of hormone daily.
Other Names:
  • Mirena IUD
Experimental: 2: Immediate Post-placental insertion

Device: Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device marketed as Mirena

Subjects randomized to immediate post-placental placement within 10 minutes of delivery will have an IUD placed manually under sterile technique and with ultrasound guidance. An ultrasound will be performed within two days postpartum to verify proper placement and again at approximately six weeks postpartum.

The Mirena IUD is a levonorgestrel-releasing IUD which contains 52 mg levonorgestrel total and releases 20 mcg of hormone daily.
Other Names:
  • Mirena IUD

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
IUD Expulsion Rate
Time Frame: 6 months
The investigators wanted to compare the expulsion rate of IUDs between the two treatment arms: immediate placement after placental delivery and interval placement 6 weeks after delivery. IUD expulsion is confirmed by the inability of the physician to visualize the string attached to the IUD coming from the cervix.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mary E Stauble, MD, University of Louisville

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 21, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 13, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 14, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

May 15, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 25, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 28, 2018

Last Verified

August 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Contraception

Clinical Trials on Mirena (levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system)

3
Subscribe